Antinuclear

Australian news, and some related international items

Australian nuclear news 5 -12 May.

Headlines as they come in:

May 6, 2025 Posted by | Uncategorized | Leave a comment

 Nuclear news this week – not industry handouts

A bit of good news – 

 The global nuclear-free movement just had a thumping victory over the nuclear lobby. Australians voted in an unprecedented landslide to reject the Opposition’s pro nuclear policy, and to kick their leader right out of Parliament.

 Australia is the only country in the world that is a nation-continent, a great island -continent with one federal government, and one predominant language. Already with a third of all households having solar power, and a pro-renewable energy government now thoroughly endorsed – Australia is set to be world leader in truly clean energy, and climate action.


TOP STORIES 

NATO leaders as delusional as Zelensky on lost Ukraine war. 

As US military prepares for war on China, Silicon Valley tech oligarchs are profiting

Scotland does not need nuclear power and people aren’t being told the truth.

From the archives. TONY BLAIR: STILL A NUCLEAR NUTTER!.

ClimateArctic plant study reveals an ‘early warning sign’ of climate change upheaval.

Noel’s notesA resounding win for the world’s nuclear-free clean energy movement.AUSTRALIA

Pie in the sky? After the Coalition’s stinging loss, nuclear should be dead. Here’s why it might live onCoalition to put nuclear plan

 on the chopping block-ALSO AT https://antinuclear.net/2025/05/04/coalition-to-put-nuclear-plan-on-the-chopping-block/ 

Nuclear fallout: Coalition’s nuclear energy policy proved toxic to voters. 


NUCLEAR ITEMS 

ATROCITIES. As Israelis Blockade Food to Gaza, 9,000 Children have been Admitted for Acute MalnutritionIsrael Bombs Humanitarian Aid Flotilla on Way to Gaza.
ECONOMICS. EDF seeks joint financing for UK projects.
EDUCATION.  Nuclear infiltrates: Students from three West Cumbrian schools are taking part in a challenge to build robots for the nuclear industry.
ENERGY. Dispatch from France | May ’25.
ENVIRONMENT. Tracing radiation through the Marshall Islands: Reflections from a Greenpeace nuclear specialist. Ohio EPA slams DOE’s sloppy radiation sampling plan for Piketon plant demolition.
ETHICS and RELIGION. Will the World Speak up Against Israel’s Likely Attack on Humanitarian Activists? Pope Francis Refused to Be Silent on Gaza – Will His Successor Follow Suit?
EVENTS. Sign the Petition to Deny LANL’s Request to Release Radioactive Tritium!
HISTORY. The World’s First Nuclear Meltdown: Chalk River | Fascinating Horror – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1WcBIzRzswg Niagara County New York Radiation Disaster -discovered in 2024
LEGAL. The ICJ, Israel and the Gaza Blockade. EDF sues Czech competition authority over Dukovany nuclear tender.
MEDIA. Nuclear power is shaping up as an election loser, and the Murdoch media is not happy.
OPPOSITION to NUCLEAR Updates on Palisades: Zombie reactor & “SMR” new builds. NUKE WASTE DUMP: Ojibwe Country once again targeted.
POLITICS. The Great British nuclear expansion is a project bound to fail. Senator Strangelove.
POLITICS INTERNATIONAL and DIPLOMACY. No Victory in Ukraine: The Costs of Western Delusion. Fantasy and Exploitation: The US-Ukraine Minerals Deal. UK in talks to buy back nuclear sites from French firm EDF.
PUBLIC OPINION. Six in 10 Americans Support US Participation in a Nuclear Agreement with Iran.
SAFETY. NUCLEAR STATION = WAR TARGET. Situation unstable: IAEA says shots were heard at Zaporizhzhia power plant.
SECRETS and LIES.Australia Islamic Caliphate? Dark money and the 11th hour Election propaganda blitzkrieg.Chernobyl’s Hidden Impact: Disinformation and Nuclear Politics.Covering up Ukrainian Nazis is nothing new – the Canadians have been doing it for almost eighty years.US-Ukraine minerals deal ‘hides secret agreements’ – Ukrainian MP.
SPINBUSTER. Campaigner hits out at ‘PR trick’ nuclear energy poll of SNP members.
WASTES. May Day – How Hot is Too Hot for a Ferociously Hot Nuclear Dump Under the Irish Sea-Bed?Sellafield plan for new building to store radioactive waste.
WAR and CONFLICT.Need to use nuclear weapons has not arisen in Ukraine, says Putin.For second time in 3 years Zelensky sabotages Ukraine war peace deal.Why is No. 1 US bombing No. 137 Yemen?India and Pakistan: Nations on brink of ‘nuclear war’.  India and Pakistan: The nuclear standoff that we really should all be worried about. How bloody conflict 4,000 miles away could spark nuclear Armageddon killing billions. Danger of an India-Pakistan war and Canada’s Reactors .
WEAPONS and WEAPONS SALES. Republicans Unveil Bill To Bring 2025 Military Budget to Over $1 Trillion. Europe is drilling for World War III.Shut down Elbit Systems everywhere!

