Australia should stop selling uranium to Russia
Dennis Matthews, 3 March 14, The situation in Ukraine demonstrates the failure of Australian Government policy concerning the sale of uranium to nuclear weapons countries.
The sale of uranium to Russia, China and India was permitted on purely commercial grounds. These three countries are nuclear weapons countries and all are involved in regional conflicts.
All three countries have poor environmental and human rights track records. Russia under Vladimir Putin has become increasingly intolerant and expansionist. It now appears highly likely that Russia’s ambitions will expand from Crimea to Ukraine.
Australia’s uranium has been used to help power Russia’s armament industry including nuclear weapons. At the very least Australia should now come to Ukraine’s aid by putting a stop to the export of uranium to Russia or to any country that is likely to on-sell it to Russia.
Australia’s government sets out to derail Renewable Energy
Australian Government ‘Derailing’ Renewables –http://www.energymatters.com.au/index.php?main_page=news_article&article_id=4200 1 March 14 The Australian Government’s approach towards renewable energy has been a major factor in Australia slipping in Ernst & Young’s (EY) latest renewable energy rankings.
According to the latest Renewable energy country attractiveness index (RECAI), Australia has dropped two places to eighth position. The nation’s highest ranking was no.4.
“Government measures to scrap carbon pricing and clean energy funding are derailing the country’s progress to create an economically viable renewables market,” states the report.
“September’s Liberal/National Party Coalition election victory prompted a dramatic policy U-turn, with proposed legislation to abolish carbon pricing and the US$9b Clean Energy Finance Corporation, and increasing speculation over the scaling back of the national Renewable Energy Target. Australia’s attractiveness therefore remains in limbo.”
However, it also notes elsewhere in the report:
“Troubled markets such as Spain and Australia could see resurgence in project activity as solar and wind applications become economically viable without subsidization.”
Adjustments to the technology weightings that better reflect the increasing impact of solar power have created significant movement in the latest index. The top 10 countries are as follows – figures in brackets show previous rankings:
2. China (2)
3. Germany (3)
4. Japan (5)
5. UK (4)
6. Canada (8)
7. India (9)
8. Australia (6)
9. France (7)
10.South Korea (10)
Looking ahead, EY says with renewable energy now a truly global market; stakeholders must also think globally. It also believes continuous innovation in generation technologies and supporting infrastructure will drive cost efficiencies and provide significant opportunities in all markets.
While financing of renewable energy project is no longer the exclusive realm of banks and utilities and there are significant amounts of capital to be accessed, “creative solutions and new conduits must be identified to open up the finance markets once again.”
Established in 2003, the quarterly RECAI ranks 40 countries on the attractiveness of their renewable energy investment and deployment opportunities.
The latest RECAI can be downloaded here.
False claims against Renewable Energy Target
The energy sector big boys said that the RET must be stopped because, they aren’t making the profits they used to.
Sochi and the renewable energy target, Independent Australia, 2 March 14 If we can spend $307 million on sport and $20 mill to get a few minor medals at the Winter Olympics, we can afford to keep the renewable energy target, writes Lachlan Barker. [Among]the noisome pile of slime that is Abbott Government policy was the cutting, sorry, ‘reviewing’ of the renewable energy targets.
For future reference, note that when an Abbott acolyte – sorry, troglodyte – says they are ‘reviewing’ something, it means that funding is being withdrawn; this is the simplest way to scupper anything that Government disagrees with……….
The Howard Government introduced the mandatory Renewable Energy Targets(RET) in 2001 and this led, as you would expect, to an increase in investment in clean energy sources in Australia.
One example is windfarms in South Australia is, solar, both on roof, and atconcentrated solar thermal (CST) plants, is another.
Despite all the sceptics crying at the time: “Solar only works during the day” and “none of these can provide adequate base-load power”, the various renewables got a little toehold in the market and began making slow inroads.
The problem we have today is that, slow though this progress has been, it has already frightened the major players in the energy sector – Energy Australia (EA) and Origin Energy – so much that they called Canberra and told Treasurer Joe Hockey, Environment Minister Greg Hunt and Energy Minister Ian Macfarlane that they wanted this pinko, hippy, renewable energy thingo stopped in its tracks — pronto!
The three amigos duly obliged and called for a ‘review’, with the clear goal of knocking this clean energy nonsense on the head for good.
Now, when I did my research, I thought I was going to find that the reasons given by the government for stopping the RET and continuing with coal fired power would be the old standard “solar and wind are just not practical”.
But much to my astonishment, I found that it was much simpler than that.
The energy sector big boys said that the RET must be stopped because, they aren’t making the profits they used to.
How’s that?
Apparently, because of the high prices that Origin and EA charge, we homeowners have begun reducing our power usage to save money.
Hence a drop in profit for coal-fired energy companies.
Added to which, with an increasing number of homeowners asking for their power to come from green sources, the energy sector latched onto this as the primary cause of their falling profits.And thus the call to Canberra to have the RET scrapped — an act of ecologic bastardry that will kill off, financially, many of the nascent green power suppliers.
So now we come to my vote for f$%^wit of the year, Burchell Wilson, Chief Economist of the Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry.
He was on the ABC’s 7.30 Reportspouting a load of “renewable energy is costing the homeowner more”bollocks.
I have gone over his gobbledegook in his interview with Sarah Ferguson, and even I, the writer of this article struggle with his lack-of-logic.
So let’s go with a couple of points.
First he says, the RET is costing “$1.6 billion across the economy.”
How’s that, Burchell?
$1.6 billion would buy a lot of solar panels and quite a few wind farms but, unless they’ve been superbly camouflaged with the sort of invisibility technology that Doctor Who would be proud of, I haven’t seen them.
So exactly how the RET is costing us $1.6 bill? I confess myself mystified.
Then he goes on to say:
“Look, the problem with the Renewable Energy Target is it’s a very inefficient way of abating carbon.”
Please forgive me, but:
HOW’S THAT, BURCHELL?!……. http://www.independentaustralia.net/politics/politics-display/sochi-and-the-renewable-energy-target,6217
Need to educate public and politicians on the facts of the Renewable Energy Target
What You Can Do About Australia’s Renewable Energy Target,Energy Collective, February 16, 2014 “…….Step 8 is to repeatedly focus on this one, simple, crucial fact courtesy of the AEMC:
The SRES is virtually the only scheme that supports PV and in 2013/2014 adds around $0.005 to the average cost of electricity (assuming $0.27kWh ave) and is already declining. Therefore, removing or changing the SRES will have absolutely no meaningful impact on the price of electricity but will have an enormous impact on one of the fastest growth industries in the country.
Educate politicians.
Motivate consumers.
Support your advocates.
The RET and SRES Fact Pack:
I have compiled all the great facts that many people and organisations have put together below Continue reading
Aborigines will be disadvantaged if Abbott weakens racial discrimination laws
Tony Abbott faces challenge over dilution of racial discrimination laws SMH,Ross Peake 3 Mach 14 Australia’s Race Discrimination Commissioner will challenge Tony Abbott for the first time on Monday over the Prime Minister’s push to water down racial vilification laws.
Tim Soutphommasane’s intervention in the debate will come in a speech he will deliver at the Australian National University, where he will warn the proposed change may ”licence racial hatred”………..Dr Soutphommasane was appointed by the Labor government in July to oversee the Racial Discrimination Act.
The controversial section is 18C which makes it unlawful to do something reasonably likely ”to offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate” someone on racial grounds.
Conservative commentator Andrew Bolt fell foul of this section in 2011 after accusing several fair-skinned Aborigines of identifying as indigenous to claim benefits only open to Aboriginal people.
In 2012 Mr Abbott said if the Coalition won the election he would repeal section 18C ”in its current form”. Attorney-General George Brandis has pledged to amend this section.http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/tony-abbott-faces-challenge-over-dilution-of-racial-discrimination-laws-20140302-33u29.html
A safer method of screening for breast cancer
This Table Detects Breast Cancer Using Sound Waves, Not X-Rays http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2014/01/this-table-detects-breast-cancer-using-sound-waves-not-x-rays/ 3 March 14
ANDREW LISZEWSKI 20 JANUARY 2014 Traditional mammography machines — besides being uncomfortable — rely on ionizing radiation to image a patient’s breasts. And as all we all know, radiation ironically increases the risk of cancer developing. So a company called Delphinus Medical Technologies has developed a safer alternative called the SoftVue that instead uses ultrasonic sound waves bouncing around inside a large water tank.
The risk of developing cancer from the procedure itself is all but eliminated, and the exam appears to be considerably more comfortable for the patient. Instead of a mechanism that’s designed to compress the breast flat for better imaging, the patient lies face down on a table sitting atop a tank of warm water, and then places their breast into a sealed opening that’s surrounded by a transducer sensor ring.
An ultrasonic signal is then blasted through the tank, and the echoed signals bouncing around and through the breast are captured. Delphinus claims that cancerous tissue has a distinct signature when it interacts with sound waves, which the SoftVue can detect and highlight, making it easier to spot.
The exam itself takes just two minutes per breast to complete, and thanks to a camera inside the tank, it’s easy to precisely position the breast to ensure accurate imaging. In fact, the SoftVue machine apparently doesn’t even required a skilled or experienced technician to operate, it’s designed to be completely user-friendly.
Delphinus originally planned to market the SoftVue as a diagnostic tool that could be used for follow-ups to traditional mammograms. But the system has just been approved by the FDA, which means it can now be offered as a safer and more comfortable alternative to existing methods. [Delphinus Medical Technologies viaMedgadget]
Importance of Renewable Energy Target to Australians
What You Can Do About Australia’s Renewable Energy Target, Energy Collective, February 16, 2014 Anyone who reads the paper knows that the Renewable Energy Target is currently the subject of an inordinate attack. However, when you look at the facts it’s clear that this is completely unwarranted.
The question was put to me “Can you suggest how we in small business can best educate the decision makers about the benefits of the RET? It all seems a bit remote from the man in the street, but the decision will affect us all.”
This statement is right on the money; if you have solar, if work in solar or if you want solar, any change to the RET will affect you. If we add up how many Australians live in homes with solar, work in solar and the general (positive) attitude to solar, it means this decision affects Millions of Australians. I don’t know that our decision makers quite understand this fact. Yet.
Before I get to what to do lets start by understanding what is driving the focus on the RET, by considering it in the broader context of Australia’s most important and current issues………..http://theenergycollective.com/solarbusiness/340196/what-you-can-do-help-save-renewable-energy-target
Traditional Aboriginal methods would control bushfires
How Aborigines could solve Australia’s bushfire problem, BBC News, By Jim Carey 1 March 14, Strong winds and soaring temperatures have led to dozens of bushfires in southern Australia. Could Aboriginal “gardening” techniques be used to control them in future? “…..Having lived and evolved on the continent for millennia, Aborigines managed the land almost like a garden – effectively using expertly controlled fires to keep the flora in check.
The resulting grasslands not only attracted animals which the Aborigines could hunt, they also provided massive firebreaks preventing the kind of destructive fires Australia is increasingly suffering.
When the Europeans arrived they kicked the gardeners out of the garden. And the garden went wild…….
It is too late to reverse the clock back to 1788,” says Prof Gammage. “But the kind of damage we are looking at today could be lessened if we employed Aborigines to do something they spent tens of thousands of years perfecting.”….http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-26174177





