Antinuclear

Australian news, and some related international items

$Billions of Western aid later, Russia’s arctic nuclear dumps still polluted

Although Russian authorities pledged transparency about the region’s nuclear issues, foreign journalists are denied access to a number of sites.

Russian Arctic’s ‘nuclear dump’ gets a faceliftBy Pierre-Henry Deshayes , Google hosted news, (AFP) –18 Oct 10, MURMANSK, Russia — An electronic sign along a busy street posts the outside temperature, the wind strength — and the radioactivity level.Welcome to Russia’s Kola Peninsula, a region that still bears the scars of its dubious past as the Soviet Union’s “nuclear dump”.When the USSR imploded, the northwestern Russian peninsula was left with ageing nuclear submarines and spent nuclear fuel abandoned in not always airtight containers.The Soviet breakdown posed a significant threat to the nearby fish-filled Barents Sea, as well as flourishing opportunities for traffickers of nuclear materials.

Two decades and just as many billion dollars later, the “dump” looks a bit less shabby, thanks to funds supplied mostly by the West.

A common practice until the mid-1980s, dumping radioactive waste into the sea is a thing of the past, and the 100 or so submarines once rusting around the peninsula have now almost all been disposed of.

The coastline’s lighthouses — isolated, unoccupied and therefore vulnerable to theft — have gone from using radioisotope thermoelectric generators, which run on radioactive decay and are widely considered unsafe, to solar power.

“The situation has changed for the better, but from our point of view, there are still problems,” said former submarine officer Aleksander Nikitin.

Nikitin was arrested by the FSB security agency — the KGB’s successor — in 1996 for blowing the whistle on the environmental hazards caused by submarines, making the devastation public through Norwegian environmental group Bellona, for whom he works today.

At the top of his list is a facility at Andreeva Bay, some 40 kilometres (24 miles) from the Norwegian border, which holds 30 tonnes of radioactive waste and spent fuel from nuclear submarines and icebreakers.

Right next to the Baltic Sea, it stocks some 21,000 nuclear fuel rods — small fuel tubes — placed in tanks and dubious containers.

Together the rods account for some 850,000 terabecquerel, which is nine times the amount of radioactivity released by the nuclear accident at Chernobyl in 1986.

“They are the same (nuclear fuel rod-filled) tanks as in the 1980s. They have only built a roof over them to protect them from the rain and a fence to keep undesirable visitors away,” said Igor Koudrik, another Bellona researcher……

Although Russian authorities pledged transparency about the region’s nuclear issues, foreign journalists are denied access to a number of sites.

AFP: Russian Arctic’s ‘nuclear dump’ gets a facelift

October 18, 2010 - Posted by | Uncategorized | , , , ,

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: