Antinuclear

Australian news, and some related international items

How to win the hearts and minds of climate change sceptics


How to convince climate sceptics to be pro-environment, New Scientist,   17 June 2012 by Michael Slezak
, Climate change might eventually cause millions of deaths and all kinds of natural disasters. But don’t tell that to a climate-change sceptic if you want them to do anything about it.

Instead, focus on how mitigation efforts can help people become more warm and caring towards others or how it can promote economic and technological development. That’s the advice psychologists give after confirming the strategy in an experiment.
“I got the idea from mediation. When people have disputes there’s not much point convincing one party that they’re wrong,” says study leader Paul Bain, a psychologist at the University of Queensland in Brisbane, Australia.

Bain and colleagues first took 155 climate-change sceptics and asked them how their country – Australia – would be different in 2050 if action were taken now to mitigate climate change, and how likely they would be to engage in pro-environmental activity.

Earlier research has shown that scientific evidence is unlikely to convince sceptics of the reality of climate change, and that arguments focusing on negative consequences are less successful than positively framed rationales. ……..Journal reference: Nature Climate Change, DOI: 10.1038/nclimate1532

Those sceptics who thought action on climate change would make people more warm and considerate, or would promote technological or political development, were more likely to have pro-environmental intentions, such as voting for green candidates or signing petitions supporting action.

One participant wrote that “if we took action it would show we do care for the environment and therefore care for the human race”.

Bain then went on to test whether telling sceptics about these “co-benefits” of climate change could affect their intentions more than telling them about the harms of inaction.

He found it did. Participants who were told about climate action’s effects on interpersonal warmth or societal development were more likely to report pro-environmental intentions than those told about the health risks of climate inaction. .. http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn21932-how-to-convince-climate-sceptics-to-be-proenvironment.html

June 20, 2012 - Posted by | Uncategorized

1 Comment »

  1. I’m confused about this. Is this correct? Telling skeptics that taking action to fight climate change will make them want to hold hands and sing kumbya. Good grief.

    I have questions about the just how skeptic these climate skeptics actually were in this study.

    Like

    Comment by klem | June 20, 2012 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: