Diseconomics of Small Modular Nuclear Reactors (SMRs)
Economics of SMRs nuClear News, August 14 “……….Union of Concerned Scientist says just because these reactors are cheaper doesn’t mean to say they are cost effective.Economies of scale dictate that, all other things being equal, larger reactors will generate cheaper power. SMR proponents suggest that mass production of modular reactors could offset economies of scale, but a 2011 study concluded that SMRs would still be more expensive per kWh than current reactors. (5) Even if SMRs could eventually be more cost-effective than larger reactors due to mass production, this advantage will only come into play when many SMRs are in operation.
But utilities are unlikely to invest in SMRs until they can produce competitively. priced electric power. This Catch-22 suggests the technology will require significant government financial help to get off the ground. Dr. Mark Cooper, senior fellow for economic analysis at the Vermont Law School’s Institute for Energy and the Environment agrees with UCS that SMRs are likely to have higher costs per unit of output than conventional reactors. (6)
SMRs are unlikely to breathe new life into the increasingly moribund U.S. nuclear power industry, according to the Washington-based Institute for Energy and Environmental Research (IEER). They will probably require tens of billions of dollars in federal subsidies or government purchase orders, they will create new reliability vulnerabilities, as well as serious concerns in relation to both safety and proliferation. (7) (8………… http://www.no2nuclearpower.org.uk/nuclearnews/NuClearNewsNo65.pdf
No comments yet.

Leave a comment