Antinuclear

Australian news, and some related international items

Victoria’s Ararat wind farm project in jeopardy, due to uncertainty over Renewable Energy Target

wind-turb-smWind future up in the air with renewable energy target uncertainty http://www.thecourier.com.au/story/2301438/wind-future-up-in-the-air-with-renewable-energy-target-uncertainty/?cs=12  By KARA IRVING May 22, 2014, THE developer of the Ararat Wind Farm project believes the federal government’s renewable energy target (RET) review has caused uncertainty among green energy developers, investors and retailers. RES Australia is behind the $450 million Ararat Wind Farm to be built on the Pyrenees Highway about 17 kilometres from Ararat. Head of development Annette Deveson said the ongoing RET review had stirred uncertainty in the green energy sector.

“We are working very hard to get the Ararat Wind Farm ready for construction,” Ms Deveson said. “But the government is causing uncertainty in the industry and for us.” The federal government is currently reviewing the RET to examine the operation, costs and benefits of the scheme.

The RET was developed to ensure 20 per cent of Australia’s electricity comes from renewable sources by 2020. 

Although a decision had yet to be made about the renewable energy targets, Ms Deveson said the review had caused difficulties for prospective green energy developers. They are not out there in the market looking for new projects,” she said. “As a business you are uncertain of your future market.”

Ms Deveson said the potential change impacted on investor confidence. Ararat Rural City Council last Friday made a submission to the RET review to pledge the importance of the project. 

Mayor Paul Hooper said it was likely the wind farm would not be built because of the review. The project will create 13 full time jobs after the construction has finished,” he said. “About $75,000 will be put back into community grants.”Mr Harper said the Ararat community would miss out if the project were to cease.“We will not see those benefits come to town, nor the long term employment opportunities,” he said.

“The community misses out.” kara.irving@fairfaxmedia.com.au

May 23, 2014 Posted by | Victoria, wind | Leave a comment

Tasmania’s successful renewable energy industry faces loss of investment if Renewable Energy Target is scrapped

map-tasmania-wind.1Hydro Tasmania warns scrapping Renewable Energy Target will kill off investment http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-05-19/hydro-tasmania-warns-scrapping-renewable-energy-target-will-kil/5463404 By Lucy Shannon Australia’s largest renewable energy generator Hydro Tasmania has warned major projects will not go ahead if the Federal Government scraps the Renewable Energy Target Scheme.

The scheme, established by the Howard Government in 2001, aims to have 20 per cent of Australia’s electricity coming from renewable sources by 2020.

The Federal Government is reviewing the RET scheme, as required under legislation. Prime Minister Tony Abbott has faced strong internal pressure to scrap the target from both the Nationals and many Liberals who believe it has pushed up power prices.

Hydro Tasmania, a state-owned business, has made its submission to the review panel. Hydro Chief Stephen Davy says the RET has stimulated $18 billion worth of investment across the country. Mr Davy says if the scheme is scrapped the proposed $2 billion dollar wind farm for Tasmania’s King Island will not go ahead.

“It would almost certainly terminate any further investment in large scale renewable energy projects, and put at risk the long term viability of existing renewable energy assets,” he said.

A second electricity interconnector with Victoria would also be unlikely.

Hydro ‘vital to economy’

The submission points to the “vital and ongoing economic contribution” Hydro makes to Tasmania’s economy. It says more than $60 million was spent with Tasmanian businesses to support the construction of the Musselroe wind farm and more than 200 workers will be employed over the life of the project.

Mr Davy says with the expected abolition of the carbon price the RET is the “only long-term, large scale policy that can drive the uptake of zero-emissions energy sources.”

Last year, Hydro Tasmania announced a record pre-tax profit of $238 million dollars largely on the back of the carbon price which added $70 million to its coffers.

The Greens Senator, Christine Milne says Tasmania should be very fearful of the Government’s review.

