Antinuclear

Australian news, and some related international items

Canadians against costly dumping of radioactive trash from research nuclear reactor (like Australia’s!)

Groups opposed to new nuclear licence march in Ottawa, Opposition groups say private consortium lacks proper oversight for nuclear labs, By Julie Ireton, CBC News  Jan 18, 2018 Ole Hendrickson, a former government research scientist, worries that if Canadian Nuclear Laboratories gets the 10-year licence the private consortium wants to keep running the Chalk River nuclear labs in eastern Ontario, approval of a proposed nuclear waste site won’t be far behind.

Hendrickson will be among the concerned citizens, Indigenous leaders, environmentalists and former nuclear scientists marching through downtown Ottawa on Thursday, as they deliver their objection to the licence proposal to municipal and federal politicians.

Nuclear waste in Chalk River will cost billions to deal with and leave a legacy that will last centuries, notes Hendrickson.

In 2014, the federal government gave Canadian Nuclear Laboratories (CNL) control over nuclear operations at Chalk River. The government continues to own the nuclear assets.

CNL’s licence to run the Chalk River labs expires on March 31 and the consortium has asked the regulator, Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, for a 10-year licence agreement, rather than the usual five-year term…….

CNL also has plans for a permanent nuclear waste disposal site at Chalk River, plans that have been criticized by a concerned citizen’s group as being “cheap, dirty, unsafe and out of alignment with International Atomic Energy Agency guidance.”

The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission will hold public hearings in Pembroke, Ont., from Jan. 23 to 25 to consider CNL’s licence.

Dozens of delegations have registered to comment at the hearings.

Lynn Jones, who worked in public health for years and now represents a coalition of concerned citizens, will be among those speaking out at the Pembroke hearings next week.

“Personally I have a big problem with profit being part of dealing with nuclear waste. I’m not alone in that,” Jones said.

She noted that two-thirds of the 88 interventions take issue with the 10-year licence and what they perceive as “reduced oversight”.

Lack of stability, oversight: scientists

In submissions already published, former Atomic Energy of Canada scientists write that “a decision by the Commission to grant a 10 year licence to CNL would be an unsafe and unsound decision.”

The scientists allege “instability in CNL management, lack of knowledge of key regulations and international obligations, and lack of open and transparent public engagement.”

Canadian firm, SNC Lavalin is one of the members of the CNL consortium.

At least one submission cites the legal issues facing SNC Lavalin as a reason the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission must reject the licensing application…….http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/nuclear-chalk-river-license-renewal-1.4492167

 

Advertisements

January 19, 2018 - Posted by | General News

1 Comment »

  1. Some observations on the concerns of these protestors
    1. The CNSC will separately review the plans for the disposal facility. If that is their concern they should make their representations at that time.
    2. There is nothing per se wrong with profiting from work if that incentive creates a desire to do a good job efficiently. There is plenty of oversight (CNSC to ensure the work is done properly and AECL to ensure it is value for money) to ensure that corners are not cut.
    3. Adverse interventions do typically dominate because people that are against something are more likely to speak out. It proves nothing. A survey of points of view of all people in the region would prove something.
    4. The most likely way to put in place unsafe and unsound conditions and to ensure we don’t get value for money is to unnecessarily interfere with the licence approval for reasons that are not relevant to that application.

    Comment by Neil Alexander | January 28, 2018 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: