To 4 March Nuclear News
The corporate-political-media machine now gears up the spin for the 2020 Tokyo Olympics. This is no coincidence, as March will mark the seventh anniversary of the Fukushima nuclear catastrophe. After the 1945 nuclear bombing of Hiroshima and Nagsaki, the American government swamped Japan with propaganda for setting up nuclear reactors – and indeed, the world, for”Atoms for Peace”. So again, the deception now is that the Fukushima tragedy is over – solved – fixed.
The Winter Olympics are over. We now return to your regularly scheduled nuclear crisis.
CLIMATE: Record warming in the Arctic. Some of the world’s biggest lakes Are drying.
AUSTRALIA
Visit of New Zealand PM Jacinda Ardern. 60 minutes duly focused their interview on her pregnancy, not her policies. Of course Australian PM did not agree with her on New Zealand’s policies – of signing the nuclear weapons ban, and helping climate refugees.
NUCLEAR WASTE DUMPING.
Greenpeace finds nuclear waste headed to Australia classified as high-level waste by France. Vitrified nuclear waste due to be sent from UK to Lucas Heights, Australia by 2022.
The Australian government, indeed the major parties, are complicit in the pretense that the “temporary”nuclear waste dump planned for rural South Australia is of concern only to the immediate local community, where some white Australian has volunteered his land, in the expectation of making big bucks. However, at long last, at least there will be a Senate Committee Inquiry about this.
A draft Radioactive Waste Code drawn up by The Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA) widens the waste types permitted, and prepares the way for nuclear waste to be dumped on South Australia. Responses to this have been overwhelmingly negative.
South Australia election – nuclear garbage dump IS an election issue.
South Australia Liberal Party – confused policy on nuclear waste dumping. The lunar right: Senator Cory Bernardi promises $445 billion for South Australia, if it hosts international nuclear waste dump.
New South Wales – Brewarrina nuclear dump protests send clear message to Council: “Keep Bre Nuclear Free”.
Climate Change. Labor wavers back and forth on the Adani coal mine question.
Renewable energy – miles and miles of interesting stuff at reneweconomy.com.au
Call for submissions to the Australian Senate Inquiry about the nuclear waste dump plan

- A single individual or property owner should not be allowed to nominate a site for a nuclear waste dump.
- The federal government have not made a clear or compelling case that we need a national nuclear waste dump in SA.
- The consultation process has been deficient and has caused division in our communities.
- The federal government plan lacks social licence or community consent. Traditional Owners have flagged concerns over cultural heritage issues.
- The project has not considered the full range of options to best advance responsible radioactive waste management in Australia. Australia’s worst waste should be dealt with better.
Xenophon’s SA Best – interesting on renewables, (but what about the planned nuclear waste dump?)
my personal prediction is that this will result in around 90 per cent renewables [in South Australia] by 2030. This is a prediction, not a target.
SA can lead the nation not just on energy generation, but all the manufacturing, construction and jobs that could go with this in areas such as PV panels, components, smart energy, CST mirrors, etc.
What’s Best for South Australia’s energy policy http://reneweconomy.com.au/whats-best-for-south-australias-energy-policy-28835/, By Graham Davies on 28 February 2018
At a recent energy event in Adelaide where I presented for Nick Xenophon’s SA-BEST, it was encouraging that the Greens, SA-BEST, Labor and Liberal all stated that renewables was the future.
However, the Liberal Party is going to be hamstrung by Turnbull/Abbott and the National Energy Guarantee (a thought bubble to appease the Abbott ilk, masquerading as policy); inaction on climate; and offering a $1 billion loan to Adani. Continue reading
Ben Heard, critic of Japan’s “unnecessary” nuclear clean-up, now off to advise Japan
Steve Dale Nuclear Fuel Cycle Watch South Australia, 3 Mar 18 Oh dear… Ben Heard is off to the “Japan Atomic Industrial Forum” conference in April (according to twitter). It’s a wonder he is even welcome in Japan – the Japanese government is working hard and spending $billions trying to clean up some of the radioactive contamination.
Yet this guy has consistently claimed their actions were not only unnecessary but harmful. https://www.facebook.com/groups/1021186047913052/
Climate change is drying up the world’s lakes
What a great article! and magnificent photos!. And Kenneth Weiss has a degree in folklore! Doesn’t that tell us something?
We are in an age where we are constantly being told that STEM (Science Technology Engineering Maths) are what matters most – indeed, are all that matters. Well- yes, they do matter. But what about the humanities – arts, social studies, history literature, cultures? We need more Kenneth Weiss’s – more students of folklore !
Combating Desertification and Drought, TerraViva United Nations Some of the World’s Biggest Lakes Are Drying Up. Here’s Why. [see this article if only for the superb photos]
The Arctic is heating: we have no time to lose
Actions today will decide Antarctic ice sheet loss and sea level rise Guardian, [Excellent graphs] 1 March 2018 by dana1981 more https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2018/mar/01/decisions-today-will-decide-antarctic-ice-sheet-loss-and-sea-level-rise
A new study looks at how much global sea level will continue to rise even if we manage to meet the Paris climate target of staying below 2°C hotter than pre-industrial temperatures. The issue is that sea levels keep rising for several hundred years after we stabilize temperatures, largely due to the continued melting of ice sheets in Antarctica and Greenland from the heat already in the climate system.
The study considered two scenarios. In the first, human carbon pollution peaks somewhere between 2020 and 2035 and falls quickly thereafter, reaching zero between 2035 and 2055 and staying there. Global temperatures in the first scenario peak at and remain steady below 2°C. In the second scenario, we capture and sequester carbon to reach net negative emissions (more captured than emitted) between 2040 and 2060, resulting in falling global temperatures in the second half of the century.
