USA now producing medical radioisotopes without nuclear reactor (no need to import them from Lucas Heights)
U.S. FDA Approves NorthStar Medical Radioisotopes’ RadioGenixTMSystem (Technetium Tc 99m Generator) for Non-uranium Sourced Molybdenum-99 (Mo-99) Production of Imaging Isotope Technetium-99m (Tc-99m)
– Enables domestic Mo-99 supply produced without uranium for U.S. healthcare –
– First U.S. source of medical radioisotope Mo-99 in more than 25 years –
6 Comments »
Leave a Reply
1.This month
International Uranium Film Festival Berlin 2022 Friday, October 7th 2022 – Zeiss Large Planetarium
8.30 p.m TOTEM & ORE
Australia, 2019, Director & Producer: John Mandelberg, Executive Producer: Bozic Wongar,Actress and speaker: Ursula Yovich, documentary, with German subtitles, 97 min.
German premiereThe film begins in 1945 with the atomic annihilation of Hiroshima and ends with the Fukushima meltdown in 2011. It examines the aftermath of atomic bombs, nuclear weapons tests and the Fukushima reactor accident. Radioactive fallout from the British nuclear tests in the 1950s and 1960s at Emu Field and Maralinga in South Australia not only contaminated large parts of the Australian outback. Radioactive rain also reached cities like Adelaide. Above all, however, the Aborigines have suffered from this to this day.
“Totem & Ore” tells the historical tragedies and fears from the point of view of witnesses of the atomic bombing and atomic bomb tests. Indigenous people, activists, filmmakers, artists, actors, writers, composers, doctors and professors all have their say. Ursula Yovich, a Native American actress, appeals: “There must be no more place in the world for nuclear weapons!”
Totem & Ore received a special recognition from the 2022 International Uranium Film Festival
National anti-AUKUS Coalition website
https://antiaukuscoalition.org/ National day of action planned for September 16
FIFTY SHADES OF TRUTH – the Grayzone
Max Blumenthal & Aaron Mate slam corporate media disinfo at Collision Toronto
Antinuclear 
Technetium 99m becomes technetium 99 which is long-lived and extremely dangerous. Any benefits are outweighed by the dangers to other people and the environment. There are things like digital xrays, CT scans, and ultrasound-doppler ultrasound which don’t use radioisotopes.
LikeLike
Thank you, miningawareness. I confess that I have not studied/followed that rather worrying chain of technetium 99, and I need to do so. For the time being, it is clear that medicine is going to keep on using those radioisotopes – in nuclear medicine procedures that are beyond the scope of Xrays, CT scans, ultrasound etc. My first focus is to get rid of nuclear reactors. In Australia, the nuclear lobby is very successfully touting its one nuclear reactor as “essential for medicine” – i.e – “it’s only purpose is medical”. That myth must be busted.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you and thank you for your kind reply. I understand. And, I agree (not that it matters). Australia certainly needs to protect itself because right now it still has a much lower background radiation than the US or Europe, despite the mining and despite some weapons exposure. Hopefully Australia has better standards than the US on for medical discharges. But, technetium is very bad and needs to be fought, whether reactors or medicine.
https://miningawareness.wordpress.com/2016/12/30/important-to-oppose-production-of-technetium-99m-precursor-mo-99-even-late-technetium-99-stays-radioactive-for-millions-of-years/
https://miningawareness.wordpress.com/2016/12/21/tc-99m-becomes-tc-99-which-stays-in-environment-for-millions-of-years-medical-and-non-medical-production-should-be-banned-comment-deadline-30-december-2016/
LikeLike
It does matter. We all work together – trying to shine a light of truth on the web of pro nuclear lies. I doubt that Australia has better standards on radioactive wastes. The authorities are in denial about this – make contradictory statements to the public.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The US made a “patient release rule” which allows the hospitals to release patients even if it exposes the passers-by to an estimated 5 mSv of radiation (compared to 0.25 to 1 mSv per year for reactors). It saves insurance money and hospital cleanup. It is also dangerous for hotel guests and workers (especially maids) since many patients stay there. The EU has maintained the original “standards”, I think. Australia, I’m not sure: https://miningawareness.wordpress.com/2016/02/17/us-radiation-release-rule-for-i-131-patients-allowing-high-public-exposure-comes-back-on-hospital-er-causing-panic https://miningawareness.wordpress.com/2015/10/25/is-petition-for-increasing-public-exposure-to-radiation-a-usnrc-inside-job-retired-nrc-counsel-carol-marcus-wrote-another-petition-at-the-request-of-nrc-staff Someone tested an old watch which if worn 24 hours would expose the person wearing it to 70 mSv. I think these watches (and medical exposures and weapons and radium craze) made cancer seem “normal” and then the nuclear industry can statistically hide their cancers under these earlier cancers.
LikeLike
On the 70 mSv radium faced watch I meant per year. Over 10 years this would have given the person around a 7% chance of additional life-shortening cancer according to BEIR (which is a very low and conservative estimate). I think a CT scan is around 25 mSv.
LikeLike