UK’s planning inspectorate should shut down the plan for Sizewell nuclear power, vulnerable to climate change
|
Spoiler alert: it’ll be a miracle if the project falls at that hurdle, radioactive though it is. It just starts the planning They include Nick Scarr, from the Nuclear Consulting Group, a collection of academics and experts. The consulting engineer believes Sizewell C is in a “dangerous location”, a position set out in a peer-reviewed paper. But, when his views were reported here almost a fortnight ago, EDF dismissed them. It claimed his analysis of th protective effects of the offshore Sizewell-Dunwich bank and a coralline crag was both confused and wrong. EDF made its point in a background briefing, since when it has repeatedly refused to provide any on-the-record statement to back its opinion. So, having given the company plenty of time, here’s one conclusion to draw. That Mr Scarr is bang-on. As he points How untrustworthy does it want to look? Big nuclear’s already toxic enough: exploding costs, endless delays, pricey https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/shabby-treatment-of-go-outdoors-staff-nwst5btnl |
|
No comments yet.


Leave a comment