The authors found that global average sea level will most likely rise by about 1.3 meters by 2300 in the first scenario, and by 1 meter in the second. However, there is large uncertaintydue to how little we understand about the stability of the large ice sheets in Greenland and especially Antarctica. At the high end of possible ice sheet loss, we could see as much as 4.5 meters of sea level rise by 2300 in the first scenario, and close to 3 meters in the second scenario.
The study also shows that it’s critical that our carbon pollution peaks soon. Each 5-year delay – a peak in 2025 instead of 2020, for example – most likely adds 20 cm of sea level rise by 2300, and could potentially add a full meter due to the uncertainty associated with the large ice sheets:
we find that a delay of global peak emissions by 5 years in scenarios compatible with the Paris Agreement results in around 20 cm of additional median sea-level rise in 2300 … we estimate that each 5 years of delay bear the risk of an additional 1 m of sea-level rise by 2300 … Delayed near-term mitigation action in the next decades will leave a substantial legacy for long-term sea-level rise.
And remember, this is all for scenarios in which we meet the Paris climate targets, which we’re currently not on pace to achieve. If we miss the Paris targets, sea levels will rise higher yet.
Another new study, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, found that sea level rise has been accelerating. If the rate of acceleration continues – which the lead author notes is a conservative estimate – we would see an additional 65 cm (close to a meter above pre-industrial sea level) of sea level rise by 2100.
Yet another new study published in The Cryosphere using satellite data found that while the East Antarctic Ice Sheet has remained stable in recent years, ice loss from the West Antarctic Ice Sheet has accelerated. Antarctica is now discharging 1.93 trillion tons of ice each year, up from about 1.89 trillion tons per year in 2008. When accounting for snow accumulation, the continent is losing about 183 billion tons of ice per year – enough to raise sea levels by about 3 to 5 millimeters per decade by itself. The melting of the Greenland Ice Sheet is likewise accelerating and is now responsible for about 25% of annual sea level rise (8.5 millimeters per decade).
Meanwhile, the Arctic has been remarkably warm in February – as much as 35°C hotter than average in some areas. In mid-winter, when sea ice should be growing, in the Bering Sea it’s instead shrinking.
The hot Arctic is important because the temperature difference between the Arctic and lower latitudes is one of the main forces that keeps the jet stream moving steadily west-to-east. With a hot Arctic, the jet stream is weakened, leading to weird weather in the USA and Europe. As a result, the western states have been experiencing relatively quite cold temperatures, while the US east coast has been unseasonably hot.
To sum up, ice sheet melt is accelerating, as in turn is sea level rise. Even if we manage to achieve the Paris target of less than 2°C global warming above pre-industrial temperatures, we’re likely to eventually see more than a meter of sea level rise, and potentially several meters. The longer we take to reach peak carbon pollution in the coming years, the higher the oceans will rise. Disappearing sea ice in the rapidly-warming Arctic also appears to be causing increasingly weird and extreme weather in places like America and Europe.
South Australian nuclear waste dump means end of tourism?
Paul Waldon Fight To Stop Nuclear Waste Dump In Flinders Ranges SANuclear waste in the Flinders is the loaded gun to the head of all tourism. https://www.facebook.com/groups/344452605899556/
Queensland premier backs renewables over Adani
Queensland’s premier has talked up gas and renewable energy when asked about the Adani coal mine, on her first day back from a trade mission to the United States.
Federal Labor Leader Bill Shorten this week cast further doubt on Adani’s ability to raise funding for the project and whether a future Labor government would support the project.
Annastacia Palaszczuk on Friday said she hadn’t spoken to Mr Shorten since returning from the US, but reiterated the $16.5 billion mine had to stand up by itself without taxpayer money.
“There are other resource industries investing in Queensland, the gas industry is investing in Queensland, we have $20 billion worth of renewable energy on our books,” Ms Palaszczuk told reporters in Brisbane
“I hope a lot of resource company’s projects go ahead, but money talks, and the money is talking by investing in renewables.”
Ms Palaszczuk deflected questions about the proposed coal mine in Queensland’s Galilee Basin, instead pointing to interest from US investors in her government’s 50 per cent renewable energy target.
The premier said she had also met with the CEOs of a number of gas companies in the US as part of her government’s push to use gas as a transition fuel between coal and renewables.
Shorten slip-slidin’ on Adani
David Speers, The Opposition Leader has issued a statement that stopped short of promising to review the mine’s approval, but didn’t rule it out either. In other words, Labor’s position is as clear as mud. (subscribers only)
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/opinion/david-speers-cash-just-a-distraction-while-shorten-slipslidin-on-adani/news-story/0a61be3ee5fa0280feb69177b3153ed2
Labor can’t have it both ways on Adani Courier Mail editorial
On the issue of Adani’s proposed $16.5 billion Carmichael mine in Queensland’s Galilee Basin, the Labor Party, at both a federal and state level, reeks right now. They need to stop walking the middle road and come up with clear policy.(subscribers only)
http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/opinion/editorial-labor-cant-keep-on-middle-road-on-adani-mine/news-story/8fde752b52ce78e1158a83f6451fff3c
We’re heading to annihilation, warns SA’s nuclear warrior
Anti-nuclear campaigner Helen Caldicott is about to turn 80, but the SA-trained doctor hasn’t lost her fear for the future of the world — or the fire in her belly…….. (subscribers only)
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/lifestyle/sa-weekend/antinuclear-movement-founder-helen-cadicott-on-nuclear-arms-in-the-era-of-trump-and-putin/news-story/b0a1c3ea794e95e8ce9efbb36aea5879