How pro nuclear trolls, (especially pro thorium) operate on the Internet

An article below page describes the campaign by Western intelligence agencies to discredit and disgrace critics.

I don’t for a moment think that I am so significant as to be one of their targets. However, I am a target of the pro nuclear lobby, particularly the proponents of Thorium nuclear reactors – Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactors, (LFTRs) and Small Modular Nuclear Reactors (SMR.s).

I don’t think that these guys can be Australians, because on the whole, Australian don’t go for extreme language and “over the top” accusations. They’re more likely to laugh about this, (as I do)

So I reckon that my attackers are Americans. Here are just a few samples of what these guys say about me on Twitter, (where my name is ChristinaMac1):

Brendan @totterdell91 @ChristinaMac1 is “a despicable manipulative evil grub” #thorium

Brendan @totterdell91 #thorium just how further will your anti nuclear theatre & fetishism corrupt you @ChristinaMac1 ?

Brendan@totterdell91 Personally I believe your anti nuclear phobias have made you into a bitter twisted & seriously evil, duplicitous individual @ChristinaMac1

Brendan @totterdell91 so aside from promoting outright lies & political bastardry @ChristinaMac1 what other lunacy are you selling

John Randall@thjr19 You don’t give a rat’s rear-end about anybody’s future @ChristinaMac1, all you see is your tiny bigoted little world. Put up or shut up.

John Randall @thjr19 @ChristinaMac1 . Are you really so stupid? Go away. Go play in your little sandbox.

John Randall @thjr19 Be warned that @ChristinaMac1 has conceded that she is a paid shill for the FFI. @susila55 Avoid this tainted source of (mis)information.

This would just be funny – except that these same people also put out seemingly scientific and authoritative messages praising new nuclear technology. They do this consistently, raising the question as to whether they in fact work for the nuclear industry, and use this “two pronged” approach to promote it.

February 28, 2014 - Posted by Christina Macpherson | Christina reviews

2 Comments »

Did they say what they will do with the radioactive fission and activation products of their low-tech reactors?

I could not understand the #hashtag mark-up of twitter as I am too old and bald.

Normally they say it is an actinide burner and leaves no fission products . . .Peace on earth / goodwill to all men. Amen. . . etc (congregation sits).

LikeLike

Comment by Teddy Teller | November 14, 2015 | Reply
- Being old and bald is no excuse for ‘not understanding the #hashtag mark-up of Twitter’.
  
  Have the guts to admit that you just want to instead have a life, and not be endlessly trapped by iphone, ipad, laptop, or such devices into spending your beautiful days riveted to screen. Shame upon you!
  
  mmm…mmm there’s a lot of stuff on the Internet – boasting about how thorium nuclear reactors leave radioactive wastes that have to be secured and guarded for ONLY the mere 300 years. Other experts say that in fact they also produce much longer lasting radioactive wastes.
  
  Department of Energy studies showed that pyroprocessing, by generating large quantities of low-level nuclear waste and contaminated uranium, greatly increases the volume of nuclear waste requiring disposal, contradicting “Pandora’s Promise’s” claim it would reduce the amount of waste. http://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/legacy/assets/documents/nwgs/reprocessing-and-nuclear.pdf
  
  LikeLike
  
  Comment by Christina MacPherson | November 14, 2015 | Reply

Antinuclear

Australian news, and some related international items