This week’s counteracting the nuclear spin

Some bits of good news: European cities embrace nature-based solutions, What went right this week: in the UK green energy records hit . China’s Falling Emissions Signal Peak Carbon May Already Be Here – Carbon Brief notes first decline since the end of the pandemic.- Renewables meet nearly all of nation’s additional power needs
TOP STORIES. Small Modular Reactors: Still too expensive, too slow and too risky. US Endgame in Ukraine — War Without End, Amen.Biden Lets Ukraine Strike Russia With US Weapons While Ukraine Attacks Russian Nuclear Defenses.Presidents Who Gamble With Nuclear Armageddon.
Climate. Humanity’s survival is still within our grasp – just. But only if we take these radical steps. ‘Unliveable’: Delhi’s residents struggle to cope in record-breaking heat. Heatwaves increase risk of early births and poorer health in babies, study finds. “Truly the stuff of nightmares”: unprecedented low in Antarctic sea ice recorded.
Noel’s notes. “Don’t let the people see what is happening” – the forgotten lesson from the Vietnam war. Turning Point .The bomb and the cold war. Episode 4: The Wall – outlines the nuclear weapons race. Jobs jobs jobs in the nuclear industry – but is it true? What is criminal in Ukraine, is God’s righteousness in Gaza
Nuclear. The USA’s intrepid nuclear saleswoman, Jennifer Graholm, touts big nuclear reactors as a great success, speaking of the greatest U.S. financial nuclear boondoggle – the Vogtle nuclear reactors. Does anybody believe this?
*************************************************
AUSTRALIA.
- Summary of Australian federal and state/territory nuclear/uranium laws and prohibitions.
- Nuclear Shaping Up To Be The Big Issue Next Election– https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMT_IVoKtIg Every day between now and the election’: Albanese ignites nuclear fight with Dutton.
- Nuclear will cost Queensland jobs.
- CSIRO stands by nuclear power costings that contradict Coalition claims.
- Inside the nuclear influence machine.
- Ex Prime Minister Scott Morrison on the revolving door- government nuclear AUKUS deal, to Dyne, company advising on AUKUS.
- Nuclear plan a ‘distraction‘ as coal town transitions. “We haven’t been consulted:” Coal town on transition to renewables is not interested in nuclear.
- Australia, Defence and the anti-Midas touch with submarines.
NUCLEAR ISSUES.
| ATROCITIES. Gaza: After ICJ order to halt attacks on Rafah, Israel launches over 60 air raids on the city in 48 hours., | CULTURE. The US Empire Isn’t A Government That Runs Nonstop Wars, It’s A Nonstop War That Runs A Government. | EDUCATION. Ukrainian Grad Students Complete Nuclear Internship Program in the United States. | EMPLOYMENT. Dounreay nuclear site workers strike in pay dispute. |
| ENERGY. The (currently terrible) mood in renewables… is largely irrelevant. ‘Offshore wind farms could have averted Fukushima disaster’. A global review of Battery Storage: the fastest growing clean energy technology today. | EVENTS.10 June WEBINAR: Using JFK’s wisdom to make peace today – with Jeffrey Sachs16 June .WEBINAR. Gaza and Ukraine to WWIII: The NATO Problem. 16 June – WEBINAR -“NATO IN THE ARCTIC” |
| LEGAL. To continue the Gaza genocide, Israel and the US must destroy the laws of war. Tribunal judge accused of covering up complaints – about bullying at Sellafield nuclear plant and other sites. | MEDIA. SOS – An Antidote to Crackpot Neo-Nuclearism. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FDF1bLN9K8c Searchlight Journalist Receives 2024 MOLLY Award for Story on Trucheña Whose Plutonium Count Was New Mexico’s Highest. | PLUTONIUM. Plutonium found in Indiana Street air filters near Rocky Flats; Boulder Commissioners reconsider trail project. |
| POLITICS. White House to support new nuclear power plants in the U.S. US Energy Secretary calls for more nuclear power while celebrating $35 billion Georgia reactors. Trump and Elon Musk discussing advisory role in next administration. The UK Is Ramping Up Its Nuclear Energy Ambitions. Call for next UK government to make ‘big decisions’ on nuclear power projects | POLITICS INTERNATIONAL and DIPLOMACY. Rare spat shows China and North Korea still at odds on nuclear weapons. China and Russia Issue Nuclear Warnings. Russian think tank proposes ‘demonstrative’ nuclear blast to deter Western support for Ukraine.The ghost of Concorde stalks the Franco-British nuclear renaissance. |
| SAFETY. 2 aging central Japan nuclear reactors get 20-yr service extensions. Drone sightings reported over British nuclear facilities. | SPACE. EXPLORATION, WEAPONS.US-NATO attack 3 Russian space early warning facilities. Space junk is raining from the sky. Who’s responsible when it hits the Earth?. Elon’s Gone to Mars-https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xi0mVvE9nYQ |
