Call to Adelaide University to stop endorsing nuclear energy as “zero emissions”
ADELAIDE UNIVERSITY IS WRONG IN 2013.
IT SHOULD CORRECT ITS ERRORS IN THE SAME MANNER OF INTEGRITY IT IS
SUPPOSED TO CORRECT ANY LEARNED PAPER.
Is Nuclear Power Zero Emissions and Carbon Neutral, Paul Langley’s
Nuclear History Blog, 3 Jan 2013,“………..MAY THE Vice C hancellor OF ADELAIDE UNIVERSITY MODIFY HIS ENDORSEMENT OF THE ZERO
EMISSION STATEMENT HIS INSTITUTION PUBLISHES. IT IS IN ERROR.
IN 2006 SHORTLY AFTER ADELAIDE UNIVERSITY FOUND THAT NUCLEAR VETERANS
SUFFERED A FAR HIGHER CANCER RISK THAN NON VETERANS, BLAMING THIS
INCREASE NOT ON THE BOMB TESTS BUT ON PETROL FUMES IN THE DESERT (IN
ITS DRAFT REPORT) AND BY COMPLETE IGNORANCE OF ANY POSSIBLE CAUSE,
DISMISSING THE BOMBS COMPLETELY, THE AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT PROPOSED
THE BUILDING OF A NUCLEAR POWER PLANT IN SOUTH AUSTRALIA’S NORTH.
CLOSE TO THE PEOPLE MOST AFFECTED BY THE BOMB FALLOUT
(IN THE OPINION
OF THE VICTIMS) OR PETROL FUMES (ADELAIDE UNIVERSITY DRAFT REPORT INTO
CANCER IN NUCLEAR VETERANS. ) GIVEN THAT DIESEL AND PETROL ARE, IN THE
OPINION OF ADELAIDE UNIVERSITY 2006 (DRAFDT REPORT) FAR MORE DANGEROUS
THAN BOMB FALLOUT AND REACTOR EMISSIONS, THERE IS THE OPTION OF
STORING THE WASTE ON THE GROUNDS OF THE ADELAIDE UNIVERSITY.
THE HEALTH BENEFITS OF THE RADIO CHEMICAL EMISSIONS FROM SUCH STORAGE
WOULD ATTRACT A STUDENT BASE OF A CERTAIN TYPE.
THE VATICAN WAS WRONG IN 1560 . ADELAIDE UNIVERSITY IS WRONG IN 2013.
IT SHOULD CORRECT ITS ERRORS IN THE SAME MANNER OF INTEGRITY IT IS
SUPPOSED TO CORRECT ANY LEARNED PAPER. IMO.
THEY ACTUALLY WOULD NOT WANT IT IN THEIR BACKYARD ANY MORE THAN THE
PEOPLE WHO DETERMINED HOUSE SOIL IN SYDNEY WAS TOO DANGEROUS TO REMAIN
IN PLACE. WHILE THE GENERAL PUBLIC MAY HAVE FORGOTTEN THE TRUE MEANING
OF NIMBY, – THAT THE SOIL IN ACTUAL BACKYARDS WAS TOO DANGEROUS TO
REMAIN IN PLACE –
THE FACT IS NUCLEAR IS NOT ZERO EMISSIONS AND THE
TOTAL FUEL CYCLE CONTRIBUTES TO GLOBAL CARBON DIOXIDE RELEASE. AND
NUKE INDUSTRY GETS HUGE DIESEL SUBSIDY FROM TAXPAYERS FOR THIS, WHICH
WILL IN THE LONG RUN CREATE CONSTANT RELEASES OF RADIO CHEMICAL
RELEASES – KRYPTON AND XENON AND THEIR DECAY PRODUCTS. WA RECEIVES
THESE EMISSIONS AS CREATED AND RELEASED BY REACTORS IN BRAZIL. IN
ADDITION TO THE CARBON RELEASED IN THE FUEL CYCLE PROCESS.
HOW MANY TONS OF CARBON HAS BEEN RELEASED BY THE RESPONSE TO
FUKUSHIMA? HAS THE INDUSTRY SAID?
THE CHERNOBYL VEHICLE GRAVE YARD – RADIOACTIVE VEHICLES AND AIRCRAFT
USED IN THE DISASTER AND FOREVER OFF LIMITS. THE CARBON FOOT PRINT? NOT
STATED…….: http://nuclearhistory.wordpress.com/2013/01/02/is-nuclear-power-zero-emissions-and-carbon-neutral/
1 Comment »
Leave a comment
1 This month
of the week – Disrupting War & Militarism in Oceania. Active solidarity. Radical practice.
Antinuclear 
The following is a copy of my most recent comment on the 6th December post on The Environment Institute FaceBook page
==========
Warning to The University of Adelaide.
“nuclear power, a zero-carbon generation source”
This is a false statement.
The making of this statement amounts to fraud with malfeasance.
Please qualify or retract this statement immediately.
=============================
So it has now been 29 days that this false statement has been published here.
So it has now been 29 days that I have been requesting immediate retraction or qualification of this false statement.
This is unacceptable behaviour by The University of Adelaide.
The persons responsible need to be identified and dismissed.
The false statement needs to be retracted and repudiated by The University of Adelaide.
This fraud must stop. Corrective action is needed now.
I now warn The University of Adelaide.
==========
The above is a copy of my most recent comment on the 6th December post on The Environment Institute FaceBook page
LikeLike