Antinuclear

Australian news, and some related international items

The Australian Labor Party wavers about the Adani coal project, but the anti-coal activists are not giving up.

While the Morrison government, including Resources Minister Matt Canavan, have been quick to seize on pro-Adani sentiment, especially in regional Queensland, after the election trouncing Labor too will likely review its stance on the mine.

Joel Fitzgibbon, Labor’s agriculture spokesman, on Monday warned that the party’s emphasis on climate change over coal jobs cost it heavily, including a 10 per cent swing in his own seat in the Hunter.

But the fight is not likely to go away.

As little as 1 per cent of the Great Barrier Reef will remain if global temperatures rise 2 degrees above pre-industrial levels, and we are halfway there, the UN reported earlier this month in a landmark report on global biodiversity.

And the climate risks aren’t restricted to the reef. The Reserve Bank’s deputy governor, Guy Debelle, has warned that climate change could cause financial shocks if companies didn’t take the risks seriously in their planning. 

By risks, he was meaning everything from reputational damage to the damages from bushfires and cyclones, events worsened by climate change. It’s for reasons such as this that major lenders QBE, Japanese trading companies and China’s State Development and Investment Corporation have all reduced their investment exposure to coal. 

Are anti-mine activists about to give up?

The Stop Adani campaign says it’s not going to give up its national efforts.

“We’re not going to let that basin be mined,” a spokesperson for the movement said.

Stop Adani’s local organisations have increased to 190 across the country and these groups won’t be put off by the election outcome.

“These kinds of moments are when movements grow,” the spokesperson said. “Nothing has changed about the science nor what’s at stake.”

What’s next for the coal mine that helped to return Morrison to power?   https://www.smh.com.au/environment/conservation/what-s-next-for-the-coal-mine-that-helped-to-return-morrison-to-power-20190520-p51p7j.html  

It’s been a byword for division but, post-election, moves are speeding up to approve Adani’s Carmichael coal mine in Queensland. How did we get here and what’s next?  By Peter Hannam  Adani’s proposed mine in Queensland has long been a lightning rod for division over coal-mining and climate change in Australia. It is also being named as a big reason for Labor’s lost seats in Queensland amid the Morrison government’s upset re-election.Now Queensland’s Premier says everyone’s “had a gutful” of the issue – and she wants it sorted out.

“I am expecting a definite timeframe by Friday,” Premier Palaszczuk said on May 22.

So what’s next for this controversial project and what are the implications of it finally going ahead?

First, what exactly is the project?

The Carmichael mine, named after a nearby river, is the most viable of nine coal projects earmarked for the Galilee Basin. The basin is about the size of Victoria and contains one of the world’s largest untapped deposits of thermal coal – the type used to make electricity. The mine, which is proposed by Adani Mining (a subsidiary of India’s Adani Group), is meant to be a keystone project for the Indian company’s so-called “pit-to-plug” strategy of owning coal mines to feed its power plants in India.

Adani also runs ports in India and has other interests, including renewable energy. Its chairman and founder, Gautam Adani, was the 10th richest Indian in 2018, worth $17 billion ($US11.9 billion), Forbes reported.

Queensland is no stranger to coal mining, of course. The Bowen Basin, which runs along eastern Queensland into NSW, contains about two-thirds of the state’s coal reserve, including the higher value (and harder to substitute) coking coal, used in steel making.

Still, the nearby Galilee’s “greenfield” nature is attractive for new entrants. Beyond Adani, other billionaires are in the mix, with Gina Rinehart backing GVK’s proposed mine and would-be senator Clive Palmer seeking to advance his Waratah Coal venture.

Adani also runs ports in India and has other interests, including renewable energy. Its chairman and founder, Gautam Adani, was the 10th richest Indian in 2018, worth $17 billion ($US11.9 billion), Forbes reported.

Queensland is no stranger to coal mining, of course. The Bowen Basin, which runs along eastern Queensland into NSW, contains about two-thirds of the state’s coal reserve, including the higher value (and harder to substitute) coking coal, used in steel making.

Still, the nearby Galilee’s “greenfield” nature is attractive for new entrants. Beyond Adani, other billionaires are in the mix, with Gina Rinehart backing GVK’s proposed mine and would-be senator Clive Palmer seeking to advance his Waratah Coal venture.

Mr Adani plans to ship coal from the Galilee Basin to India, where his companies make up the largest private electricity supplier led by the “ultra mega” Mundra power plant, with more than 4000 MW capacity. Adani is betting on forecasts, such as by BP, that India’s power demand will roughly triple between 2017 and 2040.

The Queensland Resources Council notes International Energy Agency estimates point to India’s coal-fired power plant capacity doubling by 2040.

Mr Adani plans to ship coal from the Galilee Basin to India, where his companies make up the largest private electricity supplier led by the “ultra mega” Mundra power plant, with more than 4000 MW capacity. Adani is betting on forecasts, such as by BP, that India’s power demand will roughly triple between 2017 and 2040.

The Queensland Resources Council notes International Energy Agency estimates point to India’s coal-fired power plant capacity doubling by 2040.

What’s been the hold-up?

Adani paid $500 million plus a future coal royalty stream in 2010 to the now disgraced Linc Energy for its Carmichael coal tenements of some 2.3 billion tonnes of coal. The following year it promised to start coal production from 2014.

Adani failed to find banks willing to support its plan for the $16.5 billion “mega mine” that would have produced as much as 60 million tonnes of coal a year. It also hit a series of regulatory and legal challenges, both at the state and federal level, and the project is now a smaller first-stage version that Adani will fund itself at $2 billion.

The April 9 environmental approval by federal Environment Minister Melissa Price – just days before the election was called – removed one key barrier to the project.

But there are still 15 plans needing federal approvals, eight of which require the nod before the mine’s operations can begin.

Adani’s not done with the courts either. Its lawyers are fending off appeals against the mine by the Wangan and Jagalingou Traditional Owners Council, which will be heard in the Federal Court on May 27 and 28.

And the Environmental Defenders Office in Queensland has hearing dates set for June 27-28 for its challenge – on behalf of the Australian Conservation Foundation – of Minister Price’s handling of the approval process for the North Galilee Water Scheme, which is meant to funnel 12.5 billion litres of water along a 110-kilometre pipeline to the Adani and other mines from the Suttor River.

What’s happening now?

The blowtorch for approval is firmly turned on Annastacia Palaszczuk’s Queensland Labor government.

Queensland has granted Adani most of what it needs to start building the mine, such as approving a water licence that grants the Adani mine unlimited access to groundwater for 60 years.

On May 22, Premier Palaszczuk intervened to ask the Coordinator-General to have Adani chief Lucas Dow meet the following day with the environmental authority to set firm timelines for resolving the remaining issues of groundwater and biodiversity impacts. Those timelines will be released the day after that meeting.

“I think the community is fed up with the [approval] process,” she told a media event at the coal port of Hay Point.

“Everyone’s had a gutful of this, frankly,” adding that the weekend’s election rout in her state for Labor “was definitely a wake-up for everyone”.

By contrast, earlier this week, Leeanne Enoch, Queensland’s environment minister, was holding to a line her government had used for months.

“Environmental approvals are necessary for all major projects. The Department of Environment and Science, as the regulator, are continuing to progress through the necessary processes,” she said. “These decisions are made free of political interference.”

What do groundwater and springs have to do with it?

Two key management plans are yet to get the tick from Queensland’s independent environment authority – and the Queensland Premier has now put them under extra pressure to decide.

One of them relates to the Carmichael mine’s impact on water at the nationally significant Doongmabulla Springs, a wetland desert oasis about 11 kilometres from the mine.

The concern is the mine could contaminate or disrupt the aquifers supplying the springs.

The concern is the mine could contaminate or disrupt the aquifers supplying the springs. The state government notes that CSIRO and Geoscience Australia both raised concerns about the groundwater impacts. (The state government had been asking their federal counterparts for the CSIRO report for a month – only to receive it less than half an hour before Minister Price announced her approval.)

Groundwater is the water that seeps into cracks below the Earth’s surface – and which can become contaminated. In Australia, such supplies account for nearly a third of our total water consumption, according to Geoscience Australia. Competitors for the water to be used by the Adani mine include local towns and the region’s farmers.