| TECHNOLOGY. Small modular nuclear reactors get a reality check in new report. | URANIUM. Iran’s Near Bomb-Grade Uranium Stock Grows Ahead of Election | WASTES. Pledge sought that laid-up Rosyth subs won’t go to Australia. A robot will soon try to remove melted nuclear fuel from destroyed Fukushima reactor. Fukushima nuclear debris removal to begin as early as August. |
| WAR and CONFLICT. US strike on Russian targets would be ‘start of world war’ – Medvedev. Putin warns West about consequences of long-range strikes on Russia. U.S. concerned about Ukraine strikes on Russian nuclear radar stations. Italy opposes Ukraine using long-range weapons to strike Russia. Israel Continues Gaza Attacks Despite UN Court Order To ‘Immediately Halt’ Rafah Offensive. Operation al-Aqsa Flood’ Day 237: As Israel’s invasion of Rafah and northern Gaza continues, Smotrich calls for ‘war’ on West Bank | WEAPONS and WEAPONS SALES. CNN Analysis Reveals US-Made Munitions Used in Rafah Massacre. Top Biden aides signal openness to letting Ukraine strike Russia with US weapons. US doubtful it could help Korea on nuclear-powered subs. |
Every day between now and the election’: Albanese ignites nuclear fight with Dutton
SMH, By James Massola, June 2, 2024
…………………….. the prime minister highlighted recent CSIRO research that found nuclear power is up to eight times more expensive than large-scale wind or solar power.
“They also found building a single nuclear power plant would cost at least $8.5 billion and take 15 years. At the next election, we will offer voters a choice between renewable energy and nuclear power,” he said.
“We will raise this every day between now and the election. [Dutton] needs to stop hiding his plans and release the locations of these planned nuclear reactors. We will join communities in campaigning against them.”………………………………..
The prime minister said Dutton had promised to look communities that could host nuclear power plants in the eye and engage with them but “he hasn’t been anywhere near [them]”.
“He has not been within 40 kilometres of a coal-fired power station. And he’s saying they’ll have six or more sites. He’s been nowhere near any of them in Gippsland, the Hunter, Flynn, Maranoa, O’Connor, seats like this,” Albanese said.
Back in 2007, when he was infrastructure spokesman in the Kevin Rudd-led opposition, Albanese helped lead Labor’s attack against John Howard’s plans to build nuclear power plants across the country – and he has not forgotten those lessons.
…………………Dutton had initially flagged the nuclear policy would be outlined before last month’s federal budget, but that timeline has since slipped.
This masthead then revealed the Coalition planned to unveil either six or seven sites had been selected to host nuclear power plants in the current parliamentary sitting fortnight but following that report, the opposition pressed pause on the announcement once more.
The Coalition’s policy announcement has now been pencilled in for the week after next, once parliament has risen at the end of next week, and is expected to take place outside of Canberra.
Possible sites for nuclear reactors include the Latrobe Valley in Victoria, the Hunter Valley in NSW, Collie in Western Australia, Port Augusta in South Australia, and even potentially a plant in Nationals leader David Littleproud’s electorate of Maranoa in south-west Queensland. All of these locations are on the site of, or near, current or former coal-fired power plants.
Coalition sources, who asked not to be named so they could detail internal discussions about the policy, said the six or seven MPs who would potentially host nuclear power plants in their seats had been notified.
…………………. Labor strategists believe that once the potential sites are named – all of which are expected to be in Coalition seats – that will sharpen the political debate and force voters to consider the implications of having a power plant in their own seat.
A Dutton-led government, if elected, would face a fight with state Labor premiers including Victoria’s Jacinta Allan, NSW’s Chris Minns and Western Australia’s Roger Cook, who have all hosed down suggestions their states could host nuclear power plants.
Queensland Opposition Leader David Crisafulli, who is widely expected to lead the LNP to victory in a state election in October, has indicated he would not back nuclear power unless it had bipartisan support at a federal level.
Albanese said the Labor government opposed the construction of nuclear power plants in Australia for four main reasons.
“Nuclear reactors are simply wrong for Australia, the International Energy Agency said that this week, they support nuclear reactors but for Australia, given the comparative costs and time frames, it makes no sense given that we have access to the best renewables on Earth, along with hydro, batteries and gas to firm them,” he said.
“Second is nuclear is too slow [to build] to keep the lights on, the CSIRO speak about 15 years at least for it to happen. So you’re talking about 2040 just small modular nuclear reactors and years later, if they want to go down the large-scale route and Australia doesn’t have that time.”
