Antinuclear

Australian news, and some related international items

Pat Conroy,Australia’s Minister for Defence Industry in denial about U.S. military bases (?targets) in Australia

Colin Mitchell, 31 July 26

On the 7.30 Report (Wed night) Pat Conroy would only talk about the current 5 year agreement for Rotational Force West due to end in 2032.  Presumably the agreement could be renewed or another agreement made in 2032 for another 5 years or longer.  He would not explicitly say that US subs would not come to HMAS Stirling after 2032 when asked directly by Sarah Ferguson on that.  Instead he simply repeated that the current agreement ends in 2032. 

“There are no foreign military bases in Australia” he said.  What a whopper! (Pine Gap and NWCape are “joint” US – Australian bases).

He insisted that US Subs will not be “based” here, simply rotated through, because they will not be at Stirling for more than a year!

He wouldn’t give any shorter time limit than a year.

As for the Treaty of Rarotonga that Treaty does not prevent nuclear weapons entering Australia as he implied.  It merely says that they can’t be “stationed” here.  What length of time “stationing” would be is not defined in the Treaty.  That leaves a gaping loophole in the Treaty.  The shortest time Pat Conroy would specify for Stirling is one year!  The Treaty of Rarotonga is no barrier to nuclear weapons transiting or “rotating” through Australia, with the length of time constituting  a “transit” or “rotation” not specified.  Pat Conroy’s idea would be anything less than a year.

A sub could go to sea and then come back again for another year!   Likewise a plane could fly out on an exercise and come back again.

Yes the US will respect the Treaty of Rarotonga because the Treaty does not prevent nuclear weapons from being in Australia for extended periods of time.

August 2, 2026 Posted by | weapons and war | Leave a comment

When genocide is silenced in the name of “unity”

30 July 2026 Dr Andrew Klein, https://theaimn.net/when-genocide-is-silenced-in-the-name-of-unity/

When genocide is silenced in the name of “unity”: Labor’s festering wound

Dedicated to the young Senator, the young Muslim – who dared to speak when others stayed silent.

I. Introduction: A Funeral for Unity

In July 2026, over 400 delegates gathered in Adelaide for the Australian Labor Party’s National Conference. They were there to shape the party’s platform – to decide what Labor would stand for over the next three years. Yet, during that conference, a debate about the genocide in Gaza was killed before it could begin.

Labor MP Ed Husic moved an amendment acknowledging the UN inquiry’s finding that Israeli authorities had “deliberately targeted Palestinian children, resulting in genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes in the Gaza Strip.” His motion was initially seconded by the Maritime Union of Australia (MUA).

But on the morning of the debate, the union withdrew its support. Without a seconder, the motion could not proceed. The debate was over before it started. Husic said:

“I’m astonished by the extraordinary amount of energy that’s been put into preventing this being discussed rather than discussing it, rather than having a conversation, rather than thrashing it out better.”

He did not back down. He said: “If they put me in the freezer, I don’t give a shit.” But another voice emerged. Mike Kelly, a former Labor minister and a former Australian Army officer – made extraordinary comments.

II. Kelly’s Accusations: The Weaponisation of Conspiracy Theory

Mike Kelly’s comments were not merely offensive – they were pathological.

Kelly claimed that “hard core, violent revolutionary communists in league with Islamist extremists are subverting the union movement, branches and the Labor Party.” This was not a policy disagreement. This was a conspiracy theory dressed up as political analysis.

One observer described his remarks as “bizarre dangerous claptrap.” They are.

What is the truth?

Kelly is using the spectre of the Cold War to delegitimise anyone who criticises Israel. He is trying to reframe opposition to genocide as a product of extremism. He is trying to silence those who dare to speak.

His own colleague, South Australian Premier Peter Malinauskas, questioned Husic’s motives, suggesting he might be “pursuing a barrow” for attention. This is a classic smear tactic: when you cannot rebut the argument, you attack the character.

III. The Pattern of Suppression

The incident is not isolated. It is a pattern:

  1. A crisis occurs. The evidence of genocide is overwhelming.
  2. The government tries to control the narrative. Dissent is silenced. Critics are marginalised.
  3. The “unity” narrative is weaponised. Anyone who speaks out is framed as a threat to party cohesion.
  4. The dissenters are isolated. Payman is attacked. Husic is put in “the freezer.” The seconder disappears.

At the conference, Husic said Labor had become unwilling to engage in open disagreement. He argued that the “trauma” of the Rudd-Gillard years had created a situation where anything that looked like debate was seen as “disunity” that could bring down the government.

But as one participant noted: “Unity must be based on democratic consent, not bureaucratic diktat.”

IV. The Lancet and the Numbers

The Lancet published a study estimating that the death toll in Gaza could exceed 186,000 people. The study accounted for both direct violence and indirect causes – starvation, disease, the collapse of the healthcare system.

Mike Kelly’s response to these numbers? He did not rebut them. He supported the killers and cheered them on.

That is not leadership. That is moral abdication.

V. The Deputy Prime Minister’s Admission

Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles made a rare admission (paywalled): while Labor’s platform on Israel-Palestine was flawed, compromise was necessary for unity.

In other words: truth matters. Morality matters. Justice matters. But unity matters more.

It is a calculation we have seen elsewhere – the calculation of those who place power over principle, cohesion over conscience.

VI. Conclusion: The Festering Wound

The festering wound inside the Labor Party will not be healed by performances of “unity.” It will not be healed by those sitting in air-conditioned rooms, saying it is “complex,” and hoping the problem goes away.

The young Senator Fatima Payman dared to cross the floor. Ed Husic dared to speak. They were isolated. Attacked. Put in “the freezer.”

But they were not defeated.

They are a reminder that we have real consciences – and not just servile obedience to party loyalty.

August 2, 2026 Posted by | politics | Leave a comment