May 6, 2025 Posted by | Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Greens fear AUKUS overreach as State Development Coordination and Facilitation Bill 2025 passes SA parliament

5 May 25 https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/greens-fear-aukus-overreach-as-state-development-coordination-and-facilitation-bill-2025-passes-sa-parliament/news-story/ebc1597b2be17b37be06a0aee565f484

A new $4m planning office will be granted unprecedented powers, sparking calls to temper the power of the four bureaucrats set to wield them.

Sweeping new powers will be invested in a $4m office to fast track “significant” SA projects including housing and AUKUS – raising fears they could avoid tougher planning checks.

The State Government is planning to appoint four staff to the office, including an AUKUS expert, with unprecedented powers to “case manage” projects.

Premier Peter Malinauskas has flagged this would allow faster approvals in designated “go zones” for projects like the AUKUS nuclear-powered submarines, housing and renewable energy projects.

The move flared concerns about existing heritage, environment, coastal protection and pastoral land act processes being downgraded after the State Development Coordination and Facilitation Bill 2025 passed this week.

Mr Malinauskas previously said the law meant the State Government could designate “state development areas” as “go-zones”.

Regulatory work in these zones would be completed before developers moved in “allowing for quicker approvals within them once an application is made”.

This was meant to save time in passing “urgent and significant projects”.

A government spokesperson assured provisions meant the new office must perform any assessment independently and it could not be directed “by any Minister to either approve or reject any application.”

The office could not deal with nuclear waste projects.

And the Adelaide Parklands was protected by the Adelaide Parklands Act and the new bill states it “may never be designated as a state development area”.

But SA Greens party co-leader Robert Simms was still concerned.

He feared the inclusion of an AUKUS expert meant approvals for the project would bypass usual safety guards.

“SA parliament has just given the Malinauskas Government the biggest blank cheque in South Australian history,” he said.

“This bill gives an unelected office the power to override South Australian laws to enable controversial projects, including AUKUS, yet it passed the Upper House in the blink of an eye.”

“This bill isn’t about facilitating housing developments, it’s about giving the state government the power to ride roughshod over the community. It’s a power grab of epic proportions that should have been given much more scrutiny.”

It was confirmed in the senate the office would cost $4m a year to operate.

May 6, 2025 Posted by | politics, South Australia, weapons and war | Leave a comment

Australia lays out red carpet for rapid green energy transition. Can Labor seize the moment?

Giles Parkinson, May 4, 2025, https://reneweconomy.com.au/australia-lays-out-red-carpet-for-rapid-green-energy-transition-can-labor-seize-the-moment/

What an opportunity Australia has before it.

The thumping victory to Labor, unimaginable just months ago, or even while chomping on the democracy sausage on Saturday afternoon, means that the Australian federal government now has a clear mandate to do something great – accelerate the transition to renewables and get really serious about climate targets.

Australia has rejected the Gina Rinehart vision of a nuclear-powered, iron-domed Australia living in climate denial and perpetual fear.

The foot soldiers Australia’s richest person sent into electoral battle, armed with real and imaginary MAGA caps, have been dispatched by voters. Opposition leader Peter Dutton has lost his seat, and energy spokesman Ted O’Brien very nearly did.

There will now be nearly as many independents in the lower house as there are Liberals, or members of the LNP or Nationals. How envious must the Americans feel! Trumpism has been repudiated. Common sense, respect for the science, and empathy has prevailed. And Australia can even be sure there will be another election in three years time. The US, not so much.

It is remarkable that, after two decades of political argy-bargy, the loudest and sanest voices across the floor from Labor will not be from seeking favours from the fossil fuel industry, but from those urging the government to go harder, to aim higher.

Green industry can hardly believe it, and leaders such as Andrew Forrest have already found their voice.

“This result sends a clear and unequivocal message: Australians will back and support policies that recognise the economic opportunities which come from acting on the existential threat of climate change,” Forrest said in a statement on Sunday.

“It shows that any party which seeks to govern this country must have a serious and credible plan to confront the climate crisis.

“In a turbulent world, Australia remains a strong, principled and pragmatic voice. We must now use that voice to back science, seize the green energy opportunity, and strengthen our role in the world with compassion, ambition and purpose.”

Forrest has been outspoken in his criticism of net zero targets, describing them as a “con”, because they essentially let fossil fuels off the hook for real action. He has set a target of “real zero” at his Pilbara iron ore mines by the end of the decade, which means burning no diesel and no gas for electricity or transport by 2030.

It is a stunningly ambitious goal, but in keeping with the need to act decisively on climate change. Australia’s climate targets are still lacklustre, but its government cannot now argue that it does not have the mandate to be bold.

In a few months Australia, which wants to host the 2026 UN climate conference, will need to submit its 2035 emissions reduction target. It has to respect the science. Is Labor satisfied with power for the sake of being in power, or does it wish to leave a lasting legacy, or will we regret it not being in minority government. It likely has another six years to actually Do Something.

But challenges remain, and while the election may be won, that could turn out to be the easy part. Energy and climate minister Chris Bowen and the Labor team have some thinking to do about the best and most equitable way to deliver the second and most challenging part of the green energy transition.

It’s 20 years since John Howard, under intense pressure from a fossil fuel lobby horrified by a proposed extension to the mandatory renewable energy target that would have doubled the share of wind and solar from 1 pct to 2 per cent of generation, threw that policy out the door.

Australia is now at 40 per cent renewables, aiming to double that to 82 per cent renewables by 2030. South Australia, already at more than 70 per cent wind and solar, aims to reach 100 per cent “net renewables” by the end of 2027.

Bowen’s big challenge to deliver that federal target is to ensure that enough wind and solar gets built in time, and at scale. Challenges remain in equipment supplies, inflation in civil construction costs, and securing a skilled labour force – and the likes of Barnaby Joyce in the principality of New England will not easily give up their fight.

Bowen’s focus will be making sure that the Capacity Investment Scheme delivers wind, solar and storage in the right timeframe, but even that won’t be enough to reach the party’s target.

Policies and planning blueprints will need to adapt. The Tim Nelson review of market rules and incentives will be critical, as will the next edition of the Integrated System Plan. More needs to be done to encourage electrification, consumer energy resources, and alternatives to big transmission and renewable energy zones.

And there is going to be fascinating debate among the grid experts about how to manage the final stages of this transition from a centralised grid dominated by fossil fuels, to a distributed, inverter-based system built around consumer assets, large-scale wind and solar, and storage.

Australia is at the forefront of this transition, and the Australian public, and particularly its media, needs to get its head around the issues, because consumers are going to be at the heart of this – and they needed to be informed, not misled.

“Now is the time for conviction and courage to double down and move at the speed the climate science dictates,” says Tim Buckley, from Climate and Energy Finance. “There are plenty of challenges, but the risks and costs of too-slow action are clear. This is an intergenerational game changer moment!”

May 6, 2025 Posted by | energy | Leave a comment

Australians choose batteries over nuclear after election fought on energy

While the Greens have an anxious wait ahead to see how many lower seats they’ll win, they recorded their highest-ever primary vote and will hold the balance of power in the Senate with 11 senators.

While the Greens have an anxious wait ahead to see how many lower seats they’ll win, they recorded their highest-ever primary vote and will hold the balance of power in the Senate with 11 senators.

ABC News, By climate reporters Jess Davis and Jo Lauder, 6 May 25

When Peter Dutton unveiled his party’s nuclear energy plan last year, it opened up a seismic difference between the two major parties.

It offered a real choice for Australian voters over the future of the country’s energy policy.

“I’m very happy for the election to be a referendum on energy, on nuclear, on power prices, on lights going out, on who has a sustainable pathway for our country going forward,” he said.

Taken on those terms, Saturday’s election outcome was an endorsement of renewable energy over nuclear.

“It’s clearly a referendum on energy policy, given the prominence of energy throughout the entire election campaign,” Clean Energy Council CEO Kane Thornton said.

“I think it’s an emphatic victory for Australia’s transition to clean energy.”

At a household level, Labor offered a significant discount on home batteries to accompany the booming solar on rooftops all across the country, aiming to get 1 million batteries installed under the scheme by 2030.

The last election saw a new generation of independents join the parliament, riding a wave of climate concern. Any expectation that the “teals” were a single-election trend has been dispelled, with most of them set to be returned, and new ones joining their ranks.

While the Greens have an anxious wait ahead to see how many lower seats they’ll win, they recorded their highest-ever primary vote and will hold the balance of power in the Senate with 11 senators.

After losing the Liberal heartland to the teals in the last election, the Coalition decided to pitch instead to the outer suburbs.

But the decision to campaign against renewables, and scrap climate policies such as the EV tax breaks, seems to mismatch the views of middle Australia.

Outer suburbs embrace solar power

Dutton set out to make up gains in the outer suburbs by offering a discount on the fuel excise. But the data for solar uptake and electric cars paints a very different picture to the caricature of solar and batteries as a plaything for the inner city.

While energy may not have been a top concern for voters, it’s the outer suburbs where our love for rooftop solar is at its highest, especially in Queensland and Western Australia.

In Dutton’s former electorate of Dickson, some 60 per cent of households have a solar system, double the national average, according to data from the Clean Energy Regulator………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-05-06/federal-election-shows-voters-support-renewables-over-nuclear/105252888

May 6, 2025 Posted by | energy, politics | Leave a comment

State Liberals nuke nuclear promise

The SA Liberals have broken a key election promise with just 10 months to go until the state poll, with Liberal leader Vincent Tarzia dumping his party’s only energy policy.

5 May 25,https://www.premier.sa.gov.au/media-releases/news-items/state-liberals-nuke-nuclear-promise

In a stunning backdown, Mr Tarzia admitted on ABC Radio Adelaide that the Liberals’ election commitment to hold a Royal Commission into nuclear energy would be dumped in the wake of the federal election:

Rory McClaren: That’s what I was going to ask you… should nuclear from a Liberal Party policy perspective now be parked?

Vincent Tarzia: Yes, at the moment it’s been comprehensively rejected and we know the thing is with the energy transition, in three years’ time we will be in another position again.

The State Liberals made the pursuit of nuclear power their top priority, announcing their pursuit of a Royal Commission as their key commitment in their Budget Reply speech in June.

In August, Liberal Leader Vincent Tarzia appointed Stephen Patterson as Shadow Minister for Nuclear Readiness.

Now, just eight months later, the promise has been abandoned.

The 2016 Nuclear Fuel Cycle Royal Commission found nuclear power was not commercially viable in South Australia.

Quotes

Attributable to Tom Koutsantonis

What do the South Australian Liberals stand for?

They’re breaking election promises even before they’ve got to an election.

Only a few months ago, they were making the pursuit of nuclear energy their sole energy policy focus. Now, they’ve dumped it.

Vincent Tarzia must now dump his Shadow Minister for Nuclear Readiness, who has absolutely no policy offering other than the pursuit of an energy source that evidence shows will drive up bills for South Australians.

At a time when the Opposition should be outlining its policy platform ahead of the 2026 State Election, the State Liberals are instead ditching their only energy policy.

May 6, 2025 Posted by | politics, South Australia | Leave a comment