As Antarctica thaws, China, Russia and others move in
|
China and Russia are eyeing up Antarctica — and experts say Australia should be more concerned, ABC, 28 Oct 18 By Holly Robertson Australia is spending $2 billion on a new Antarctic icebreaker — the biggest single investment in the history of our Antarctic program.
Key points:
The state of the art RSV Nuyina — which was floated last month — will primarily support Australia’s scientific research team in Antarctica, but it also has another purpose: shoring up our territorial claim to 42 per cent of the icy continent, where countries including China and Russia have been ramping up their presence…….. What is Australia’s role in Antarctica? The Australian Antarctic Territory covers a whopping 5.9 million square kilometres, making it nearly 80 per cent of the size of Australia and the largest Antarctic claim of any country, according to the Australian Antarctic Division. Australia has three year-round research stations on Antarctica, as well as one on Macquarie Island, and conducts dozens of scientific research programs. But in recent years Antarctic experts have been critical of the Australian Government’s commitment to our efforts on the icy continent, both in terms of funding and attention. “Australia’s standing in Antarctic affairs is eroding because of historical underinvestment at a time when new players are emerging in Antarctica,” expert Tony Press warned in a 2014 Government-commissioned report.
Who are the new players and what are they doing there? Six other countries lay claim to parts of Antarctica — Argentina, Australia, Chile, France, New Zealand, Norway, and the United Kingdom — while many more also have research stations there and take part in joint scientific projects. In the past decade, China and Russia in particular have both ramped up their presence in Antarctica. China in particular has become a “leading polar player” in just 10 years and now spends more in Antarctica than any other country, according to a report by Anne Marie Brady, an expert on China and the Antarctic at the University of Canterbury in New Zealand………. there remains a divide between the countries that want to keep it pristine, such as Australia and New Zealand, and the ones that hope to eventually exploit its potential, like China and Russia, as global resources decline and a ban on mining comes up for renegotiation in 2048. But even more crucial, according to Dr Brady, is that Antarctica has emerged as a site of global strategic importance……… What does this mean for Antarctica’s future — and ours? The Antarctic Treaty of 1959 does not necessarily guarantee Australia’s claim to territory on the icy continent, as many people seem to think. In fact, La Trobe University’s Daniel Bray says that the treaty “essentially set aside all claims to Antarctica in order to create a legal [framework] to manage human activity on the continent”.
|
|
Scott Morrison’s desperate electricity measures have no real policy future
Sensible electricity rules await the next government, Brisbane Times By Ross Gittins, 28 October 2018 You can call it populism or you can call it desperation. In the case of Scott Morrison’s recent problem-solving efforts, desperation fits better. And wouldn’t you be?
Morrison is probably right in concluding it’s too late in the piece to be worried about carefully considered, long-lasting solutions to the many problems contributing to his government’s unpopularity………
Morrison has an election to avoid losing. If Tony Abbott hadn’t greatly compounded the problem by abolishing the carbon tax, you could feel a bit sorry for Morrison. The monumental stuff-up of the move to a national electricity market, with its price blowouts at every level – generation, transmission and distribution, and retail – was decades in the making.
Only with the doubling of retail prices over the past decade has realisation dawned that the federalgovernment can’t escape ultimate political responsibility for a “national” market run by a squabbling committee of state and territory energy ministers.
But Morrison’s announcement last week of a desperate collection of good, bad and indifferent measures to get retail prices down in a hurry – or at least appear to be getting them down – seems no better than a crude attempt to bludgeon some quick retail price cuts out of the three oligopolists that have come to dominate the market.
As was powerfully demonstrated by the events leading to the overthrow of Malcolm Turnbull, no government whose members can’t agree that the threat of climate change is real is capable of achieving a policy regime that restores a stable future for the energy industry. …….https://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/business/the-economy/sensible-electricity-rules-await-the-next-government-20181028-p50cfq.html
Is it time for BHP to sell Olympic Dam uranium mine?
BHP approaches sliding doors moment at Olympic Dam
Peter Ker
How did this very complex, unreliable and expensive mine survive the chop that claimed so many other BHP assets in recent years? … (subscribers only)
Nuclear ban treaty could come into force in 2019, campaigners say — peoples trust toronto
https://ift.tt/2CNwOaH October 28, 2018 By Tom Miles GENEVA (Reuters) – A treaty banning nuclear weapons could come into force by the end of 2019, backers of a campaign that won the 2017 Nobel Peace Prize said in an annual progress report on Monday. The treaty aims to stigmatize nuclear weapons as previous treaties marginalized landmines […]
via Nuclear ban treaty could come into force in 2019, campaigners say — peoples trust toronto
North Korea’s Other Nuclear Threat — Nuclear Exhaust
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/north-korea/2017-08-28/north-koreas-other-nuclear-threat Foreign Affairs magazine SNAPSHOT August 28, 2017 North KoreaSouth Korea North Korea’s Other Nuclear Threat Why We Have More to Fear Than Just Bombs By Bennett Ramberg “As the world grapples with the nuclear threat emanating from North Korea, it is not only bombs that should concern us. It is also the dozens of […]
Nuclear facilities as potential targets in China and UK — Nuclear Exhaust
Nuclear reactors as potential targets in UK Wales Trawsfynydd (not operating) Latitude: 52° 55′ 30.06″ N (52.92502°) Longitude: 3° 56′ 57.23″ W (-3.94923° Wylfa (not operating) Latitude: 53° 24′ 59.95″ N (53.41666°) Longitude: 4° 28′ 59.24″ W (-4.48312°) Scotland Chapelcross nuclear power station (not operating) Latitude: 55° 0′ 56.29″ N (55.01562°) Longitude: 3° 13′ 33.78″ […]
via Nuclear facilities as potential targets in China and UK — Nuclear Exhaust
Terrific Ground Water Pollution in SC Made Worse by 2018 Hurricanes – Entire Southeast Probably the Same — flying cuttlefish picayune
how could South Carolina, or the affected southeast states handle massive new contamination from flooded refineries, chemical plants, nuke “processing facilities”, hog farms (some of the biggest factory farms in the country) untreated sewage, poultry farms and pesticide stockpiles?




