Terms of reference for South Australia’s Nuclear Royal Commission are inadequate

Given that it will be navigating contested waters with significant and long lasting costs and consequences for this and all future generations of South Australians it is essential that the Premier heeds community concerns and revisits the terms of reference to ensure the Commission does not become a taxpayer funded nuclear industry promotional platform.

South Australia’s uranium legacy, future fails public interest test It’s vital that the South Australian royal commission into uranium mining does not become a taxpayer-funded nuclear industry promotional platform. SBS, By Dave Sweeney
4 MAR 2015 THE CURRENT TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE ROYAL COMMISSION INTO SOUTH AUSTRALIA’S NUCLEAR INDUSTRY SADLY APPEAR TO PUT A HIGHER WEIGHTING ON INDUSTRY PROMOTION THAN PUBLIC INTEREST.

There is to be no review of SA’s atomic test legacy or flawed clean up attempts from earlier uranium mines. Disappointingly, the impacts and experience of current uranium mining is ignored lest it reflect poorly on industry expansion plans and key areas of very real public concern including health impacts, emergency capacity, implications for SA’s precious water resources and the potential for severe reputational and market damage to the important food, wine, fishing and tourism industries are missing.

Given that any credible assessment of the nuclear industry in South Australia also needs to fully explore the unique safety, security, legal, liability and transparency impacts and the full inter-generational economic, environmental and social costs and extent of direct or indirect public subsidies it appears that Premier Weatherill’s Royal Commission has failed to pass the most basic test of independence.

Despite a predictable chorus line of pro-nuclear voices welcoming the announcement of a Royal Commission there have already been a number of reviews at a national level, most notably John Howard’s Uranium Mining, Processing and Nuclear Energy Review in 2007. All of the reviews to date have promised much but delivered little. But opening the door to talk of uranium enrichment, domestic nuclear power and national and international nuclear waste dumping is a major escalation in both rhetoric and risk.

The timing of the Commission move is also in stark contrast to the current run of play in the domestic and international nuclear industry……..

When you add rising compliance and construction costs, unresolved waste management issues and the large numbers of nuclear reactors around the world that are rapidly approaching or passing their use-by date and heading into the costly and complex de-commissioning phase the global nuclear industry is under pressure and under-performing.

Closer to home, the uranium market has been hard hit by the economic fallout from Fukushima. This is apt given that in October 2011 it was formally confirmed that Australian origin uranium was actually fuelling the Fukushima complex at the time of the meltdowns. Australian radioactive rocks are the source of the radioactive fallout in Japan and far beyond. In the shadow of Fukushima, rapidly approaching its fourth anniversary, both the uranium price and production rates have been in freefall and in 2014 Australia exported the least uranium it has for the past 16 years.

The nuclear industry starts with uranium and so should any genuine assessment of the nuclear sector in South Australia, seeking to quarantine this from full consideration is inconsistent with the Premiers call for an ‘informed and mature’ debate and risks moving the Commission away from the real world of industry performance towards providing a publicly funded platform for industry promises……

In many areas, South Australia leads the nation in relation to renewable energy. The state is blessed with high value solar, wind and geothermal resources. It makes scant sense to throw scarce dollars and resources exploring the controversial and contaminating nuclear industry when the renewable sector is the world’s fastest growing energy market and already produces more electricity each day than the world’s risky reactor fleet.

The Trojan Horse in the Commission stable remains the global nuclear industry’s main game and Holy Grail – the search for a place to dump waste. Already nuclear industry advocates are back pedalling on the potential for nuclear power and the viability of uranium enrichment, but are seeing the dollar signs and not the danger signs in a push that ignores South Australians, particularly Indigenous South Australians, sustained and successful efforts to oppose radioactive waste dumping in their country.

March 4, 2015 - Posted by Christina Macpherson | politics, South Australia

2 Comments »

It is important to realise that World Finance is totally for promotion of Uranium mining and Nuclear energy in South Australia and everywhere beyond.

This is probably one of the factors behind the scenes of the SA State Bank disaster a few decades ago :

World Finance wanted to make the People of South Australia feel and think more “beholden” (in debt) to World Finance and the “way” to make up the debt and have the better credit rating was to

INCREASE URANIUM MINING

however

When Diggers Dig Uranium it causes Nuclear Disasters
and Diggers Nuclear Disasters can become a Nuclear War
and a Diggers Nuclear War can become a World Race War
and a Diggers World Race War can become NO MORE WHITE PEOPLE

so NO thanks to Diggers Digging Uranium…

LikeLike

Comment by NoNukes | March 4, 2015 | Reply
The Editor
The Advertiser

Isn’t it fascinating how the nuclear industry and it’s fellow travellers are so sensitive about the industry’s past and present performance and want us to concentrate on some idyllic, non-existent, waste-free, nuclear weapons-free, mirage.

Whatever you do don’t mention Maralinga, or Rum Jungle, or Radium Hill, or radioactive emissions and leaks at Roxby Downs, or underground acidic leach mining of uranium in SA, or Three Mile Island, or the on-going tragedies at Chernobyl and Fukushima, or a host of lesser publicised “incidents”, let’s all forget that nasty, distasteful stuff (ugh!), let’s be positive, let’s waffle on about what might be possible in some far-distant future.

Talk about fairies at the bottom of the garden!

As a history professor is reputed to have told his students “those of you who fail to learn from history will, at the very least, have to repeat this course.”

On this basis alone the nuclear lobby would score a big fat F.

Dennis Matthews

LikeLike

Comment by Dennis Matthews | March 7, 2015 | Reply

Antinuclear

Australian news, and some related international items