Antinuclear

Australian news, and some related international items

Australian Senate vote – a resounding NO to a nuclear power development Bill

The PRESIDENT: The question is that the motion be agreed to.

Division Data   DivisionNOES 45 (38 majority) AYES 7 PAIRS 0

Ayes:  F. Anning, C Bernardi, P. Giorgiou, P Hanson, D Hinch, D Leyonhjelm, TR Storer

Senator RUSTON- (who voted NO)  – “ The government currently has no plans to review the ban on nuclear generation. ” 

Senator BERNARDI (South Australia): I move: Continue reading

November 22, 2018 Posted by | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, politics | Leave a comment

28 November: Anti-Nuclear Coalition (ANC) delegation to meet with Department of Industry Innovation and Science

Anti-Nuclear Coalition South Australia, No Nuclear Waste Dump Anywhere in South Australia, 22 Nov 18

Anti-Nuclear Coalition (ANC) delegation to meet with Department of Industry Innovation and Science

Support this meeting and protest the national nuclear waste dump outside DIIS offices, 26 Franklin St, November 28 2018 between 12:45 – 2:00 pm.

Background:
Last September the ANC requested meetings with several politicians, including state members Koutsantonis and Minister for Resources & Energy Pellekaan.

Koutsantonis initially agreed and a meeting was arranged. It was cancelled at the last moment with no explanation. On the other hand, Pellekaan initially declined our request, but after a protest outside Premier Marshall’s office and a second letter, a half-hour meeting was granted. Five members of the ANC met with the Minister at Parliament House on Nov 14. A report of that meeting will be ready soon.

Federal Minister Canavan was also asked to meet with members of the ANC and he agreed, but in Canberra. Eventually he delegated bureaucrats charged with running the NRWMF consultation to meet three members in Adelaide on November 28.

At this meeting, we will raise the following:
1. How closely have the Federal Minister and the DIIS worked with state counterparts to inform them of plans for the national radioactive dump? (SA politicians, media and the public, generally, remain confused and poorly informed, or wilfully ignorant.)

2. Former Minister for Energy Josh Frydenberg has said that a radioactive waste dump is a matter of “national significance”. We agree. A national dump IS NOT ONLY A LOCAL ISSUE! We will request DIIS organise a public meeting in Adelaide to ensure that state politicians, media and the public also have the opportunity to hear about the proposal and to question the agencies responsible.

3. Where is it located, what quantity and what does the Department of Defence radioactive waste consist of?

4. After several decades of debate and aborted plans for dumping radioactive waste, why is there still no full inventory and no acceptance criteria for the current proposal available? Why should any community be asked to consider hosting a dump without this basic information?

5. Re the “temporary storage” of intermediate level waste (ILW) ARPANSA’s licence arrangement with ANSTO for the current temporary storage of ILW at Lucas Heights is ‘until a permanent repository is sited and built’. Under no circumstances should it be moved to yet another “temporary” site – for up to 100 years, according to the regulator, ARPANSA .

6. How long does DIIS consider is the lifetime of the canisters containing the ILW. What facilities would there be at the proposed NRWMF to re-package the waste should it be necessary?

7. How long does DIIS consider it would take to site and build a permanent dump for ILW?

We consider that the proposal to build a NRWMF in South Australia is illegal under the SA Nuclear Waste (Prohibition) Act.

If you believe that this dump is a matter for all South Australians, be at 26 Franklin St Nov. 28th 12:45

November 22, 2018 Posted by | ACTION | Leave a comment

Government organising CLOSED GATHERINGS of nuclear waste dump supporters in South Australia

Katrina Bohr   No Nuclear Waste Dump Anywhere in South Australia, 22 Nov 18 
Most recent update on Committee meetings in the Flinders and Kimba-

Kimba’s meeting on the 28/11, I believe is cancelled.
However, a proposed Committee meeting in Quorn is likely to be between 2 and 4pm on the 27/11.
As I understand this is a closed gathering.
Those of us who wish to attend, believe that the nuclear waste dump process should be completely transparent.
Especially at this stage of proceedings.
I hope to have confirmation of location in Quorn. more https://www.facebook.com/groups/1314655315214929/

November 22, 2018 Posted by | General News | Leave a comment

Victoria election a chance to catch the wave of renewbles — RenewEconomy

This summer, a huge swell of renewable energy investment is rippling across the globe, and Victoria is perfectly positioned to catch the wave. The post Victoria election a chance to catch the wave of renewbles appeared first on RenewEconomy.

via Victoria election a chance to catch the wave of renewbles — RenewEconomy

November 22, 2018 Posted by | Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Renewable energy boom – up to 60,000 new Australian jobs by 2030 — RenewEconomy

New analysis from The Australia Institute shows that 53% renewable energy capacity by 2030 would create between 18,000 and 59,000 direct jobs across the country. The post Renewable energy boom – up to 60,000 new Australian jobs by 2030 appeared first on RenewEconomy.

via Renewable energy boom – up to 60,000 new Australian jobs by 2030 — RenewEconomy

November 22, 2018 Posted by | Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Labor to adopt Malcolm Turnbull’s National Energy Guarantee (NEG), and promote renewable energy – bigtime

Bill Shorten to adopt Malcolm Turnbull’s energy policy, pledges to throw billions at renewables, ABC 21 Nov 18 By political editor Andrew Probyn and political reporter Melissa Clarke Australian households will be offered federal rebates to install solar storage batteries under a federal Labor energy policy that will also direct billions of taxpayer dollars at solar, wind and hydro projects.

Key points:

  • Labor to adopt Malcolm Turnbull’s National Energy Guarantee (NEG)
  • Rebates for households and businesses to install batteries if Labor wins election
  • Pledge of $10 billion for Clean Energy Finance Corporation

With climate and energy expected to be subjects of fierce battle ahead of the election next year, Opposition Leader Bill Shorten will unveil Labor’s long-awaited policy today.

The ABC understands Mr Shorten will formally adopt former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull’s ill-fated National Energy Guarantee (NEG) as Labor policy.

Though Mr Shorten is likely to frame ALP adoption of the NEG as an attempt to find common ground with the Coalition on energy and climate change, it will also serve to give Labor political cover against Coalition attack.

The NEG, which was enthusiastically backed by then-energy minister and current Treasurer Josh Frydenberg, was twice supported by the Liberal party room but was dropped in August after some Coalition conservatives continued agitating against the policy.

“We remain committed to a bipartisan solution, if that is possible,” Shadow Energy Minister Mark Butler told AM.

“But we’re not going to wait for this Government.

“We’re willing to work with them, but we’re not willing to wait for them.”

Mr Shorten will recommit a Labor Government to a 45 per cent emissions reduction target by 2030, based on 2005 levels.

He will promise massive spending on renewable energy projects, with the Clean Energy Finance Corporation (CEFC) to have its funding topped up to $10 billion………..https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-11-21/labor-energy-policy-ahead-of-election/10519018

November 22, 2018 Posted by | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, energy, politics | 1 Comment

The UNSW climate dividend proposal will be launched on Wednesday by the Member for Wentworth Kerryn Phelps.

Fresh thinking: the carbon tax that would leave households better off, The Conversation, Richard Holden, Professor of Economics and PLuS Alliance Fellow, UNSW, Rosalind Dixon, Professor of Law, UNSW, November 21, 2018   Today, as part of the UNSW Grand Challenge on Inequality, we release a study entitled A Climate Dividend for Australians that offers a practical solution to the twin problems of climate change and energy affordability.

It’s a serious, market-based approach to address climate change through a carbon tax, but it would also leave around three-quarters of Australians financially better off.

It is based on a carbon dividend plan formulated by the Washington-based Climate Leadership Council, which includes luminaries such as Larry Summers, George Schultz and James Baker. It is similar to a plan proposed by the US (and Australian) Citizens’ Climate Lobby.

How it would work……..https://theconversation.com/fresh-thinking-the-carbon-tax-that-would-leave-households-better-off-107177

November 22, 2018 Posted by | Uncategorized | 1 Comment

American politicians demand transparency on the radiation risks from old nuclear site and the Californian wildfire

Public Risks from the Woolsey Fire and the Santa Susana Field Laboratory: A Letter to DTSC https://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2018/11/20/18819268.php, by Bradley Allen (bradley [at] bradleyallen.net)  Nov 20th, 2018    

On November 19, representatives Henry Stern and Jesse Gabriel authored a joint letter to Barbara Lee, Director of the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). In their letter, Senator Stern and Assembly member Gabriel call for “full transparency” to “ensure the public is fully aware of any public health risks posed by the Woolsey Fire on Santa Susana Field Laboratory.”

Prior to the first round of data analysis, the California Department of Toxic Substances Control reported that its scientists “do not believe the fire caused any releases of hazardous materials that would pose a risk to people exposed to the smoke.”

“A common denominator in every single nuclear accident – a nuclear plant or on a nuclear submarine – is that before the specialists even know what has happened, they rush to the media saying, ‘There’s no danger to the public.’ They do this before they themselves know what has happened because they are terrified that the public might react violently, either by panic or by revolt.” 

—Jacques-Yves Cousteau

On November 19, representatives Henry Stern and Jesse Gabriel authored a joint letter to Barbara Lee, Director of the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). In their letter, posted to social media, Senator Stern and Assemblymember Gabriel call for “full transparency” to “ensure the public is fully aware of any public health risks posed by the Woolsey Fire on Santa Susana Field Laboratory.”

Henry Stern represents nearly 1 million residents of the 27th Senate District, which includes Agoura Hills, Calabasas, Hidden Hills, Malibu, Moorpark, Simi Valley, Thousand Oaks, Westlake Village, part of Santa Clarita and the following Los Angeles communities: Canoga Park, Chatsworth, Encino, Porter Ranch, Reseda, Lake Balboa, Tarzana, West Hills, Winnetka, and Woodland Hills.

Jesse Gabriel represents Assembly District 45 comprised of the cities of Calabasas and Hidden Hills, a small portion of unincorporated Ventura County and several neighborhoods in the City of Los Angeles: Canoga Park, Chatsworth, Encino, Northridge, Reseda, Tarzana, Warner Center, West Hills, Winnetka, and Woodland Hills.

Senator Stern and Assemblymember Gabriel outline five specific requests regarding transparency from the DTSC, and conclude, “Given the serious and unsettling nature of this situation, we respectfully request that all information and data be disclosed as quickly as possible. Our community—and the broader public—deserve answers.”

Letter from Senator Stern and Assembly member Gabriel to DTSC,  Continue reading

November 22, 2018 Posted by | General News | Leave a comment

Research shows that women are more concerned about climate change, than men are

Gender Differences in Public Understanding of Climate Change, Yale Program on Climate Change Communication By Matthew BallewJennifer MarlonAnthony Leiserowitz and Edward Maibach , 21 Nov 18, While political views play a strong role in Americans’ opinions on climate change, there are many other individual, social, and cultural factors that influence public understanding of the issue. Here we explore how views on climate change differ between men and women. A large body of research shows a small—but consistent—gender gap in environmental views and climate change opinions. On average, women are slightly more likely than men to be concerned about the environment and have stronger pro-climate opinions and beliefs. Scholars have proposed several explanations for this gender gap, including differences in gender socialization and resulting value systems (e.g., altruism, compassion), perceptions of general risk and vulnerability, and feminist beliefs including commitment to egalitarian values of fairness and social justice. Some researchers also note that some of the strongest gender differences are found in concern about specific environmental problems, particularly local problems that pose health risks.In our research, we find that, although a similar proportion of men and women think global warming is happening and is human-caused, women consistently have higher risk perceptions that global warming will harm them personally, and will harm people in the U.S., plants and animals, and future generations of people (Fig. 1 on original). Also compared with men, a greater proportion of women worry about global warming, think that it is currently harming the U.S., and support certain climate change mitigation policies, specifically regulating CO 2 as a pollutant and setting strict CO 2 limits on coal power plants……….

on average, women scored lower than men in scientific knowledge on climate change ……..Women were also more likely than men to express uncertainty about a variety of questions. For instance, respondents were asked how much several factors contribute to global warming (e.g., deforestation, nuclear power plants, burning fossil fuels, the sun, cars and trucks). Across many of these questions, a greater proportion of women said “don’t know” than did men

Closing gender gaps in knowledge and understanding of the problem, therefore, ought to receive more attention in climate education and outreach efforts to further engage and empower women in climate issues. This is especially important because women are more likely than men to be harmed by environmental problems like climate change—both nationally and globally. In a recent BBC News Science & Environment article, U.N. data show that globally women make up 80% of people who are displaced by climate change. Because women in many countries tend to have roles as primary caregivers and food providers—and tend to have less socioeconomic power than men—they are more vulnerable to climate problems including natural hazards like flooding, droughts, and hurricanes. In the U.S., for instance, the Institute for Women’s Policy Research reported that 83% of low-income, single mothers did not return to their homes in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina hit in 2005. In terms of public health, air pollution is considered a leading threat to pregnant women and their babies-to-be.

