Antinuclear

Australian news, and some related international items

Australian company Incitec Pivot invested in US anti-Paris lobbying

Australians invested in US anti-Paris lobbying, REneweconomy, By Dan Gocher on 15 June 2017, In response to President Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, thousands of American organisations, including corporations, states, municipalities and NGOs publicly declared their support for the accord, by throwing their weight behind the #WeAreStillIn movement.

However, as reported by The Intercept, several corporations – including Dow Chemical and Corning Inc – had previously lobbied the Trump administration to withdraw from the Paris Agreement. Both are members of the Industrial Energy Consumers of America (IECA), an industry body representing large energy users. The IECA had written to the White House on several occasions, arguing that the accord would negatively impact competitiveness and jobs.

More importantly for Australians, ASX-top 50 company Incitec Pivot is also a paid up member of IECA. Incitec Pivot manufactures fertilisers, industrial chemicals and explosives, including those used for blasting in mining; making it a significant energy user both in the United States and Australia. As a major Australian company, most superannuation funds will have their members’ retirement savings invested in the company.

That Incitec Pivot indirectly lobbied for the US to withdraw from the Paris Agreement is surprising, but not entirely out of character. CEO James Fazzino previously described Australia’s energy policy as a ‘train wreck’ and has criticised state bans on unconventional gas.

 Incitec Pivot is also an associate member of the Minerals Council, which in the wake of the Finkel Review, has been decrying the lack of support for “clean coal”. In an editorial on Tuesday CEO Brendan Pearson argued, not for the first time, why so-called “High Efficiency Low Emissions” (HELE) coal generation should qualify as ‘clean energy’. The Minerals Council has been one of the most effective lobbyists on energy policy in recent years, essentially providing the talking points for the members of the Liberal and National Parties.

Yet some of the Minerals Council’s largest member companies, including BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto, have declared their support for the Paris Agreement. When questioned how their support for the Paris Agreement reconciles with the lobbying efforts of the Minerals Council, responses are inevitably some variation of “the Minerals Council represents many members” or “we don’t agree with everything they say”. At what point in time then, do the lobbying efforts of industry bodies actually represent the views of its members?……http://reneweconomy.com.au/australians-invested-us-anti-paris-lobbying-47895/

Advertisements

June 16, 2017 - Posted by | General News

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: