There are still serious obstacles to Adani’s coal mine expansion
Any impact on the underground aquifers that feed into the Great Artesian Basin would not only be devastating for the environment, but also for all the communities that rely on its water resources.
The original groundwater model submitted by Adani was not “suitable to ensure the outcomes sought by the EPBC Act conditions are met”
|
With the LNP returned to power, is there anything left in Adani’s way? The Conversation, Director of the Centre for Energy and Natural Resources Law, Deakin Law School, Deakin University, 22 May 19, After months of “start” and “stop” Adani campaigning, the coalmine is poised to go ahead following the surprise success of the Coalition government at the federal election.So is anything still stopping the coalmine from being built?Australia has a federal system of government, but states own coal. This means the Queensland Labor government is responsible for issuing the Adani mining licence……
what has “delayed” the state government so far is its legal duty to make sure the coalmine has an effective plan to manage matters of environmental significance. Before the election, the federal government already approved two controversial environmental plans – the groundwater management planand the finch management plan. The only thing left now is for the Queensland Labor government to give its nod of approval. Not ‘delay tactics’, but a legal dutyThe federal government does not have jurisdiction over state resources unless the project impacts matters of national environmental significance. And the Adani mine is one such project. The mine would remove the habitat of an endangered species and significantly impact vital underground water resources. This means the project needed to be referred to the federal government. The aim of this referral was to make sure the environmental assessment process would sufficiently prevent or reduce irreparable damage to the environment…….. There are two more approvals leftThere are two outstanding approvals required for the environmental conditions to be satisfied: the black-throated finch environmental management plan and the groundwater environmental management plan. Black-throated finchThe Queensland government rejected the black-throated finch management plan submitted by Adani last month. This was because the plan did not constitute a management plan at all. If the finch’s habitat is destroyed by the coalmine, then it’s necessary to outline how this endangered species will be relocated, and how this relocation will be managed. But the Adani management plan does not do this. Rather than setting up a conservation area for the finch, the Adani plan proposed establishing a cow paddock, which would destroy the grass seeds vital for the survival of the finch. Clearly this plan does not comply with the environmental condition attached to its licence. Groundwater managementThe Queensland Department of Environment and Science is currently reviewing the groundwater management plan and have sought further advice from Geoscience Australia and CSIRO. Adani must address how the mine will impact the threatened Doongmabulla Springs in the Great Artesian Basin. This involves creating a groundwater model capable of estimating how much groundwater levels will decrease when water is used to extract the coal. This is important because the basin is a water supply for cattle stations, irrigation, livestock and domestic usage. It also provides vital water supplies to around 200 towns, which are entitled to draw between 100 and 500 million litres of water each year. Any impact on the underground aquifers that feed into the Great Artesian Basin would not only be devastating for the environment, but also for all the communities that rely on its water resources. The original groundwater model submitted by Adani was not “suitable to ensure the outcomes sought by the EPBC Act conditions are met”. It’s unclear whether Adani’s resubmitted groundwater model still under-predicted the impact because the further submissions made by Adani have not been subjected to extensive review at the federal level. Great care needs to be taken to ensure the expert advice from CSIRO and Geoscience is properly heeded…… This is important because the basin is a water supply for cattle stations, irrigation, livestock and domestic usage. It also provides vital water supplies to around 200 towns, which are entitled to draw between 100 and 500 million litres of water each year. Any impact on the underground aquifers that feed into the Great Artesian Basin would not only be devastating for the environment, but also for all the communities that rely on its water resources. The original groundwater model submitted by Adani was not “suitable to ensure the outcomes sought by the EPBC Act conditions are met”…….. A hasty post-election approval of the outstanding environmental plans for Adani coalmine would not only conflict with our domestic legal framework, but also the broader imperatives of the international community. https://theconversation.com/with-the-lnp-returned-to-power-is-there-anything-left-in-adanis-way-117506 |
|
No comments yet.


Leave a comment