AEMO sees South Australia at 73% renewables by 2020/21 — RenewEconomy
AEMO scenarios predict 73% renewables for South Australia by 2020/21, and up to 80% five years later. And is it worried?
via AEMO sees South Australia at 73% renewables by 2020/21 — RenewEconomy
Related
March 2, 2018 - Posted by Christina Macpherson | Uncategorized
1 Comment »
Leave a comment Cancel reply
1 This month
15 April – Zoom –Nuclear Power is Not the Solution
Apr 15, 2026 01:00 AM in Canberra, Melbourne, Sydney

Join the International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War (IPPNW) on Tuesday, April 14th for a timely webinar exploring the risks associated with nuclear power and challenging the myth that it offers a simple, safe, carbon-free solution to the climate crisis

of the week – Australians for War Powers Reform (AWPR)
To see nuclear-related stories in greater depth and intensity
– go to https://nuclearinformation.wordpress.com/
Pages
- 1 This month
- Disclaimer
- Kimba waste dump Submissions
- – Alternative media
- – marketing nuclear power
- business and costs
- – Spinbuster 2011
- Nuclear and Uranium Spinbuster – theme for June 2013
- economics
- health
- radiation – ionising
- safety
- Aborigines
- Audiovisual
- Autralia’s Anti Nuclear Movement – Successes
- climate change – global warming
- energy
- environment
- Fukushima Facts
- future Australia
- HEALTH and ENVIRONMENT – post Fukushma
- media Australia
- Peace movement
- politics
- religion – Australia
- religion and ethics
- Religion and Ethics
- secrets and lies
- Spinbuster
- spinbuster
- wastes
- ethics and nuclear power – Australia
- nuclear medicine
- politics – election 2010
- secrecy – Australia
- SUBMISSIONS to 2019 INQUIRIES
- weapons and war
- Follow Antinuclear on WordPress.com
- Follow Antinuclear on WordPress.com
Blogroll
Categories
- 1
- ACTION
- Audiovisual
- AUSTRALIA – NATIONAL
- Christina reviews
- Christina themes
- Fukushima
- Fukushima 2022
- General News
- Japan
- Olympic Dam
- Opposition to nuclear
- reference
- religion and ethics
- Resources
- TOPICS
- aboriginal issues
- art and culture
- business
- civil liberties
- climate change – global warming
- culture
- energy
- environment
- health
- history
- legal
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- people
- personal stories
- politics
- politics international
- religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets and lies
- spinbuster
- technology
- uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- water
- Weekly Newsletter
- Wikileaks
- women

This graph and accompanying description is potentially confusing.
Firstly, it is about electricity, a specific form of energy.
Secondly, the heading should refer to energy source not fuel source. Solar, and wind are not fuels they are more correctly described as renewable energy sources. Fuels get burnt and/or consumed in the process, usually producing dangerous, polluting waste products, the vast majority of fuels are non-renewable energy sources (firewood is potentially renewable but not in the same sense as wind and solar).
Thirdly, showing demand on a graph of electricity (MWh) supply is not useful. Showing power (MW) demand makes sense on a graph of power supply because you can have electricity generators generating power but not supplying electricity until they are connected to the grid or other demand. Power supply and demand curves are often quite different.
LikeLike