Women play an essential role in responding to climate change. In fact, out of 100 substantive climate solutions identified through rigorous empirical modeling, improving the education of women and girls represents one of the top solutions (#6) to reducing greenhouse gas emissions that cause global warming—similar in ranking to restoring tropical forests and ranking above increased solar energy generation. Women in leadership positions can also foster climate policy solutions. A study on gender equality and state-level environmentalism found that, across 130 countries, women in government positions were more likely to sign on to international treaties to reduce global warming than men. Promoting the participation of diverse women in leadership positions, as well as climate science, can also inspire young women to participate too.

……… For more information on survey methods, please review the 2010 Americans’ Knowledge of Climate Change report and 2018 Climate Change in the American Mind reporthttp://climatecommunication.yale.edu/publications/gender-differences-in-public-understanding-of-climate-change/

November 22, 2018 Posted by | General News | Leave a comment

USA nationwide alarm at plan to reclassify some High Level Nuclear Waste as a lower level

November 22, 2018 Posted by | General News | Leave a comment

Lack of network planning threatens Australia’s renewable electricity future, expert warns

ABC North Qld , By Tom Major 22 Nov 18 Australia’s boom in renewable energy faces an impasse unless more is done to develop infrastructure to complement wind, solar and pumped hydro storage systems, an expert has warned.

The expanding footprint of renewables represents a radical change from traditional large-scale, centralised generation, necessitating more national planning for sending power where it is needed.

Australian National University’s Energy Change Institute director Kenneth Baldwin said the remote locations of present and future renewable facilities meant Australia’s 20th century power grid required reform.

“This is a seismic shift in the way electricity is generated and distributed,” he said.

“In the future it will look much more like the internet of energy, in the same way that the internet developed into multiple nodes and many different interconnecting pathways.

“All these features of the future energy landscape are located in areas that are not necessarily where the demand is, so you have to arrange the electricity network to access the best resources and the best storage.”

Big potential unrealised

Continue reading

November 22, 2018 Posted by | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, energy | Leave a comment

Renewable energy boom – up to 60,000 new Australian jobs by 2030 — RenewEconomy

New analysis from The Australia Institute shows that 53% renewable energy capacity by 2030 would create between 18,000 and 59,000 direct jobs across the country. The post Renewable energy boom – up to 60,000 new Australian jobs by 2030 appeared first on RenewEconomy.

via Renewable energy boom – up to 60,000 new Australian jobs by 2030 — RenewEconomy

November 22, 2018 Posted by | Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Carnegie’s Northam solar farm begins sending energy to the grid in W.A. — RenewEconomy

Carnegie Clean Energy’s 10MW Northam solar farm begins limited export of power as part of commissioning of plant, with full commercial operations set to begin in coming weeks. The post Carnegie’s Northam solar farm begins sending energy to the grid in W.A. appeared first on RenewEconomy.

via Carnegie’s Northam solar farm begins sending energy to the grid in W.A. — RenewEconomy

November 22, 2018 Posted by | Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Construction set to begin on 5MW Mobilong Solar Farm in S.A. — RenewEconomy

Indonesian energy company with plans to develop more than 500MW of renewables will begin construction on a 5MW solar farm near Murray Bridge. The post Construction set to begin on 5MW Mobilong Solar Farm in S.A. appeared first on RenewEconomy.

via Construction set to begin on 5MW Mobilong Solar Farm in S.A. — RenewEconomy

November 22, 2018 Posted by | Uncategorized | Leave a comment

November 21 Energy News — geoharvey

World: ¶ “Swedish Mining Equipment Manufacturer Will Be 100% Electric in 5 Years” • After its first generation electric mining vehicles logged 60,000 hours, Swedish mining equipment manufacturer Epiroc launched its second generation. It said it will electrify its entire lineup in the next 5 years, including some of the planet’s largest EVs. [CleanTechnica] ¶ […]

via November 21 Energy News — geoharvey

November 22, 2018 Posted by | Uncategorized | Leave a comment