A New Zealander’s view of Australia’s Foreign Minister -Damn it. Not cool.
Julie and the Mushroom ~ Welcome to nuclear wonderland. http://storytellerproductions.net/2014/03/17/julie-and-the-mushroom-welcome-to-nuclear-wonderland/
Oh dear…
New Zealand’s nuclear free stance and continued work towards nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation, regardless of political party, is something to be proud of, if not vaguely surprised by in some cases.
It is disappointing, to say the least, that our special friends in Canberra appear to view this ANZAC relationship differently when it comes to the nuclear industry and the money uranium brings into the Australian economy. Even to the extent it will actively work against the NZ government and it’s partners within international forums.
The SMH reports;
“In October last year, following the election of the Coalition government, Australia refused a New Zealand request to endorse a 125-nation joint statement at the United Nations highlighting the humanitarian consequences of any use of nuclear weapons.”
Not only did the Abbot government play obstruction, it also led the charge through diplomatic channels to frustrate efforts by New Zealand and 15 other nations to stop the use of nuclear weapons under any circumstances on humanitarian grounds . A move which would also place nuclear weapons in the same category as biological and chemical weaponry.
Firstly – WTF? Nuclear weapons bad – peace good. Secondly, the Australian government justifications for the back door shenanigans are just old school cold war ethics – get over it already. Thirdly – WTF? Having nuclear weapons in the same category – the very very bad category – as chemical and biological weaponry is a good thing.
SMH again;
A Foreign Affairs and Trade department submission endorsed by Ms Bishop last October argued that a nuclear weapons ban ”conflicts with Australia’s long-standing position that, as long as a nuclear weapons threat exists, we rely on US nuclear forces to deter nuclear attack on Australia”.
Foreign Affairs and Trade head Peter Varghese bluntly observed that the New Zealand-led humanitarian initiative ”runs against our security interests”.
“Anticipating criticism from civil society for its decision not to join the New Zealand -led initiative, Australiaprepared a joint statement of its own, which sought to balance humanitarian concerns over nuclear weaponswith what it considers the legitimate “security” interest of certain states to possess or otherwise rely on nuclear weapons.Australia’s competing statement garnered the support of just 17 nations, most of which subscribe to military doctrines endorsing the use of nuclear weapons in certain circumstances.”
No comments yet.
Leave a Reply