“It’s been clear from the start that this is a sham, virtually all the people they’ve got on the review are climate sceptics, they support the old fossil fuel sector and they see renewable energy as competition to the old order,” she said. A spokesman for Greg Hunt says the review’s terms of reference specifically mention sovereign risk as an issue that will be considered by the panel.

There is no fixed date yet for when the report will be delivered.

May 20, 2014 Posted by | Tasmania, wind | Leave a comment

Victoria’s Premier Napthine pledges support fo wind energy: I wish I could believe him,

ballot-boxSmNapthine pledges continued push for renewable energy investment http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-05-19/napthine-pledges-continued-push-for-renewable/5461022 19 May 2014,  Premier Denis Napthine says he will work with renewable energy companies in south-west Victoria, amid concerns about their future.

The Federal Government axed the Australian Renewable Energy Agency and Clean Energy Finance Corporation in last week’s budget.

It is also reviewing the Renewable Energy Target.

Portland-based company Keppel Prince makes towers for wind turbines and says 150 jobs are at risk.

Dr Napthine says he hopes planned projects go ahead.

“We’ll continue to work with the Federal Government, work with the alternative energy industry, whether it’s wind energy, geothermal energy and wave energy, to see what prospects there are to continue investment in alternative energy under the new frameworks,” he said.

May 20, 2014 Posted by | politics, Victoria, wind | Leave a comment

Lady Elliot Island to add wind and solar to its existing hybrid energy

map-Lady-Elliot-IslandMore renewable energy in the wind for Lady Elliot Island http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-05-12/more-renewable-energy-in-the-wind-for-lady-elliot/5445804 By Frances Adcock  Operators on Lady Elliot Island, north-east of Bundaberg, will consider installing wind generators to further improve the island’s energy efficiency.

One-hundred new solar panels will be installed at the island’s hybrid solar power station, which has provided more than half of the island’s power since 2008.

The island’s resort manager, Peter Gash, wants the island to become even more reliant on renewable energy.

“By Christmas we’d hope to do it by, we’d like to install a 10 kilowatt wind generator which will continue to feed power into the battery and into the grid, night and day, and if we can get the success we are hoping for with our 10 to 12 kilowatt wind generator and our 73 kilowatt of solar we will be hopeful we will be somewhere up around 90 per cent renewable,” he said.

He says after the installation of the new panels, more than 70 per cent of the island will be reliant on renewable energy. “We have a barge coming out on Wednesday and there is 125 panels on that and they are 260 watts per panel and they will go up on two separate roofs, and that’s a 16 and 17 kilowatt system,” he said.

“So another 33 kilowatts, so another 125 panels, so that puts us up at 73 kilowatts of power which is a substantial amount of power.”

May 13, 2014 Posted by | Queensland, solar, wind | Leave a comment

Evidence mounts on benefits of Renewable Energy target: South Australia’s wind energy success

Map-South-Australia-windSouth Australian Wind Power – Economical And Effective http://www.energymatters.com.au/index.php?main_page=news_article&article_id=4299 A new report shows wind power in South Australia has not increased wholesale electricity prices, nor created a need for additional back-up power generation capacity.

   Around a quarter of South Australia’s electricity is now sourced from wind power; growing substantially from just 6% in 2005/6.
   
The eight year study of South Australia’s electricity sector by Windlab Systems shows during the period between 2005 and 2013, wholesale electricity prices have not risen, even if the full cost of the renewable energy certificates (REC) is included. Publicly available data from the Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO) was utilised for the study.
 
Reliance on expensive and emission-intensive peaking power plants has reduced as have electricity imports from Victoria states the report. Windlab says electricity related carbon emissions have plummeted 34% even though power consumption has remained stable.
  
“The findings should provide clear guidance to the Federal Government’s Renewable Energy Target (RET) review panel that wind energy and by association the RET should not be a scapegoat for explaining increases in domestic and business energy costs,” says Roger Price, the CEO of Windlab.  “The study further underpins the conclusions of the Clean Energy Council’s commissioned report into the positive cost implications of the RET.”
  
The Clean Energy Council report indicates abolishing Australia’s Renewable Energy Target (RET) would see Australian households paying billions more for electricity.
  
A copy of Windlab’s study report can be viewed here (PDF).
  
The evidence is mounting that the benefits of Australia’s Renewable Energy Target far outweigh the costs. Even so, there are fears the RET review is heading towards a “predetermined and biased outcome” that will result in the loss of thousands of jobs, billions of dollars of investment and also create additional financial burden on Australian households and businesses.

May 13, 2014 Posted by | South Australia, wind | Leave a comment

Economically depressed North Tasmania stands to lose wind farm project if Renewable Energy Target is cut.

wind-turb-smRenewable energy fears for wind farm http://www.examiner.com.au/story/2274842/renewable-energy-fears-for-wind-farm/?cs=95  By EMILY BAKER 12 May 14, CUTS to the renewable energy target could affect a wind farm planned for the state’s economically depressed North, the project’s developer says.  Low Head Wind Farm founder and director Shane Bartel yesterday said any significant cuts to the target would affect the $60 million wind farm proposed for an area east of Low Head.

Mr Bartel said the project would hire between 30 and 50 contractors in the building phase and employ five to 10 people post- construction.The project was partly driven by the federal target of 20 per cent renewable electricity production by 2020, which is under review.Low Head Wind Farm’s development application has been submitted to the government.”It’s up to the Commonwealth to approve that – we’re still working with them on that,” Mr Bartel said.

“I certainly think (a decision will be made) this month … to date, there have been no serious issues with it.”

The Australian reported on Saturday that Hydro Tasmania – which has power-purchasing agreements for its major Tasmanian wind farms Musselroe and Woolnorth – would suffer financially if there were significant cuts to the renewable energy target.

The state-owned company would not comment on the report leaked to the national newspaper but said ongoing reviews of the target had created uncertainty around wind farm revenues. “Hydro Tasmania did not confirm to The Australian the losses claimed in the story,” a statement from Hydro Tasmania said.

“It is our expectation that a positive outcome from the RET review will in fact make these figures meaningless, and our wind farm investments will be delivering the expected returns.”

Clean Energy Council deputy chief executive Kane Thornton said more than $10 billion of investment in renewable energy would be damaged if the scheme was changed. “Leaving the policy alone would create approximately 18,400 jobs by the end of the decade, additional investment of $15 billion in large-scale renewable energy and lower power bills over the medium term,” he said.

May 12, 2014 Posted by | Tasmania, wind | Leave a comment

National Health and Medical Research Council finds no evidence of wind turbines negatively affecting health

wind-turbines-and-sheep

NHMRC says evidence scant in wind turbine health debate  ABC News 10 may 14 An initial report from the National Health and Medical Research Council has found no reliable evidence that wind turbines have a direct physical effect on health…….The review of submissions to the draft report is under-way and the final report is due out within the next few months.http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-05-09/tch-nhmrc-wind-health-research/5442148

May 10, 2014 Posted by | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, wind | Leave a comment

Massive wind farm project approved by Tasmania’s West Coast Council

WIND-FARM$200m wind farm on west coast passes another hurdle http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-05-09/24200m-wind-farm-on-west-coast-passes-another-hurdle/5441192 9 May 2014 Up to 200 jobs could be created on Tasmania’s west coast after the approval of a massive wind farm project.

The $200 million Granville Harbour project has passed another hurdle after gaining approval from West Coast Council. The proponent Westcoast Wind wants to build 33 turbines which will link to Reece Dam via an 11 kilometre transmission line. The Environment Protection Authority approved the project last month and handed it back to the council to assess.

West Coast Mayor Robyn Gerrity says it was given the green light at a special council meeting last night. “It’s a great boost for us, more job creation to saddle onto the new mining developments that are happening over the next 12 to 18 months,” she said.

The venture is still looking for investors.Last month, the proponents said they were not confident of finding investors while the Federal Government reviews the Renewable Energy Target.

May 10, 2014 Posted by | Tasmania, wind | Leave a comment

Wind haters control Abbott government policy – poor prospects for future wind energy development

Parkinson-Report-This may be as good as it gets for Australian wind energy http://reneweconomy.com.au/2014/may-good-gets-australian-wind-energy-72276 By Giles Parkinson on 6 May 2014  New data released on Monday suggested that Australia in the month of April had reached its record level of output for wind energy – 4.6 per cent of total generation from the National Electricity Market.

That is a fine and welcome achievement, albeit modest in the global context, and follows a two year period where the share of black coal generation has also reached record lows – with the added benefit of lower emissions, lower wholesale electricity prices, and more jobs. But for Australia, this may be about as good as it gets for wind energy in the foreseeable future.  A few projects being completed this year might take the total output from Australian wind farms close to 5 per cent of total generation, but on current settings it will be unlikely to get much further. Policy uncertainty – around the carbon price and the renewable energy target – has effectively brought the development of the Australian wind industry to a halt, and the Abbott government might extend that hiatus for another few years, depending on the outcome of the renewable energy policy review.
If, and when, the policy levers or the market conditions change, then large scale solar is likely to displace much of the wind capacity currently in the pipeline. Right now, there is little optimism in the industry for any positive policy levers to be left in place by the current government. Treasurer Joe Hockey last week caused consternation over his comments that wind turbines near Canberra were “utterly offensive. This followed Prime Minister Tony Abbott’s comments last November that those same turbines were “growing like mushrooms”, and were expensive and unreliable. Abbott’s office, advised by wind-hating business types such as Maurice Newman, is taking charge of the current review of the renewable energy target, appointing yet another climate science skeptic in Dick Warburton, who has said he believes nuclear is the only valid alternative to coal, as its chief. t all appears to be a massive blow to the ambitions of many international and local wind farm developers.
Right now, the biggest project under development is the part-completed 270MW Snowtown 2 project in South Australia. A few wind farms are under construction in NSW – all financed pre-2013 – while Pacific Hydro received funding  from the Clean Energy Finance Corporation for a 47MW addition to its Portland project. The 200MW of wind energy to help meet the ACT government’s ambitious 90 per cent renewable energy target, might be the only other new wind farms added to the market over the next four to five years, apart from an extension to Pacific New Zealand company TrustPower, which is building Snowtown 2, has another 7 wind farms ready to go in Australia, but indicated last month to analysts that few, if any, had a chance to be developed if the RET was severely diluted.
A cut in the fixed target from 41,000GWh to 27,000GWh, a widely tipped outcome, could mean that only two of these wind farms will be cost efficient enough to be built by 2019. RES Australia, a subsidiary of UK-based RES Group, said a $450 million wind farm ready to build – and with strong community and council support – in Victoria, would not go ahead if the RET was changed. “We are concerned that the Government may be considering a reduction of the RET on a false premise it will save consumers money – when in reality, cutting the RET will demonstrably increase our energy bills in the long term,” RES Australia development manager Daniel Leahy said in a statement on Monday. Australia’s biggest home-grown renewable energy companies, Pacific Hydro and Infigen Energy, now invest more money in international projects than they do in Australia. Pacific Hydro is focused on South America, particularly Brazil and Chile, where wind energy is undercutting the cost of fossil fuels in Brazil and solar energy is also competing with coal in Chile. Infigen is investing in new solar projects in the US, which are competing with gas-fired projects for new generation.
The situation at state level is no better – apart from South Australia, which accounts for around 40 per cent of Australia’s wind farm developments to date, is likely to meet its 33 per cent renewable energy target six years ahead of schedule. The Victorian industry has been held back by planning changes introduced by former Premier Ted Baillieu, NSW has appointed a new planning minister who describes wind turbines as “hideous”, as Queensland has not installed a single wind turbine in its state since the 12-MW wind farm at Windy Hill project on the Atherton Tablelands was built 15 years ago. (Apart from a couple of small turbines on Thursday Island, and one at the CSIRO research centre in Newcastle, they are the only wind turbines north of Sydney).
The Queensland state government shows no inclination of doing any more, arguing that the RET should be scrapped altogether. WA is fighting back against renewable energy developments, and industry people think it will be at least 5 years until a new wind farm is constructed in that state.
There are a couple of “mega projects” that could get developed in the right conditions. These include the 600MW Ceres project in South Australia, and Hydro Tasmania’s plans for a possible 600MW project on King Island. Other nearer term options include the Hornsdale wind project in South Australia. For most undeveloped wind projects, including the combination of antipathy from state and federal conservative governments, delays and deferrals in key policies such as the RET, the proposed dismantling of the CEFC and the def-funding of the Australian Renewable Energy Agency paints a bleak picture. And by the time that the policy environment could change, large scale solar – at least projects built to a 10-50MW scale – could be the most attractive option for renewable energy developers. This would be due to scale, project delivery, speed of construction, acceptance by residents, and finally on pricing – with solar costs likely to fall towards wind energy prices, and have the advantage of producing during the day, when the energy value is higher. It’s a bleak prospect. Little wonder that industry insiders say staff are either looking for opportunities overseas, or in different technologies

 

May 7, 2014 Posted by | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, wind | Leave a comment

As Australia’s coal industry winds down, wind energy surges ahead

wind-nuclear-Wind energy surges to record share as coal ebbs May 5, 2014  Environment Editor, The Sydney Morning Herald Wind energy’s share of Australia’s main electricity market jumped to a record last month, helping to curb emissions from the power sector even as hydro output shrank, according to energy consultancy Pitt & Sherry.

Wind farms, derided last week by Treasurer Joe Hockey as “utterly offensive” blights on the landscape, increased their share of the market to a record 4.6 per cent, up one percentage point from a year earlier, the company said in its monthly CEDEX report.

With major black-coal fired plants such as Liddell and Bayswater in NSW continuing to operate well short of capacity, greenhouse gas emissions from the National Electricity Market for the month were 5.8 million tonnes lower than a year earlier, or down 3.5 per cent.

Coal’s share of the market remained near its record low of 73.8 per cent.

However, the shift away from coal may soon be reversed as politics and markets combine to alter the economics of energy.

The Abbott government remains steadfast in its plans to remove the carbon tax – now at $24.15 a tonne – which has helped make black coal-fired plants, in particular, relatively expensive.

Senior members, including Prime Minister Tony Abbott, have also signalled their intent to weaken the Renewable Energy Target, a move likely to freeze new investments in wind farms………

Broken promise in the offing?

Mark Butler, the opposition’s climate change spokesman, said the Abbott government was “crab-walking” away from its pre-election promise to leave the Renewable Energy Target unchanged at 41,000 gigawatt-hours by 2020.

The government has set up a review of the target, led by climate change sceptic Dick Warburton, with many in the clean energy industry fearing the panel will recommend a delay and or weakening of the goals.

“This is a just another broken promise driven by ideology in face of the clear evidence that this has been a major policy success,” Mr Butler said.

While falling energy demand has contributed to falling emissions, “the big driver” for the industry has been the rise of renewables, he said.

Two-thirds of the emissions drop has been “because renewable energy increased its market share by 25 per cent in the first 12 months” of the carbon tax’s start, he said.  http://www.smh.com.au/environment/climate-change/wind-energy-surges-to-record-share-as-coal-ebbs-20140505-zr4rg.html#ixzz30zIKSJIQ

 

May 6, 2014 Posted by | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, wind | Leave a comment

Some Australians are finding Joe Hockey’s opinion on wind energy offensive and silly