“Third, relates to cost, nuclear will push up power bills – independent analysis from CSIRO, AEMO [the Australian Energy Market Operator], says nuclear is the most expensive form of energy to build. And the fourth is communities don’t want nuclear. That includes state LNP leaders that have said that, local councils, state and indeed even [federal] coalition MPs like Darren Chester and Dan Tehan.”
Back in March, 12 Coalition MPs told this masthead they backed lifting the moratorium on nuclear power in Australia but would not commit to hosting a nuclear power plant in their own electorate.
And Nationals MP Darren Chester, who holds the Victorian seat of Gippsland, which is widely considered a probable pick for a nuclear site, said he would not accept a site unless his community was handed a significant economic package.
https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/every-day-between-now-and-the-election-albanese-ignites-nuclear-fight-with-dutton-20240601-p5jigh.html
If regional communities don’t want a windfarm, why would they accept a nuclear power station?
Guardian, Gabrielle Chan, 4 June 24
The Coalition’s energy policy is leveraged on regional discontent about renewables. But many farmers don’t want nuclear in their back yard either.
Here’s the thing about the Coalition’s latest nuclear policy. It tries to use one of the most contentious issues in rural areas, which is the rollout of renewables and the electricity transmission lines to carry energy around the country, to push an even more controversial energy transition.
Because nuclear power stations would also be built in the regions. And if you’re worried about renewables, hands up who wants a nuclear reactor next door?
My generation grew up with the US-Russian cold war and the Doomsday Clock.
While the conversation and the technology of nuclear energy has moved on, the cost, complexity and construction time has not, as the CSIRO found in a report released last month………………………
If there is one thing that I have learned from calling a country town home, it is that people are very attached to their place and how it is identified.
Not everyone opposes renewables but there is a significant portion of people who don’t want them in their own back yard. Others are quietly making their fortunes, having struck the formula for drought-proofing their businesses for decades to come. If the Big Dry strikes, you will probably find them on a beach somewhere.
That is because annual payments to host turbines start from $40,000 each though I know of agreements that are much higher, especially when communities collectively bargain. The New South Wales government pays landowners $200,000 to host transmission lines in annual instalments over 20 years, with Victoria paying the same over 25 years.
Those payments have crept up because of ongoing regional protests. That action has been amplified by poor community consultation from some energy companies highlighted in the Australian Energy Infrastructure Commissioner Andrew Dyer’s report. He found the rollout had created “material distrust” of developers in some communities.
Discontent is also being amplified for political purposes, including by David Littleproud, Barnaby Joyce and Matt Canavan, who spoke at a rally against renewables at parliament house.
The politics is clear. For starters, the long lead time kicks the nuclear energy can down the road to 2040. The Liberals cannot walk naked into the next election without at least a fig leaf for a net zero policy. The Nationals, on the other hand, don’t give a toss about net zero. They just want to extract the funding from the Liberals in compensation for hosting any technology that delivers on the net zero promise. Nuclear can be that fig leaf.
It is also true the Nats and the country Liberals will have to wear any pushback on where nuclear facilities are placed. They won’t be able to campaign against their own policy like some do on renewables.
Peter Dutton has not, as yet, specifically named any potential sites for a nuclear power station but he has pointed to current coal production facilities that are due to close. His announcement is imminent, perhaps even after the party room meeting on Tuesday.
Possible sites include the Hunter Valley in NSW; Anglesea and Latrobe Valley in Victoria; Port Augusta in South Australia; Collie in Western Australia; and perhaps Tarong in central Queensland – within Littleproud’s Maranoa electorate.
Since then the game has begun to get Coalition MPs to commit to host or rule out a reactor in their own back yard.
This is a bit silly really, because apart from the ACT, which renewable-supporting metropolitan MPs could commit to hosting a wind turbine or a solar farm in their city seats?
Littleproud and Joyce have both indicated their approval to host a reactor. But a dozen others would not commit when asked by Nine newspapers.
Keith Pitt told Nine he supported lifting the moratorium on nuclear power but, alas, there were technical restrictions, including earthquakes in his electorate. But if Pitt is worried about his area, other MPs might be scurrying to the Geoscience Australia map of faultlines for their own get-out-of-jail-free card.
Pitt’s seat of Hinkler looks like a shoo-in compared to the faultlines under Darren Chester’s Gippsland electorate, which covers the Latrobe Valley in Victoria, or the Liberal MP Rick Wilson’s seat of O’Connor, which covers Collie in WA…………………………………………..
Once you combine the feelings of the existing populations with younger populations, does that add up to support for nuclear over renewables in these changing back yards? I wouldn’t bet on it. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/article/2024/jun/04/liberal-coalition-nuclear-power-plant-policy-renewable-energy
