Solar has smashed the centralised energy model, but can it bridge the social divide? — RenewEconomy
As rooftop solar booms in Australia, a closer look at the distribution of “prosumers” across the network reveals emerging inequalities that must be addressed. The post Solar has smashed the centralised energy model, but can it bridge the social divide? appeared first on RenewEconomy.
via Solar has smashed the centralised energy model, but can it bridge the social divide? — RenewEconomy
February 27, 2020 - Posted by Christina Macpherson | Uncategorized
3 Comments »
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
1.This month.
Zoom webinar – “Nuclear Winter: The Environmental Consequences of a Nuclear Exchange.”
April 7th at 11:30 am PST / 2:30 pm EST
Nuclear Winter: The Environmental Consequences of a Nuclear Exchange”

Join us for an informative webinar with renowned atmospheric scientist, Professor Brian Toon, as he discusses the environmental risks and global impacts of a nuclear war. Despite the potential damage caused by the blast from even small nuclear weapons, many countries continue to invest in and expand nuclear arsenals. Professor Toon will provide a scientific assessment of civilian fatalities, agricultural failures, climate concerns, and complications with food supply that would follow any international nuclear conflict. We need to plan how to prevent nuclear conflict and avoid catastrophe. Politicians and military planners must be made aware of global climate and agricultural complications that would ensue. Don’t miss this opportunity to learn from, and engage in, this vital conversation

The Road to War brings a sharp focus to why it is not in Australia’s best interest to be dragged into a war with China which will almost inevitably go nuclear very quickly. The filmmaker has interviewed some of Australia’s senior foreign policy analysts who have vast experience behind them in analysing what really is going on here as the United States rattles its sabres with China. And sets us up to be its proxy, like the poor Ukranians have been fed into the Meatgrinder. So America can remain the Top Dog. The Road to War reveals how the United States through its spy base at Pine Gap and by stationing six nuclear capable B52 bombers in the Top End (without permission from the traditional owners) is making Australia a prime nuclear target if the current war of words suddenly melts down into full scale war.
The Road to War shows the implicit connection between Carbon emissions (the US military uses a whopping 70% of America’s annual petroleum to move its armies and vast War Machine around the globe to its 800+ military bases..but under a loophole wangled at Kyoto, the US military does not have to report its C02 annual emissions). The Road to War starts screening at selected cities and regional centres in March. See the trailer end for details.
Pages
- 1.This month.
- Disclaimer
- Kimba waste dump Submissions
- – Alternative media
- – marketing nuclear power
- business and costs
- – Spinbuster 2011
- Nuclear and Uranium Spinbuster – theme for June 2013
- economics
- health
- radiation – ionising
- safety
- Aborigines
- Audiovisual
- Autralia’s Anti Nuclear Movement – Successes
- climate change – global warming
- energy
- environment
- Fukushima Facts
- future Australia
- HEALTH and ENVIRONMENT – post Fukushma
- media Australia
- Peace movement
- politics
- religion – Australia
- religion and ethics
- Religion and Ethics
- secrets and lies
- spinbuster
- Spinbuster
- wastes
- ethics and nuclear power – Australia
- nuclear medicine
- politics – election 2010
- secrecy – Australia
- SUBMISSIONS to 2019 INQUIRIES
- weapons and war
- Follow Antinuclear on WordPress.com
- Follow Antinuclear on WordPress.com
Blogroll
Categories
- 1
- ACTION
- Audiovisual
- AUSTRALIA – NATIONAL
- Christina reviews
- Christina themes
- Fukushima
- Fukushima 2022
- General News
- Japan
- Olympic Dam
- Opposition to nuclear
- reference
- religion and ethics
- Resources
- TOPICS
- aboriginal issues
- art and culture
- business
- civil liberties
- climate change – global warming
- culture
- energy
- environment
- health
- history
- legal
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- people
- personal stories
- politics
- politics international
- religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets and lies
- spinbuster
- technology
- uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- water
- Wikileaks
- women
The tenant/landlord rooftop solar electricity problem may be overcome to the satisfaction of all concerned.
The major hurdle is the upfront cost.
The capital costs for electricity from fossil-fueled power stations via the distribution/transmission networks are recovered through quarterly bills over the life of the equipment but anyone who wants rooftop solar electricity has to pay the capital cost up-front.
If the landlord could pay the capital costs over a period of say 10 years then they could recover their costs over the same period from the tenants. The tenants would save enough on their electricity bills to offset the increase in rent. Tenants could come and go with no risk to the landlord.
It’s an old story, lack of a level playing field for the generation and distribution of electricity. Meg Lees’ renewable energy target (RET) solved the problem for home owners but not for tenants.
A level playing field is fundamental to a competitive, efficient market.
LikeLike
The high uptake of rooftop solar in outer suburbs vs inner and middle suburbs may be due to the problem of shade.
In the outer suburbs the vast majority of building rooftops would be unshaded by other buildings.
In the inner suburbs the opposite would be the case and the tall buildings would not have enough rooftop area to generate sufficient rooftop solar electricity. The best solution in this case is to reduce demand by energy efficient building design.
The middle suburbs would have less high-rise buildings than the inner suburbs but owners would be concerned that this could change quickly. Solar access needs to be guaranteed for at least 10 years.
LikeLike
The reference to Gill Adams article on smart meters is 7 years old. It would be useful if someone could give an update.
Here in SA nothing seems to be happening, which is probably just as well because the whole National Electricity Market (NEM) model was developed in SA by the then Liberal Government Treasurer Rob Lucas who is the current Liberal Government Treasurer. When Lucas put together the rules for the NEM the then Olsen Liberal Government had been elected on a promise of not privatizing the State owned electricity trust (ETSA). As soon as they were elected they set about privatizing ETSA.
Thanks to Rob Lucas, Australian NEM electricity generation, distribution and transmission companies, many of whom are foreign owned, get a guaranteed return on investment – the more they spend the higher their profits. If the Federal Government disallows an investment the electricity can challenge them in court knowing that their court costs can be recovered through the consumer who also pays for the Government’s court costs.
The aim of smart meters should be to help consumers manage their demand. The simpler the cost signal the more effective the management.
Anyone who has a wood open fire or slow combustion heater will understand the benefits of knowing how much wood has been consumed, how much they have left, and how much it has cost. Every time they chop some wood, bring it inside, and set the fire they are reminded of how much it is costing.
A domestic smart meter should give an instantaneous reading of how much electricity has been consumed and how much it has cost – keep it simple and avoid bill shock.
The meter should be conveniently located inside the house.
Time of-use tariff should apply immediately.
The smart meter should not be used to advertise, coerce or otherwise annoy the user. It should be wholly and solely for clearly informing the consumer about their consumption and it’s cost.
LikeLike