Antinuclear

Australian news, and some related international items

Abbott’s attack on renewable energy is bad economic judgment

The most baffling thing about Abbott’s assault on renewable energy is that it also flies in the face of economic good sense.

Abbott-destroys-renewablesAustralian PM Ignores Climate Change, Trades Renewables for Coal , Triple Pundit, ““““Eric Justian | Thursday January 16th, 2014……..The Australian government, under Prime Minister Tony Abbott, seems committed to exacerbating its nation’s climate woes. Even as his Environmental Minister approved a vast coal mine that will produce 40 million tons of CO2-emitting coal per year, Abbott is calling Australia’s strong renewable energy sector into question.

He’s cutting funding for renewables, threatening to remove the 20 percent renewable energy standard and even falling back on the old and largely debunked criticism that wind power has negative impacts on human health.  Australia’s National Health and Medical Research Council looked into the issue in 2010 and again in 2012. And now Abbott is calling for another review. Because, why not?

And just for good measure, he’s also dismantling Australia’s well-regarded plans for curbing carbon emissions and jettisoning the nation’s goals for carbon reductions………

Bats are literally falling from the Australian skies by the tens of thousands, dying in the record heatwaves. Deadly brush fires are rampaging through suburban neighborhoods, destroying scores of homes and taking at least one life. And though the summer is still young, it’s already reaching 40 degrees Celsius in some places. That’s 104 degrees Fahrenheit. The average temperature just about anywhere in Australia but for the coasts is expected to get as high as 45 degrees Celsius, or 113 degrees Fahrenheit. That’s average temperature. Hotter in some places, colder in others. Average! That’s hot. Prime Minister Abbott’s response to all of this –  “fire is part of the Australian experience … it has been since humans were on this cot’s a waving away of a very real trend toward more severe weather events: droughts, hurricanes, derecho winds, polar vortexes and heat waves. Yeah, we’ve always had them. But they’re getting worse.
The most baffling thing about Abbott’s assault on renewable energy is that it also flies in the face of economic good sense. Australia has some of the cheapest wind power in the world and is an ideal place for wind power.  In Australia, wind power even rivals the cost of coal. The Bureau of Resource and Energy Economics agrees that wind power is competitive with fossil fuels.ntinent.” So why is Prime Minister Abbot saying things like “lower power prices are the government’s primary goal” while throwing roadblocks in the way of one of the cheapest – and getting cheaper – sources of electricity?

Australia can power itself entirely through renewable sources like wind and solar power by 2040. They could do it affordably, reliably and cleanly — working towards reducing the climatic impact on the nation. There’s simply no benefit to moving back toward coal, and nothing but risk.At least the U.S. doesn’t hold a monopoly on climate change denialists in public office. http://www.triplepundit.com/2014/01/australian-pm-ignores-climate-change-trades-renewables-coal/

January 17, 2014 Posted by | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, climate change - global warming, energy | Leave a comment

Climate change being ignored by Australia’s leaders. to our cost

cartoon-climate-Aust

Giving financial assistance to the coal industry is irresponsible, to say the least. This is an industry that has profited, unhindered, for at least a century. This is an industry that should be phased out by Australia. This is an industry that will fall into the abyss, at the hands of its own customers, as the rest of the world takes on climate change.

What ever happened to climate change in Australia? http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=15927&page=2 David Leigh 17 Jan 14 In the lead up to the last election, climate change was part of usual rhetoric that politicians espouse, along with the many other championed causes. It was either about the Clean Energy Fund, fueled by the Carbon Tax and by the Labor camp, or it was about not believing the science from the Liberals. Actually, that is far from liberal open-mindedness, when you think about it.

Either way, the airwaves were full of discussion about the biggest threat to humanity of all time. Now, as we find ourselves 6-months into Abbott’s Australia, there is little or no discussion. First he attempted to silence the reporting body by removing its funding, as though stopping talk would make it all go away. Now, even the Labor opposition remains quite on the subject. Only the Greens appear to understand that it won’t abate, although the Green focus seems to be snagged temporarily on asylum seeker wellbeing. Incidentally, that is another subject that seems to have gone away since the reporting stopped.

Despite having just had the hottest year on record and every monthly Australian record being broken and with the US having an unprecedented cold snap with temperatures below –34c the subject has conveniently gone quiet. This of course suits the big end of town, because climate change is expensive to mitigate. They should also realize it is far more expensive to ignore.

graph-Climate-Action_vs_Ina

Australia is still locked in the same old political cycle of red team, blue team and the policies of the current blue team – if you can call them policies – seem focused only on the next 3-years. It is a far cry from the time of independents like Tony Windsor and Rob Oakeshott, where governance was about policy not dogma Continue reading

January 17, 2014 Posted by | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, climate change - global warming | Leave a comment

Why nuclear power cannot solve climate change

nuke-hotUnlike solar power, nuclear power does not work well in warming climates. The summer of 2004’s heat wave across Europe not only killed thousands of people, but because of dwindling river levels caused many reactors to reduce power levels and even shut down entirely.
Reactors require vast quantities of water to keep the core cool; changes in waternuke-tap levels, and even water temperatures, can greatly affect reactor operations. Reactors in the U.S. have similarly been forced to close during heat waves.
NUCLEAR POWER AND CLIMATE: WHY  NUKES CAN’T SAVE THE PLANET TOO MANY REACTORS; NOT ENOUGH CARBON sign antinukeREDUCTIONS http://www.climatecollective.org/media/uploads/resources/nukesclima.pdf
Major studies (from MIT, Commission on Energy Policy, and International Atomic Energy Agency, for example) agree that about 1,500-2,000 large new atomic reactors would have to be built for nuclear power to make any meaningful dent in
greenhouse emissions.
Operation of that many new reactors (currently about 440 exist worldwide) would cause known uranium reserves to run out in just a few decades and force mining of lower-grade uranium, which itself would lead to higher greenhouse emissions. If all of these reactors were used to replace coal plants, carbon emissions would drop by about 20% worldwide. If used entirely as new capacity, in the place of sustainable technologies like wind power, solar power, energy efficiency, etc., carbon emissions actually would increase.
TOO MUCH MONEY
Construction of 1,500 new reactors would cost trillions of dollars (U.S. reactors going online in the 1980s and 90s averaged about $4 billion apiece). Use of resources of this magnitude would make it impossible to also implement genuinely effective means of addressing global warming.
Energy efficiency improvements, for example, are seven times more effective at reducing greenhouse gases, per dollar spent, than nuclear power. Yearly costs per 1000 kg avoided CO2 emissions are $68.9 for wind and $132.5 for nuclear power
TOO MUCH TIME Construction of 1,500 new reactors means opening a new reactor about once every two weeks, beginning today, for the next 60 years—an impossible schedule. The world’s nuclear reactor manufacturers currently are capable of building about half that amount. Since reactors take 6-10 years to build (some U.S. reactors that began operation in the 1990s took more than 20 years), we are already that long behind schedule and will fall farther behind. Addressing the climate crisis cannot wait for nuclear power. Continue reading

January 17, 2014 Posted by | Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Countering the Thorium Nuclear Reactor Propaganda

astroturf-botAs expert Jo Abbess states more clearly than anyone, thorium is “quite probably the most well-funded piece of astroturfing propaganda in existence.” 

Thorium Nuclear Information Resources  http://kevinmeyerson.wordpress.com/2012/04/26/thorium-nuclear-information-resources/ There is a rash of misinformation on the net about the supposed merits of the ‘new’ nuclear energy source on the block, thorium. I am sure that in a perfect world where nobody lies, thorium would be the perfect answer to the world’s energy needs as is claimed. This is unfortunately not the case.

Apparently, every time there is a new nuclear catastrophe, the thorium ‘miracle’ is promoted again as the ‘savior’ for the world. The Fukushima nuclear radiation catastrophe was not unique and the thorium misinformation artists have come out in droves. It’s the nuclear industry’s defense mechanism – create a new ‘safety myth’ that regular people can latch onto.

Thorium-pie-in-sky

In reality, the thorium nuclear fuel cycle has been under development since the very early days of the nuclear industry. India, for example, has spent decades trying to commercialize it, and has failed. The US, Russia, Germany, and many others tried and failed as well. At best, thorium based nuclear power generation may be commercialized in a few decades.

I doubt it.

Fortunately, there are a number of independent trustworthy and expert sources of information on the internet regarding thorium nuclear. Here they are:………. Continue reading

January 17, 2014 Posted by | Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Solar power combats effects of heat wave in Australia

Aust-sunAustralian Heatwave Solar Power Statistics http://www.energymatters.com.au/index.php?main_page=news_article&article_id=4129 17 Jan 14, The contribution solar energy has made in combating the effects of the current heatwave is significant.

With electricity generation plants and mains supply networks feeling the strain of  40C-plus heat and demand caused by air-conditioning; solar has helped alleviate the pressure.

The Australian Solar Council has found that at their peak on Wednesday,solar panel systems were contributing the following as a percentage of state electricity use:

– 27.54% in South Australia
– 11.77% in Western Australia
– 8.14% in Queensland
– 5.38% in Victoria
– 5.23% in New South Wales

The value of this power was not only in the quantity, but also in its timing; with peak production between 2:30pm-5:00pm – a timeframe when demand is high. This helped to rein in wholesale pricing which has reached staggering levels at times and possibly reduced the number of blackouts and load shedding that may have otherwise occurred.

Load shedding and blackouts are not only inconvenient and can cause significant economic losses; the often sudden nature of these events can also be dangerous.

“As a community we should be congratulating those people who have made a significant personal investment in installing solar PV, which is now paying dividends for the entire community,” said John Grimes, Chief Executive of the Australian Solar Council.

“Because solar PV produces electricity where it is used and does not need vast network infrastructure, the power that is produced is all being used to best effect, which adds up to a big saving for solar.”

“In a country like Australia where 1 in 100 year heat waves are becoming more frequent, solar is the perfect solution” said Mr. Grimes. “We expect more and more Australians to invest in solar PV systems to take control of their own energy future.”

While some states are yet to feel any relief from the heat, it’s reassuring to know that thousands of solar power systems are quietly working away delivering clean energy and helping to keep the lights and cool on indoors for many.

January 17, 2014 Posted by | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, solar | Leave a comment

Australian Renewable Energy Agency, (ARENA) funding offshore wind energy

wind-turbine-oceanOcean Power Technologies forms new offshore wind power funding agreement With Australian Government http://www.renewableenergyfocus.com/view/36498/ocean-power-technologies-forms-new-offshore-wind-power-funding-agreement-with-australian-government/ 16 January 2014

A$66.5 million grant will be used towards the cost of building and deploying a 62.5MW peak-rated wave power station off the coast of Portland, Victoria. The agreement with the Australian Renewable Energy Agency, or “ARENA”, is a Deed of Variation to the original Funding Deed, through which a A$66.5 million grant was previously awarded by the Commonwealth.

Among the important changes included in the new agreement are:

The incorporation of milestones for each of the three stages of the project
Acceleration of reimbursement of eligible expenses for stages one and two
An increase in the number of milestones to better support project cash flow requirements The agreement also recognizes the role of Lockheed Martin as the lead for systems integration of the PowerBuoys and overall program management.

According to Charles F. Dunleavy, CEO of Ocean Power Technologies, the new agreement significantly improves the ability to attract investors during the early stages of the project. It also raises the prospect of manufacturing, engineering and maritime jobs in Victoria, he added.
The planned Portland wave power station has a total project value of AU $232 million and, at completion, would be the largest of its kind in the world, according to Dunleavy. With twenty-eight PowerBuoys connected to the grid by an underwater substation and a submarine cable, the plant would be capable of providing power for up to 10,000 homes.
The project is being developed by Victorian Wave Partners (VWP), a wholly owned subsidiary of Ocean Power Technologies Australasia Pty Ltd (“OPTA”), an Australian company owned by Ocean Power Technologies (88%) and Woodside Energy Ltd (12%), Australia’s largest independent oil and gas company. VWP was awarded the grant by the Commonwealth ofAustralia through a competitive process undertaken as part of the Renewable Energy Demonstration Program, which is administered by ARENA.

January 17, 2014 Posted by | Victoria, wind | Leave a comment