Jillian Segal and the Israel Lobby’s TERRIFYING Plan for Australia
Join criminal lawyer Nick Hanna as he investigates Jillian Segal, her history of pro-Israel lobbying, and why her so-called plan to combat antisemitism threatens to undermine free speech in Australia.
0:00 Intro
1:38 Who is Jillian Segal?
3:39 Antisemitism vs anti-zionism
5:48 IHRA definition of antisemitism
7:50 The pro-Israel lobby’s IHRA campaign
16:18 Appointment of Segal as Special Envoy to Combat Antisemitism
18:15 Why was Segal chosen?
20:13 Segal x Australia-Israel Chamber of Commerce
24:35 Does Segal have a conflict of interests? 28:17 Segal x Weizmann Institute of Science
29:31 The Plan to Combat Antisemitism
39:35 Outro
The What & The Why is an investigative journalism podcast by criminal lawyer and filmmaker, Nicholas Hanna.
AUKUS Submarine Regulations: FoE Adelaide submission
Friends of the Earth Adelaide > Publications > Adelaide FoE Notes > AUKUS Submarine Regulations: FoE Adelaide submission
Philip White July 24, 2025, https://adelaidefoe.org/aukus-submarine-regulations-foe-adelaide-submission/
Friends of the Earth Adelaide today (24 July 2025) sent a submission in response to the government’s call for public comments on draft Australian Naval Nuclear Power Safety Regulations. These Regulations were drafted under the Australian Naval Nuclear Power Safety Act, which was passed in October last year. Our submission can be accessed here.
The consultation is open until 30 July 2025. Details can be found on the following web site: https://www.defence.gov.au/about/reviews-inquiries/australian-naval-nuclear-power-safety-regulations-public-consultation
FoE Adelaide’s submission can be summarised as follows:
— AUKUS should be cancelled. It compromises Australia’s sovereignty and is not in our strategic, economic, or environmental interests.
— If it is not cancelled, there should be a proper consultation about the Stirling and Osborne designated zones, which were declared in the Australian Naval Nuclear Power Safety Act without consultation.
— The principles of “free, prior and informed consent” should be followed in siting any site for storage and disposal of radioactive waste.
— That includes respecting laws of State and Territory governments that restrict or prohibit siting of nuclear waste facilities.
— The Regulator must be completely independent of the Defence portfolio. In the current proposal it will be answerable to the Minister for Defence.
— All submissions should be published in full, unless the submitter specifically requests otherwise. Government representatives informed us on 17 July at a public forum in Port Adelaide that they only intend to publish a summary put together by bureaucrats.
1 This month
of the week – Disrupting War & Militarism in Oceania. Active solidarity. Radical practice.
Antinuclear 