Australian news, and some related international items

As compensation payments stop, Fukushima nuclear refugees are forced to return home

text ionisingThe woodlands of Iitate are “acting as a long lasting reservoir for radiocesium and as a large source for future recontamination in the environment beyond the forest,”

flag-japanJapan nuclear refugees face dilemma over returning home, Channel News Asia 
Many residents have been unable to return to their home towns following the Fukushima nuclear disaster. Even what that changes, there will still be lingering concerns about safety. 
21 Jul 2015 NARAHA, Japan: More than four years since Satoru Yamauchi abandoned his noodle restaurant to escape radiation spreading from the tsunami-wrecked Fukushima nuclear plant, the Japanese government is almost ready to declare it safe to go home.

But, like many of the displaced, he’s not sure if he wants to.

“I want my old life back, but I don’t think it’s possible here,” he told AFP on a recent visit to the dusty “soba” buckwheat noodle restaurant in Nahara that he ran for more than two decades………


Activists say despite government assurances, many areas still show highly-elevated levels of contamination, and many are unfit for habitation.

They say that for people who abandoned now-almost-worthless — but still mortgaged — homes, allowing TEPCO to stop payments amounts to forcing them to return.

Environmental campaign group Greenpeace has carried out a study of radiation contamination in Iitate, a heavily-forested 200-square-kilometre (75 square miles) district that sits around 40 kilometres northwest of the crippled plant also being eyed for resettlement.

The town is significant because the government did not order its evacuation until more than a month after the nuclear accident began, but post-facto modelling of the radiation plume showed Iitate was right in its path.

Greenpeace’s new study, published Tuesday, says only a quarter of Iitate has been decontaminated — predominatly roads, homes and a short buffer strip of woodland around inhabited areas.

“Levels of radiation in both decontaminated and non-decontaminated areas… make a return of the former inhabitants of Iitate not possible from a public health… perspective,” the report says.

A person living in the area could expect to absorb 20 times the internationally accepted level for public exposure, Greenpeace says.

“The levels of radiation in the forests, which pre-accident were an integral part of (life), are equivalent to radiaton levels within the Chernobyl 30-kilometre exclusion zone”, the report says, referring to the former USSR plant that saw one of the world’s worst-ever nuclear accidents. “Over 118,000 people were permanently evacuated from the 30km zone around Chernobyl in April 1986, with no prospect or plans for them ever returning.”


The woodlands of Iitate are “acting as a long lasting reservoir for radiocesium and as a large source for future recontamination in the environment beyond the forest,” it says.

That makes the very notion of “decontamination” problematic, says Jan Vande Putte, a nuclear campaigner with Greenpeace, who was in Iitate last week

“There is a risk that the migration of radiation will recontaminate decontaminated areas,” he told AFP…….

for some of those faced with the choice of returning, concerns are still high.

“You cannot work on a farm, you cannot grow rice, and you cannot pick wild plants either,” said Yamauchi, whose speciality used to be tempura made with seasonal wild vegetables.

“(The restaurant) is my everything… it was my life,” he said, his voice cracking.

“There is nothing good about going back.”


July 22, 2015 - Posted by | Uncategorized

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: