Antinuclear

Australian news, and some related international items

Don’t let Australia’s uranium lobby remove safeguards – say doctors

  It is essential that appropriate environmental and human safeguards remain, and that uranium mining and milling remains within the definition of “nuclear actions” for the purposes of the EPBC Act. There is a clear need for federal oversight to ensure clear and consistent implementation of these measures

Medical Assocation for the Prevention of War (MAPW)  SUBMISSION ON FEDERAL REGULATION OF URANIUM MINING, by Dr Margaret Beavis April 2013   The uranium mining industry is attempting to remove federal overview of uranium mining. MAPW Vice-President Dr Margaret Beavis has prepared this submission to the Productivity Commission arguing that federal oversight should remain, and noting that as risks to health and the environment become more apparent, radiation regulation is increasing internationally.:

exclamation-It is concerning that the uranium industry has used the expression “mild radiation” to describe its radiological environmental impacts, when there is no regulatory basis or definition to use this term, potentially giving the impression that the levels of radiation in the uranium mining industry are without risk to the environment. The evidence is clear and unassailable that this is not correct. Furthermore, it is appropriate that uranium mining continue to be considered a ‘nuclear action’ as specified by the EPBC Act as the radioactivity derives specifically from nuclear decay processes. Tailings from uranium mining are radioactive for millennia, resulting in unique environmental considerations for every uranium mine.

The International Commission on Radiological Protection has determined that the dose  coefficient for radon gas, one of the sources of radioactivity from uranium mining, needs to  be doubled, indicating that it is actually thought to be double the previously estimated carcinogenic hazard.1. ARPANSA is currently in the process of revising dose estimates to  workers. It follows that risks to others is doubled and makes it even more essential appropriate mitigation strategies are introduced. It also follows that the environmental risk is also increased. Continue reading

April 20, 2013 Posted by | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, safety, uranium | Leave a comment

Mainstream media ignores USA government’s weakening of radiation safety standards

Radiation-Warning1Shocking raise in nuclear radiation ‘safety levels’ announced Digital Journal By R. C. Camphausen Apr 17, 2013 –  Washington – Shocking is not only that the White House is significantly raising so-termed ‘safety levels’ for nuclear radiation in drinking water and soil, but also that mainstream media are all too quiet about this assault on people’s health.

 There are a few websites, for example here and here, who’ve picked up and reproduced the information, it will be interesting to watch how long it takes major media outlets to report and comment on this development.
 Rather than doing something to reduce the dangers invisibly emanating from nuclear plants and enriched weaponry, the White House and the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) have apparently chosen to accommodate the nuclear industry rather than protect the population.
 In the original article, published on the website of Helen Caldicott and also at Global Research, we read that the new ‘safety levels’ couldincrease a longstanding 1 in 10,000 person cancer rate to a rate of 1 in 23 persons exposed over a 30-year period.
 Raising these radiation guides known as PAGs (Protective Action Guides), can only mean one or two things. Either, radiation levels in drinking water and soil are terribly high right now, due to Chernobyl and Fukushima for example, or they are expected be alarmingly high in the near future.…. http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/348161

April 20, 2013 Posted by | Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Remembering Australia’s wars – what about the one against the Aborigines?

censorship-blackon the 97.8 per cent of human affairs conducted in this place before colonisation, on the 2000 generations who made their lives where Hyde Park now stands, on what happened in our obtaining of it, and on what became of the ‘dispossessed’, not a word or stone is spent.

It’s time we started talking about how Anzac Day can embrace difficult realities of war and nation, and still do the other things it needs to

The Australian wars that Anzac Day neglects, EUREKA STREET, DEAN ASHENDEN APRIL 21, 2013   For more than 30 years the Australian War Memorial in the nation’s capital has refused to consider any recognition of the long and often violent conflict between black and white.

The proposal that the memorial might commemorate the ‘frontier wars’ first came in 1979 from Geoffrey Blainey. It has since been repeated by commentators and scholars including the then-principal historian at the memorial, Dr Peter Stanley, and a former army chief of staff, Lieut-General John Coates. To no avail.

The memorial is not alone in its silence. Sydney’s Hyde Park, just a few hundred metres from where it all began, has almost as many monuments, memorial gardens and commemorative fountains as trees, most to do with our loss, sacrifice and valour in war, the struggles of our explorers and pioneers, or the sagacity of our civic leaders. Continue reading

April 20, 2013 Posted by | aboriginal issues, AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL | Leave a comment

Plutonium in the continuing leakage of high level radiation in water from Fukushima nuclear reactors

eyes-surprisedThe most recent report on the leakage problem said that about 22 liters of radioactive water had leaked from gaps between the pipes used to transfer it from underground water storage tank into an another tank, and that the level of radioactivity in the water was 290,000Bq/m3.  
 This is so high that the leakage is unsafe to approach.  Prof. Koide commented that according to Japanese law, the safety level of radioactive water that can be discharged into the environment is 0.05Bq/m3, or 0./03Bq/m3 if it contains strontium, so it is easy to imagine how high 290,000Bq/m3 actually is!
 
Dousing it or injecting it with water is the only way of continuing to cool the molten fuel, and this requires 400tons of water every day.  Prof. Koide also observed that the leaks will carry on for as long as Tepco keeps using water to cool the molten fuel, possibly for at least 40 more years, or as long as it takes to decommission the plant.
PuThe underground tanks were meant to store low level of radioactive water after being filtered through ALPS.  But they have been using them to store high level of radioactive water (including the β (beta)emitting nuclide, Strontium and the α (alpha)emitting nuclide, Plutonium).  

Fukushima report: Plutonium should be in the leakage! 汚染水問題に関する小出先生のコメント、報道するラジオより。 追加報告:プルトニウムも汚染水に混じっているはず!  by Mia (JANUK)    18 April 2013

…..The last one was plutonium 241, which had radiation dose about 50 times as much as the total of the other three(PU238, PU239 & PU240)…..

….The underground tanks were meant to store low level of radioactive water after being filtered through ALPS.  But they have been using them to store high level of radioactive water (including β (beta) emitting nuclide, Strontium and α (alphaemitting nuclide, Plutonium)….. Continue reading

April 20, 2013 Posted by | Uncategorized | Leave a comment

70% of Portugal’s electricity comes from renewable energy

Portugal Provides 70% of Electricity Using Renewable Energy , Design Build, 19 April 13, By Marc Howe Figures from Portugal’s electricity network operator indicate that 70 per cent of all electricity consumed in the country during the first quarter of this year was derived from renewable energy sources, leading to a marked decline in the usage of conventional fossil fuels for power generation purposes. Continue reading

April 20, 2013 Posted by | Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Hear Radioactive Show podcast about the Radioactive Exposure Tour 2013

podcastSmhttp://www.3cr.org.au/radioactive/podcast/radioactive-show-13042013  Radioactive Show 13.04.2013

What Happens on Rad Tour… Doesn’t stay on Rad Tour. The Radioactive Exposure Tour 2013, organised by Friends of the Earth, ventured into the nuclear heartlands of South Australia and back. This weeks show is an audio reportback of the trip, and the inspirations and challenges of learning about the nuclear industry. Bhargavi Dilipkumar, an Indian anti-nuclear activist gives a talk on the shore of Lake Eyre, and a salty poem is shared.

File Download (30:00 min / 14 MB)

April 20, 2013 Posted by | Audiovisual | Leave a comment

Doctors make powerful statement on protection of animals from uranium mining radiation

text-radiation Medical Assocation for the Prevention of War (MAPW)  SUBMISSION ON FEDERAL REGULATION OF URANIUM MINING, by Dr Margaret Beavis April 2013 “…..With regard to non-human species, the 2010 ARPANSA Technical Report No. 154 entitled
“Environmental protection: Development of an Australian approach for assessing effects of  ionising radiation on non-human species” made the following statements:
“It is now generally accepted that under certain circumstances, there is a need to demonstrate, rather than assume, that non-human species living in natural habitats are  protected against ionising radiation risks from radionuclides released to the environment by
human actions.
In an Australian context, there is a recognised need for specific national guidance on protection of non-human species, for which the uranium mining industry provides the major  backdrop; it is Australian Government policy that uranium mining should be based on world
best practice standards for assessing environmental impacts.
It is timely that Australia now consider the development of guidance in order to provide clear  and nationally consistent advice to operators and regulators on protection of non-human  species, including advice on specific assessment methods and models and how these might
be applied in an Australian context.
This report reviews the ICRP and ERICA internaational frameworks for assessment and  protection of non-human species and the applicability to the Australian context.
The general conclusions to be drawn from this report include:
• At the international level, the International Commission on Radiological Protection  has established a framework for radiological assessment and protection of nonhuman species based on a reference animal and plant approach;
• In an Australian context, there is a need for specific national guidance on protection  of non-human species, identified through the National Directory for Radiation  Protection, and realised by the need of the uranium mining industry to integrate world  best practice standards for assessing environmental impacts;Without federal oversight and reporting this is highly unlikely to happen in any consistent,
coherent or comparable manner. So inclusion in the EPBC Act is essential……http://www.mapw.org.au/files/downloads/2013-04-Productivity-Commission-uranium-submission.pdf

April 20, 2013 Posted by | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, environment, uranium | Leave a comment

Height of waves is increasing due to climate change

see-this.wayVIDEO Climate change increasing wave height ABC News http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-04-18/climate-nuke-&-seaLchange-predicted-to-increase-wave-height/4637624  By Fiona Blackwood Apr 19, 2013 Scientists are beginning to predict how climate change will influence the height of waves.

The impact on wave height has been a neglected area of research until now.

CSIRO research scientist Mark Hemer says buoys and satellites around the world have been modelling how changes in atmospheric circulation will influence sea swells. “We see an increase in wave heights in the Southern Ocean and we see decreases in a lot of the rest of the global oceans,” he said.

Waves in the Southern Ocean could increase by half a metre over the next century.

Dr John Hunter, from the Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems CRC, says wave height will have a similar impact on coastal areas as sea level rise.”So changing waves and sea level can cause recession probably of order in some places say 100 metres this century,” he said.

“That’s quite likely a lot of houses are within 100 metres of the shoreline.” For the first time wave height will be included in a new report by the International Panel on Climate Change.

April 20, 2013 Posted by | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, climate change - global warming | Leave a comment