Who pays for nuclear power’s “Front End” and “Back end” ?
Who pays for the hidden costs of nuclear power? Why don’t we talk about the short and long-term costs of the “Front End” – the uranium industry, and of the” Back End” – finished nuclear reactors, and nuclear wastes. (Doncha love that euphemism “Decommissioning” of the dead nuclear reactors? )
1 Comment »
Leave a comment
1 This month
17 October, Free Public Talk on Nuclear Issues in South Australia
David Noonan will speak on public interest concerns over the new Roxby Downs Indenture Act 2026 on BHP copper-uranium mining and ore processing in SA, and on how AUKUS may face SA with a High-Level nuclear waste agenda.
Dr Jim Green will discuss international developments in the field of nuclear power including ‘small modular reactors’ and Generation 4 ‘advanced’ nuclear reactor concepts.
Help Aunty Sue Protect Her Land and Sacred Sites From Destructive Rocket Testing.
.
Australians deserve the truth
about
AUKUS – https://aukuspublicinquiry.com/
PETITION – To: Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and the Australian Labor Government
of the week – Australians for War Powers Reform (AWPR)
To see nuclear-related stories in greater depth and intensity
How can Pro Nukes describe something so COSTLY as EN_RICH_MENT, as in “enrichment” of uranium, when the more fitting term is ENTOXIC or ENTOXIFICATION ?
When the bombs start going off, the World Economy will quickly be brought to its end, there will be no more economic costs and most residents of Nuclear Nations will be wishing their entire life-savings had been spent on No Nuclear… before the inevitable Race War to eliminate any Nuclear threat to Earth.
Humans pay with every drop of anything when faced with the Precipice of Death.
Better to WAKE UP Sooner than Too Late.
NUCLEAR : NEVER SAFE.
LikeLike