Queensland’s environment authority wants Adani to demonstrate the sources of the Doongmabulla Springs, and show how its mine will affect them.

And what about those finches?

The second remaining plan awaiting approval – and which has also been given the hurry up – is the mine’s impact on fauna such as the endangered black-throated finch, a tiny bird that has not been seen in NSW since the ’90s as its habitat has been steadily cleared. Adani’s detailing of the mine’s impact on the finches has so far been deemed inadequate.

And there’s a rail link still being debated too?

The original 388-kilometre tracks planned to connect the mine to Adani’s Abbot Point coal terminal has been ditched by Adani in favour of the cheaper option of a 200-kilometre spur to join Aurizon’s network near Moranbah, in Central Queensland.

It is understood Aurizon has up to 12 months to assess the proposal it received from Adani last November – and is in no hurry.

Aurizon said it had a legal requirement to “consider all access and connection requests” and treat them all confidentially.

It is understood Aurizon has up to 12 months to assess the proposal it received from Adani last November – and is in no hurry.

One concern, from a business perspective, is the possibility Adani will proceed to build its own monopoly railway to the coast once the mine starts, allowing it to raise finance for a larger stage two development – a result that would harm Aurizon’s interests.

What does Adani say?

Adani says its decade-long battle for Carmichael’s approval is unfair, although other controversial projects – such as Santos’ proposed Narrabri coal-seam gas venture in NSW is of a similar vintage without a clear green light. Shenhua’s coal mine for the Liverpool Plains of NSW has also taken a decade of approvals – so far.

Any timeframe longer than the next two weeks is nothing more than another delaying tactic.

After the federal election, Adani Mining CEO Lucas Dow said it was time for the state government – which is up for re-election by October 2020 – to read the room and get out of their way: “Even after the weekend’s election, where Queenslanders had their say, the Premier and Deputy Premier still have a tin ear to their own voters. They refuse to hear the concerns of people wanting them to back the Queensland mining industry, back regional communities, and stop shifting the goal posts.”

Mr Dow said the government had had long enough to settle the approvals, and he would be demanding “a conclusion” within the next fortnight. “Any timeframe longer than the next two weeks is nothing more than another delaying tactic by the Queensland Labor Government designed to delay thousands of jobs for regional Queenslanders.”

And Canberra?

While the Morrison government, including Resources Minister Matt Canavan, have been quick to seize on pro-Adani sentiment, especially in regional Queensland, after the election trouncing Labor too will likely review its stance on the mine.

Joel Fitzgibbon, Labor’s agriculture spokesman, on Monday warned that the party’s emphasis on climate change over coal jobs cost it heavily, including a 10 per cent swing in his own seat in the Hunter.

But the fight is not likely to go away.

As little as 1 per cent of the Great Barrier Reef will remain if global temperatures rise 2 degrees above pre-industrial levels, and we are halfway there, the UN reported earlier this month in a landmark report on global biodiversity.

And the climate risks aren’t restricted to the reef. The Reserve Bank’s deputy governor, Guy Debelle, has warned that climate change could cause financial shocks if companies didn’t take the risks seriously in their planning. 

By risks, he was meaning everything from reputational damage to the damages from bushfires and cyclones, events worsened by climate change. It’s for reasons such as this that major lenders QBE, Japanese trading companies and China’s State Development and Investment Corporation have all reduced their investment exposure to coal.

Are anti-mine activists about to give up?

The Stop Adani campaign says it’s not going to give up its national efforts.

“We’re not going to let that basin be mined,” a spokesperson for the movement said.

Stop Adani’s local organisations have increased to 190 across the country and these groups won’t be put off by the election outcome.

“These kinds of moments are when movements grow,” the spokesperson said. “Nothing has changed about the science nor what’s at stake.”

With Cole Latimer   Let us explain

If you’d like some expert background on an issue or a news event, drop us a line at explainers@smh.com.au or explainers@theage.com.au

 

May 23, 2019 - Posted by | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, climate change - global warming, politics

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: