Refuting Senator Matt Canavan’s inaccurate hype about small nuclear reactors
Canavan Keeping The Nuclear SMR Vaporware Dream Alive , Solar Quotes ,March 12, 2021 by Michael Bloch ”…… Senator Matt Canavan: ”Keep Nuclear Energy On The Table” It’s probably been a disappointing week for pro-coal Senator Matt Canavan with the news Yallourn Power Station will retire in mid-2028 instead of 2032. But as well as a passion for coal, Senator Canavan is a nuclear power supporter.In an interview with Sky News yesterday, Senator Canavan commented:
A year ago he referred to renewables as the “dole bludgers” of energy, using the same logic. With regard to the Fukushima incident, he stated: “The latest nuclear technology is much safer; more self-contained. Small modular reactors are effectively the size of shipping containers that are much more suited to our country and size and don’t have the same safety issues.” He also managed to squeeze in a mention about instances of fatalities associated with installing solar panels on rooftops just for good measure. But back to the small modular reactors (SMRs). Where are these SMRs he speaks of? The World Nuclear Industry Status Report 2020 released in September last year states:
|
|
The Australian government’s Kimba Nuclear Waste Dump Bill moribund in the Senate
Fukushima’s nuclear waste nightmare – a warning to Australia’s pro-nukers
The Advertiser,Robyn Wood, 11 Mar 21, Today is the 10th anniversary of the Fukushima earthquake and nuclear power station reactor meltdown in Japan. Far from being under control, there are still serious problems with the reactor. In addition, there are thousands of large plastic bags of contaminated soil with nowhere to go, and thousands of litres of radioactively contaminated water that the Japanese government intends to release into the Pacific Ocean. Former residents of the area are still suffering with many on welfare, as they have lost their livelihoods and their homes, farms and shops are uninhabitable. Serious food for thought for those advocating for Australia to adopt nuclear power.
Inaccuracy of Robert Parker and his nuclear lobby
Massive $3 billion wind, solar and battery project approved in South Australia — RenewEconomy

Massive Goyder South wind, solar and battery storage project in South Australia gains planning approval, with first stage to begin construction later this year. The post Massive $3 billion wind, solar and battery project approved in South Australia appeared first on RenewEconomy.
Massive $3 billion wind, solar and battery project approved in South Australia — RenewEconomy
Funds have $1 trillion to spend on renewables, but are scared of Australia’s policy chaos — RenewEconomy

Big global pension funds have a huge and growing appetite for renewables, but they need policy stability, and Australia’s policy chaos is scaring them away. The post Funds have $1 trillion to spend on renewables, but are scared of Australia’s policy chaos appeared first on RenewEconomy.
Funds have $1 trillion to spend on renewables, but are scared of Australia’s policy chaos — RenewEconomy
Small modular nuclear reactors and net-zero carbon emissions by 2050? The math doesn’t add up.
Hill Times 10th March 2021, MV Ramana: Small modular nuclear reactors and net-zero carbon emissions by 2050? The math doesn’t add up. In December 2020, Natural Resources Minister Seamus O’Regan released an action plan for small modular nuclear reactors (SMRs), which assured us that SMRs will enable, among other things, “a net-zero economy by 2050.” Earlier, O’Regan also stated: “We have not seen a model where we can get to net-zero emissions by 2050
without nuclear (power).” How does one evaluate such assertions? A nuclear plant takes around a decade to go from start of construction to
producing electricity. But one can’t start construction of a nuclear reactor immediately. The requisite planning and raising the finances might take another decade. How about SMRs? These will take even longer because the SMRs being developed in Ontario and New Brunswick are just conceptual designs. To develop full-fledged constructible designs is time consuming and expensive. NuScale, the leading U.S. design, has been under development for nearly two decades; it is still not licensed for construction because the Nuclear Regulatory Commission has identified various safety concerns.
All this after nearly US$1-billion has been spent on the design. The second parameter influencing climate mitigation potential of a technology is cost. Nuclear power, today, is about the most expensive way of generating
electricity. The only reactors being built anywhere in North America are currently forecast to cost US$29-billion up from a promised US$14-billion. In the United States, home to the most nuclear plants globally, it costs more than US$10,000 per kilowatt of generating capacity to construct a new nuclear plant, roughly eight to 10 times the cost of wind and utility scale solar power plants, respectively. The bottom line is that the math on SMRs just doesn’t add up. Investing in SMRs is a waste of time and money. |