Antinuclear

Australian news, and some related international items

A mixed “blessing” for Australia in radiation cleanup breakthrough

It is comforting that Queensland’s Professor Zhu tells us that radiation cleanup will still be needed, even if the world abandons nuclear power.   In that case, it is good that Australia might provide other parts of the world with a technology to help in this.

On the other hand,  Professor Zhu tells us “we have the technology to do the cleaning up for the world.”   This is far from comforting, especially when we realise that the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation is involved.     ANSTO is well known as a promoter of nuclear technology.  There are some in Australia, like John White, Ron Walker and Robert Champion de Crespigny,   and others – who would just love to make several $billion out of importing foreign nuclear wastes into Australia.

This new “radiation absorbent’ might be just the technology they want?   – Christina Macpherson

Breakthrough to help clean up contaminated water, Brisbane Time s, 2 Nov 11 Brisbane scientists have helped developed an intelligent absorbent, which they hope will solve the problem of how to clean up water contaminated with radioactive waste. The research team believes the technology will benefit industries rangingfrom mining to medicine, plus assist in clean-up efforts after nuclear disasters.

One gram of the absorbent can “effectively purify at least one tonne of polluted water”, according to Professor Huai-Yong Zhu from Queensland University of Technology Chemistry. The absorbent, developed in collaboration with the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation and Pennsylvania State University in the United States, effectively locks in the dangerous radioactive material and extracts it from the water.

It uses titanate nanofibre and nanotube technology. Professor Zhu said the technology would run the contaminated water through fine nanotubes and fibres, trapping radioactive ions.

The absorbent could then be safely disposed without the risk of leakage, even if the material became wet. “This saves large amounts of dangerous water needing to be stored somewhere and also prevents the risk of contaminated products leaking into the soil,” Professor Zhu said……Even if we decide that nuclear energy is not the way we want to go, we will still need to clean-up what’s been produced so far and store it safely.

“Australia is one of the largest producers of titania that are the raw materials used for fabricating the absorbents of titanate nanofibres and nanotubes. Now with the knowledge to produce the absorbents, we have the technology to do the cleaning up for the world.”

  http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/queensland/breakthrough-to-help-clean-up-contaminated-water-20111031-1mrom.html#ixzz1cmphoKqI

Christina Macpherson   It all might be rather fanciful anyway.  If you go to “comments” on this item, you will see a comment from a radiation expert, who throws cold water on the whole proposal, anyway, and wonders why, if it’s so great  “why this breakthrough is not on the front page of the IAEA “?

 

 

 

November 4, 2011 - Posted by | Queensland, technology

2 Comments »

  1. Well… Allow me to be a bit skeptical here.
    Will trap both anoins and cations? And what if the water is mostly contaminated by other things like vanadium, chromium, copper – how fast it would get saturated and will need replacing?
    And, I am sorry to say, but the following appears to me as quite fanciful:
    —One gram of the absorbent can “effectively purify at least one tonne of polluted water”—
    So, it does not matter than if, say, processing water at a uranium mine contains 0.001 part per million of uranium or 1000 parts per million – still one gram?
    I am also quite wondering why these breakthrough is not on the front page of the IAEA – helping sort out all the contaminated water at Fukushima. I guess 1 gram will be enough to treat a tonne of water completely saturated with Cs, Sr, I, U, Pu – irrelevant of their chemical composition and concentrations? If that’s the case – we are living in some magical kingdom…
    Well, there may be something to it – but this type of news would fit more into a Harry Potter movie…
    In my personal opinion, naturally…
    cheers, nick

    Like

    Nick Tsurikov's avatar Comment by Nick Tsurikov | November 4, 2011 | Reply

  2. I have looked at some of the papers which Prof Huai-Yong Zhu @ Queensland has published on the subject of titanates, the papers seem to be about Na2Ti3O7 and Na1.5H0.5Ti3O7. He has stated that it is a good absorber for Sr-90 and Ra-226. From what I know of chemistry that it is a reasonable thing.

    In a different paper (I.M. Ali, Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 2010, volume 285, pages 263 to 270) it has been shown that rare earth doped sodium titanates are good absorbers for cesium.

    But the big problem is that cations tend to strongly bind to mineral surfaces such a clay and soil thus the cations tend not to be mobile, the anions such as Cl-36 (chloride), I-129 (iodide) and TcO4- tend to be very mobile. I do not think that a sodium titinate will be a good binding agent for these anions.

    Like

    Mark Foreman's avatar Comment by Mark Foreman | November 5, 2011 | Reply


Leave a comment