Antinuclear

Australian news, and some related international items

Who pays for nuclear power’s “Front End” and “Back end” ?

Who pays for the hidden costs of nuclear power? Why don’t we talk about the short and long-term costs of the “Front End” – the uranium industry, and of the” Back End” – finished nuclear reactors, and nuclear wastes. (Doncha love that euphemism “Decommissioning” of the dead nuclear reactors? )

March 7, 2010 - Posted by | 1, uranium | , , , , ,

1 Comment »

  1. How can Pro Nukes describe something so COSTLY as EN_RICH_MENT, as in “enrichment” of uranium, when the more fitting term is ENTOXIC or ENTOXIFICATION ?
    When the bombs start going off, the World Economy will quickly be brought to its end, there will be no more economic costs and most residents of Nuclear Nations will be wishing their entire life-savings had been spent on No Nuclear… before the inevitable Race War to eliminate any Nuclear threat to Earth.
    Humans pay with every drop of anything when faced with the Precipice of Death.
    Better to WAKE UP Sooner than Too Late.
    NUCLEAR : NEVER SAFE.

    Like

    NoNukes Australia's avatar Comment by NoNukes Australia | March 13, 2010 | Reply


Leave a comment