Antinuclear

Australian news, and some related international items

Citizens’ Jury Just how much negative opinion on nuclear will be allowed?

Jury (1)Annette Ellen Skipworth  No High Level International Nuclear Waste Dump in South Australia The bit i listen to ..everyone had a wonderful day yesterday ..
I wonder if they will give the anti nuke view as well ..
You know ..the millions of contaminanted areas of the world due to ooops moments
The leaking nuclear reactors ..
The fact.. no other country wants this waste dump
The money it will cost
The lose of income for our food industry that pride themselves on a safe,green and clean image…
And who will be responsible when best practise and safety go out the window due to cost.savings..
This is just a gateway for small nuclear reactors and nuclear submarines. .
Just a few of the answers i would like to hear
Cause i have been on the know nuclear site and its all lovely safe and wonderful according to the experts
Honesty and transparency   
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1314655315214929/

October 9, 2016 Posted by | General News | Leave a comment

Citizens’ Jury members not allowed to change the wording of their set question.

Jury (1)9 Oct 16 Tim Bickmore Some of the Jury Members requested that the form of the question be changed to adjust the term ‘circumstances’ into better context ie the question should be along the lines of …. whether or not to pursue the HLW dump, & if so, under what circumstances…..
They were informed that there would be no change to the question. This calls into question any claims that the Jury is in Charge of the process.

The set question is “Under what circumstances, if any, could South Australia pursue the opportunity to store and dispose of nuclear waste from other countries?”

 

October 9, 2016 Posted by | NUCLEAR ROYAL COMMISSION 2016, politics, secrets and lies, South Australia | Leave a comment