Hockey-and-windJoe Hockey’s turbine huff stokes coals of discontent WA Today, 4 May 14
 Lynette Byrnes Mr Hockey finds wind turbines “utterly offensive” as he drives past them on his way to Canberra (” ‘Utterly offensive’: Hockey tilts at windmills and puts green lobby on notice”, May 3-4). Would he rather be evacuated permanently from his home because of radiation fallout as have the residents near Fukushima nuclear plant? Would he rather suffer chronic asthma from dust pollution from coal mines like Hunter Valley residents? Would he rather more global warming for all of us if we rely more on coal and gas power? Maybe being offended by wind farms is the least of our energy worries.Or perhaps we should relocate Parliament to the upper Hunter Valley so Mr Hockey can enjoy the views of “attractive” coal mines and power stations instead as he drives past? 
Sue Graykowski I am offended by Joe Hockey’s reference to the wind turbines near Lake George as a blight on the landscape. I don’t know what turned him into a “windmillgynist” – a bad holiday in Holland perhaps? I’m a tad biased, but I love them and not just for their aesthetics but for their pioneering of the inevitable: an Earth dependent on renewable energy and without Joe Hockey’s silly views.

Simeon Glasson Mr Hockey is right. As a lover of nature I agree with him 100 per cent. Wind farms are an offensive blight on nature’s beauty. As are open-cut coal mines, gold mines, uranium mines, and iron ore mines. The buildings around Sydney Harbour including the Opera House and Harbour Bridge surely spoil the sublime beauty of what must have been a pristine environment before white man arrived. LNG terminals on the (no longer so) Great Barrier Reef? Say no more. I suggest we do away with human civilisation altogether – leave the planet in all its original glory. Hmmm – maybe it’s too late for that.

So unless Mr Hockey wants to live in the Dark Ages let’s keep the wind farms – they look at least as good as some of the alternative sources of energy without the enormous environmental cost.

Andy Royal Joe Hockey is entitled to dislike wind turbines and hold other foolish opinions but he should not try to ram his “ideas” down other people’s throats or, worse, threaten to withdraw government support for green power initiatives designed to help secure a safe and secure future for our children.

Kevin Atkins  Joe Hockey, of North Sydney, the epicentre of ugly concrete and steel monstrosities, is offended by a few scattered wind turbines in country Australia which are a “blight on the landscape”. Astonishing.

Doug Steley  Joe Hockey says wind farms are “utterly offensive” and “a blight on the landscape”. I did not see him in Morewell when it was covered in toxic choking smoke and ash from the brown-coal-fired power station mine fire recently.

If he thinks a coal-fired power station is more attractive than wind turbines then I would suggest he moves and chooses to live closer to one of them.

Mona Finley Mr Hockey’s opinion of wind farms as ‘‘a blight on the landscape’’ could well go down as one of those ‘‘silly chump’’ statements that will have future generations spluttering with disbelief. Beauty is truly in the eye of the beholder, and every time I have caught sight of wind turbines, whether in Europe, New Zealand, or Australia, they appeared to me like art installations or sculpture – gleaming white, so tall and graceful, vanes turning in a meditative manner – and on top of all that, they’re producing lovely pollution-free energy. What’s not to like?

Anne Cooper I see the wind farms on the road to Canberra and am transfixed by their clean lines and simple efficiency. Conversely, a drive through the blighted Hunter Valley coal region is truly offensive. Get some perspective, Mr Hockey. Wind turbines are just big versions of the iconic Aussie windmills.

Thos Puckett Given his tilt at “utterly offensive” wind farms is the Treasurer the Joe Quixote of the 21st century?…….http://www.watoday.com.au/comment/smh-letters/joe-hockeys-turbine-huff-stokes-coals-of-discontent-20140504-zr4ae.html#ixzz30sXmyRE3

May 5, 2014 Posted by | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, wind | Leave a comment

Australia’s Treasurer Joe Hockey on the attack against wind energy

Parkinson-Report-What hope green energy? Hockey says turbines “utterly offensive” http://reneweconomy.com.au/2014/hope-green-energy-hockey-says-turbines-utterly-offensive-72824  By  on 2 May 2014  The prospects of a re-start of large scale renewable energy projects in Australia dimmed further on Friday when Treasurer Joe Hockey described the sight of wind turbines as “utterly offensive.” Hockey, speaking to ultra-conservative shock-jock Alan Jones on radio 2GB, said wind turbines were a “blight on the landscape” and vowed to axe “the vast number” of environmental agencies

Hockey’s comments were made after Jones asked him about the “nonsense” of climate change, and renewable energy policies, and asked why – when the government had rejected support for SPC Admona and car makers – was it “chasing” Thai and Chinese-made wind turbines.

This is the conversation from there:

Hockey: “If I can be a little indulgent, I drive to Canberra to go to parliament and I must say I find those wind turbines around Lake George to be utterly offensive.”

Jones: “Correct.”

Hockey: “I think they’re just a blight on the landscape.”

Jones: “Correct. The people you are talking to are paying for them. When are you going to knock them off?”

Hockey-and-wind

Hockey: (chuckling) “Well, we can’t knock those ones off, they are into locked into a scheme. There is a certain contractual obligation, I’m told, associated with those things. But you will see in the  budget we will address the massive duplication that you have talked about, the vast number of agencies involved in the same thing. We have considered that very carefully. When I say we’ve seen the age of entitlement, that applies to business as much as it applies to the rest of us.”

Hockey also told Jones that the government would cut a swathe through environmental agencies, including, he said, the Clean Energy Regulator, which environment minister Greg Hunt says we need to manage and operate the emissions reduction fund in the ludicrous Direct Action scheme.

Hockey probably meant the Clean Energy Finance Corporation. Attention to detail has not been the government’s strong point, and it has been determined to dismantle any authority or scheme with the words “clean” or “climate” or “carbon” in front of it – the carbon price, the Climate Commission, the Climate Change Authority – even the Cleantech awards had to be renamed.

The CEFC,  along with the Export Finance Investment Corporation, attracts private funds, and delivers a positive return to the government. But even EFIC has been slated for closure in what the AFR’s Chanticleer columnist described as one of a series of “brain explosions” from the Far Right revealed in the National Audit Commission.

The wind turbines around Lake George that Hockey finds so offensive are part of Infigen Energy’s Capital wind farm (pictured). Neighbouring regions areas are a hot-bed of anti-wind farm activitism, particularly from business leaders such as Maurice Newman, Abbott’s hand-picked head of his business advisory body.

Local state MP Pru Goward, the newly appointed  minister of planning for NSW, has described wind turbines as “hideous”, and federal MP Angus Taylor is one of the many fierce opponents of wind farms in the Coalition. Amid all this, the ACT government is trying to commission 200MW of wind capacity as part of its plans to go 90 per cent renewable.

The federal government, on the other hand, appears comfortable with 90 per cent fossil fuels. It has commissioned a review panel to assess the renewable energy target, and has chosen a team led by climate change denier Dick Warburton, who has said that nuclear energy is the only viable alternative to coal, to make a judgement on the scheme that is designed to bring in more wind and solar energy to the energy system.

The constant uncertainty about green energy policy has meant that no new large scale wind farms have been committed in Australia since 2012 – apart from some solar farms supported by other schemes, and the massive investment by Australian households in rooftop solar. The emergence of solar, and soon enough storage, as a cost competitive alternative to energy delivered through expensive networks, is causing Australia’s major utilities to reassess their business models, and the way they deliver electricity. However, they lament that politicians and regulators are looking to the past, rather than the future.

The fossil fuel industry, and other vested interests, have argued that all renewable support mechanisms should be dismantled, or at least vastly reduced, in order to protect the value of existing assets.

They have argued, as has Tony Abbott, that the renewables scheme is very expensive, even though regulators note that it adds only about 3 per cent to consumer bills.

The Clean Energy Council this week produced a report that suggested that the fall in wholesale prices caused by the influx of renewables would offset the cost of certificates and actually lead to cheaper bills for consumers in the medium to long term.

This assessment was rejected by Hunt this week. And in a further sign of the government’s, and the panel’s hard-line attitude to renewables, Warburton said a complete dismantling of the renewable energy target could not be ruled out, even though this would lead to billions of dollars in losses, and to the removal of the “contractual obligation” that Hockey appeared to lament.

The Australian Renewable Energy Agency is also in danger of having its funding stripped and of being absorbed back into a government department.

May 3, 2014 Posted by | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, politics, wind | Leave a comment

Renewable energy and carbon price are financial winners for Tasmania

map-tasmania-wind.1Tasmania wins from pollution price http://christine-milne.greensmps.org.au/campaigns/tasmania-wins-pollution-price 21 March 14,  Since the government made big businesses pay for their greenhouse pollution, Tasmanians have come out ahead because the money raised is used to help low-income earners, and invest in clean energy.

Tasmanians who earned $80,000 or less got a permanent tax cut, and the amount you earn before you pay tax was increased from $6,900 to $18,200.

More than 295,000 Tasmanians had permanent rises in their Age Pension, Disability Pension, Carer Allowance, Newstart Allowance, Youth Allowance, Austudy and Abstudy payments, special benefits and Family Tax Benefit A and B.

Tasmanian businesses received $13 million in grants to help their energy efficiency, and $14.9 million went to farmers and landcare groups to protect our soil, wildlife and bush from the effects of climate change.

Part of the funding raised by the price on pollution is also being used to fund investment in more clean renewable energy and energy efficiency, including projects in Tasmania. Tasmania produces more renewable energy than any other Australian state. Selling our renewable energy to other states earns about $70 million for Tasmania every year.

This money is used to pay for our hospitals, schools and other important services. Producing renewable energy fits with Tasmania’s clean, green and creative brand which so many businesses rely on.

March 21, 2014 Posted by | Tasmania, wind | Leave a comment

Australian Medical Association says wind farms do no cause adverse health effects

WIND-FARMAMA statement on wind power should reassure Australians says CEC http://www.renewableenergymagazine.com/article/ama-statement-on-wind-power-should-reassure-20140319 Robin WhitlockTuesday, 18 March 2014 The Australian Clean Energy Council (CEC) has welcomed a public statement by the Australian Medical Association dismissing claims of adverse health effects from wind turbinesThe CEC said that the AMA statement should provide additional peace of mind for communities living in the vicinity of existing or proposed wind power projects. CEC Policy Director Russell Marsh added that the AMA statement followed similar recommendations by health and acoustic bodies across Australia, to the effect that there is no evidence to link wind farms and adverse health effects.

“Other groups that have made positive statements on wind farm noise and health recently include the New South Wales and Victorian health departments, the South Australian Environmental Protection Agency and the Association of Australian Acoustical Consultants” said Mr Marsh. “The National Health and Medical Research Council, the national peak body for health research, also released a draft position statement several weeks ago that stated there was ‘no reliable or consistent evidence that proximity to wind farms or wind farm noise is directly associated with health effects’.”

Mr Marsh went on to report that no credible Australian health or acoustic organisations are opposing wind farms and that people should therefore feel reassured by that.

There has been a steady misinformation campaign in Australia over several years waged by those opposed to wind farms. This makes it even more important that developers of wind power projects should maintain good relations with the communities living in the vicinity of existing or proposed wind farms.

The CEC has now developed community engagement guidelines for wind farms in addition to a community expectations guide.

For additional information:  Clean Energy Council (CEC)   Community Engagement Guidelines

March 20, 2014 Posted by | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, wind | Leave a comment

In Canberra 80.000 homes to be powered by wind energy

wind-turb-smWind energy to power 80,000 Canberra homes   Chief Assembly reporter for The Canberra Times, 12 Mar 14,  Wind energy is set to power 80,000 Canberra households within six years as the ACT government announces details on Thursday of an auction for huge wind farms in the region.

The government will sign 20-year deals with successful bidders, who will get a guaranteed price for the energy they supply.

The news will energise wind farms at different stages of approval and construction that have been waiting for a guaranteed buyer for the energy. But it is also set to galvanise anger in country areas that will host forests of wind turbines powering the capital…..http://www.canberratimes.com.au/act-news/wind-energy-to-power-80000-canberra-homes-20140311-34kox.html

March 12, 2014 Posted by | ACT, wind | 1 Comment