So far, 4 pro nuclear Submissions to Senate Committee on nuclear waste dump selection.
M
y advice to those writing submissions is to take your time, and do it properly.
I have skimmed through the 4 submissions already published, and they are pretty crummy, repetitive pro nuclear stuff – all emphasising that the writer thinks that the Federal Nuclear Waste Dump is really a matter for the local, not the wider, community
The writers are: Denise Carpenter, Ian Carpenter, Chelsea Haywood and Janice Alex McInnis
No comments yet.
1.This month
For international news go to https://nuclear-news.net/
The Senate Inquiry on Selection process for a national radioactive waste management facility in South Australia. has now published 48 submissions. I am going through them, not at this point able to estimate how many pro-nuke how many anti-nuke.
John Pilger World War III Is Already Under Way
**********************************************************
See our page: Submissions on Radioactive Waste Code 2018/ Submissions published by ARPANSA are overwhelmingly critical, and in opposition to the Federal nuclear dump plan for rural South Australia. [not to be confused with the current SENATE INQUIRY Selection process for a national radioactive waste management facility in South Australia.]
************************************************************************
PETITIONS
– End Julian Assange’s isolation
Don’t Let Frydenberg approve Yeelirrie uranium mine or extinction!
No Nuclear Bundabunda at Brewarrina – bad poison [SIGN THE PETITION]
Defend Country – No Extinguishment of W&J Native Title https://www.facebook.com/events/1593390687411565/ Parliament Qld
Westinghouse, Quit India! [Sign Statement Against Kovvada Nuclear Project]
Leave a Reply