Antinuclear

Australian news, and some related international items

Small scale solar power racing ahead in Australia

The full report: “Benefits of the Renewable Energy Target to Australia’s Energy Markets and Economy” can be viewed here (PDF).

$21.1 Billion Small Scale Solar Power Investment In Australia By 2020 http://www.energymatters.com.au/index.php?main_page=news_article&article_id=3440by Energy Matters, 26 Oct 12,  An independent report shows Australia’s 20 per cent Renewable Energy Target (RET) has generated $18.5 billion in investment overall so far, with potentially many billions more to be invested – if the policy is left unchanged.

Released by the Clean Energy Council, the report shows Australia’s Renewable Energy Target has resulted in a reduction of fossil-fuel base power generation since it was introduced since 2001 and has also assisted in reining in wholesale electricity prices.

“The report shows that, if left unchanged, the Renewable Energy Target will result in 12 per cent less coal-fired generation and 13 per cent less gas-fired generation between now and 2030, with no reliability or security of supply issues identified,” said CEC Chief Executive David Green. Continue reading

October 25, 2012 Posted by | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, solar | Leave a comment

Australia’s $billions in investment, due to Renewable Energy Target

Clean energy target drives billions in investment SMH, October 25, 2012 Tom Arup AUSTRALIA’s 20 per cent renewable energy target has helped spark $18.5 billion in new clean energy investment since its inception – and will drive another $8.8 billion to 2030 – an economic analysis commissioned by the industry’s peak body has found.

The modelling to be released today by the Clean Energy Council also says Australia would have failed to meet its greenhouse gas targets under the United Nations Kyoto Protocol without the target in place. Continue reading

October 24, 2012 Posted by | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, business, energy | Leave a comment

CSIRO mapping Australia’s wealth of solar energy

Solar mapping to shed light on rich resource , SMH, October 24, 2012 Peter Hannam We may be a nation of sun-worshippers but when it comes to forecasting where the sun shines longest, Australia’s energy authorities are stuck in the dark ages.

The CSIRO is hoping to fill that information void with a lot more riding on it than the best place to get that tan. Energy energy suppliers – current and future – need the data to predict how much solar electricity is likely to flow through the nation’s power grids.

For potential developers of large-scale solar power plants, radiation records are needed to bolster investment certainty as they try to secure finance from bankers or government agencies. The real urgency for hard numbers, though, is coming from the rapid take-up of solar photovoltaic (PV) panels, with the total now approaching 900,000 across the country. Continue reading

October 24, 2012 Posted by | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, solar | Leave a comment

Senators John Madigan and Nick Xenophon move to stop wind farms

 In July 2010, the National Health and Medical Research Council found  that there is no published scientific evidence to support adverse effects of wind turbines on health.

Given their currently significant, and potentially enormous, contribution to reducing Australia’s greenhouse gas emissions, wind farms should not be held guilty until proven otherwise.

Wind farms: guilty until proven otherwise? http://www.climatespectator.com.au/commentary/wind-farms-guilty-until-proven-otherwise, 22 Oct 2012 Albert Yu Recent reports show that coal-fired power stations are finding it difficult to operate in the new market environment with falling electricity demand, a carbon price and the renewable energy target. Meanwhile, as noted by the Productivity Commission last week, wind generation is an “increasingly important source of power” in the National Electricity Market, highlighted by news of the first turbines turning at Australia’s largest wind farm to date, the 420 MW Macarthur wind farm.

As reported on Climate Spectator last month, wind power has allowed South Australia to transform itself from almost entirely being an importer of power from Victoria to being an exporter during high wind periods, whilst significantly reducing the state’s carbon emissions.

On the other hand, sitting before the Senate is the Renewable Energy (Electricity) Amendment (Excessive Noise from Wind Farms ) Bill 2012, introduced on June 28 by Senators John Madigan and Nick Xenophon to (in Senator Madigan’s words) “ensure we do not see any expansion in the number of wind farm refugees.” Continue reading

October 23, 2012 Posted by | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, politics, wind | 6 Comments

Australia’s Small-scale Renewable Energy Scheme (SRES) needs to be kept

Australian Solar Council Goes Into Bat For Home Solar Support  by Energy Matters, 22 Oct 12, “……..The Australian Solar Council has firmly rejected the call by the Productivity Commission to abolish the Small-scale Renewable Energy Scheme (SRES).

“We all know that many more Australians want to install solar panels and solar hot water, but the upfront cost of these systems remains a significant barrier. That is why the SRES is so important and must be continued,” says John Grimes,Australian Solar Council Chief Executive.

“Demand for solar PV has reduced significantly since the solar multiplier was reduced on 1 July, and there are no signs that demand is picking up. The last thing the solar industry needs is more uncertainty.”

The Australian Solar Council is seeking direction and reassurance that the SRES and associated mechanisms are not under threat.

Mr. Grimes says his organisation endorses the view of Giles Parkinson of RenewEconomy who wrote recently that “until organisations such as the Productivity Commission get their mind around solar PV…then we cannot rely on them to make sensible recommendations”.

Under the current timetable, the Solar Credits multiplier is not due to be phased out until July 1 next year. If the Commissions draft recommendations were implemented, that could be brought forward to as early as towards the end of this year. http://www.energymatters.com.au/index.php?main_page=news_article&article_id=3435

October 23, 2012 Posted by | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, solar | Leave a comment

Falling demand for electricity results in halting New South Wales coal fired power station

Fossil Fuel Power – Another One Bites The Dust, by Energy Matters, 21 Oct  AGL Energy Limited (AGL) announced on Friday the suspension of the first stage of its 1,000 MW Dalton power station in New South Wales.  According to a very brief statement from the company, economic viability of the project had been under review for several months due to market conditions…

… The rising demand hasn’t happened – in fact, quite the opposite. According to a report from REC Agents Association (RAA) earlier this year, over the last three years electricity consumption in the eastern states’ National Electricity Market (NEM) had dropped by 3.2 % (6,565 GWh); with over half that reduction attributable to hundreds of thousands of solar hot water and rooftop solar panel installations, along with energy efficiency initiatives.

According to a Sydney Morning Herald article, electricity industry sources estimated more than 10 per cent of electricity demand in NSW was supplied by rooftop solar power systems during much of the daylight hours earlier last week.

The Dalton power station suspension adds to a continually growing scrap heap of gas and coal-fired projects around Australia. Elsewhere in New South Wales, the end of coal fired generation at Munmorah power station has been confirmed. In Queensland, Stanwell Corporation Limited is taking two units at its Tarong facility in Queensland offline soon and last week, it was announced some of Victoria’s Yallourn Power Station’s generation capacity would be mothballedhttp://www.energymatters.com.au/index.php?main_page=news_article&article_id=3432

October 22, 2012 Posted by | energy, New South Wales | Leave a comment

Don’t miss this excellent radio interview on the future of nuclear power

Nuclear Energy Raises More Questions  http://blogs.abc.net.au/nsw/2012/10/nuclear-energy-raises-more-questions.html  ABC Radio 702 Sydney. Tim Holt interviews Derek Abbott,  Professor of Electrical Engineering at the University of Adelaide, raises some very interesting practical considerations that will affect the future of this alternative source.  17/10/2012   

TRANSCRIPT  – (best I could manage – Christina Macpherson)

PROF ABBOTT  – Very hard to say how much nuclear industry is going ahead. Nuclear power –  Some countries going ahead some countries pulling back. Not all so rosy in India.They are planning 60 nuclear stations. But In Tamil district 10,000 villagers demonstrating against local nuclear reactor, going on hunger strikes. Indian forces had to put out 4,000 security forces to control this problem. Needed large security force there.

Can nuclear power supply world’s needs? Could it ever be a reality?
My view is no. Nuclear power at the most could achieve only a very small slice of global energy pie. Can’t even supply half of the world’s needs.
Uranium gradually runs out – ore becomes more crude, harder to find uranium, and mining costs more. That’s one problem
Other problem actual metal you make the nuclear power stations out of / Nuclear power station isn’t just concrete and steel. Metals in nuclear power station – lots of exotic rare metals.Excessive energy given out,  Prone to cracking, these exotic metals needed to prevent cracking are quite rare. Growth rate in consumption of these rare metals is huge , because used also in many modern technologies. Faster growth rate in consumption of these metals than the growth rate in oil. Likely to run out, even without nuclear. When would these metals run out? Add nuclear to the equation put on line hundreds of new nuclear stations.-  eat into these rare metals and depleting them at  a faster rate.
Problem with nuclear power – everything becomes non recyclable. What do you do with the nuclear station – you bury it for 10,000 years. Those metals become radioactive and you can’t re-use them.  So – reducing world’s elemental diversity, supply of these rare metals.How many nuclear reactors would we need to supply all our energy needs from nuclear power?   Something like 15,000 nuclear power stations to power the world presently.  Completely unfeasible to scale up to some sort of nuclear utopia.  We have problems with 430 reactors now.
Get any map of any country of the world – draw 100 dots on map as to where you could possibly put  a new nuclear power station. Hard to put 10 nuclear power stations, let alone 100.  Need to be away from populations, near water, where you won’t get lawsuits. USA would need 4000 nuclear stations – hard put to find 100 spots.

What about Nuclear fusion – the holy grail of nuclear physics?
Yes, we should still research nuclear fusion. But to make that leap to a commercial fusion reactor- a big thing.But nowhere near commercial. Still the problems – high energy neutrons will crack  the metal – same problems of rare metals – metals recycling problems again.
Supply of uranium?   All of the world’s exploitable uranium –  to run conventional nuclear reactors to supply the world’s energy would last less than 5 years. Add up all of world’s exploitable  uranium – maximum amount of energy you could get out – would equal the amount of solar energy you could get in one year. Shows how much bigger solar energy is than nuclear power.There is also a large supply of uranium in oceans ?–  Yes absolutely enormous amounts of uranium in oceans.  but concentration is very small  Enormous volume of the oceans.  uranium in the sea water  3 parts per billion. absolutely tiny.  – extraction very time consuming, very expensive. – so rate of extraction is very low. could not keep up in rate so slow.

What about Fast Breeder New Generation reactors  – a path that we should be exploring? –  still problem of metals cracking and metals becoming non recyclable. New Generation reactors – no commercially proven one running. Is it pie in the sky?
Alternative energy.  In 2010 solar energy power exceeded nuclear.?
Renewables so relatively cheap and easy to lay on. Can build a modular solar farm using curved mirrors that focus sunlight . Mirror 10 metres in diameter – get 300-400 degrees Centigrade  Can super heat water and run a steam turbine.- can set up in desert place relatively easily.
To lay on farms like that in desert in modular form is relatively easy.  Nuclear power station can take 10 years to build. Example new one in Finland  it’s 4 years late- taking long time, expense rising. Solar farm can be built bit by bit, and expand it. The same can be done with wind.
Wind power does need rare metals in its magnets – but you can recycle those materials. Everything you use in solar power is totally recyclable as well
Why did Australia not embrace solar and wind technologies, as California and Spain have?
Sadly Australia has not taken bull by the horns. There are solar thermal projects in Australia. ANU in Canberra have had solar project for  along time.  Australia needs to take up solar. So much desert – the ideal country for solar.
Theoretically, If you powered an area size of Canberra with solar mirrors. – enough to power the whole of Australia.
Sun is  a nuclear fusion reactor – it’s the obvious one to turn to.
Going back to your question about why Australia has not embraced solar power  – Economics  the reason and what we can afford to do. – we have  a relatively small population.  We are getting wakeup calls now  with the changing climate. The rime is ripe now for Australia to change this

October 20, 2012 Posted by | Audiovisual, AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, energy | Leave a comment

South Australia to hold Parliamentary Enquiry into Solar Thermal Energy for Port Augusta

Solar Thermal Energy Parliamentary Enquiry For South Australia http://www.energymatters.com.au/index.php?main_page=news_article&article_id=3430 by Energy Matters The efforts by supporters of the construction of a solar thermal power station in Port Augusta, South Australia have paid off.

SA Mineral Resources and Energy Minister Tom Koutsantonis said a select committee will research a proposal to replace Alinta Energy’s Northern and Playford coal-fired power stations at Port Augusta with a concentrated solar thermal plant. Continue reading

October 19, 2012 Posted by | solar, South Australia | Leave a comment

Solar panels, energy efficiency, high utility prices, are causing slump in demand for coal powered electricity

Power industry in the dark as demand wilts WA Today October 19, 2012 – “…… Demand slump The process itself is clear enough. Higher prices are prompting people to use less power, whether at home or at work. The higher dollar has forced some energy-intensive manufacturers to reduce output or shift abroad.

Solar panels sprouting on roofs at the pace of about 300,000 homes a year and more insulation batts underneath them are also curbing demand, particularly at peak times. Buildings are also much more energy efficient. Continue reading

October 19, 2012 Posted by | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, efficiency | 2 Comments

Queenslanders Urged To Act On Solar Installations http://www.energymatters.com.au/index.php?main_page=news_article&article_id=3429 18 Oct 12  Tens of thousands of Queensland households that registered for the state’s previous solar feed in tariff rate are yet to finalise their paperwork and installations – and may miss out if they wait too long. Continue reading

October 18, 2012 Posted by | Queensland, solar | Leave a comment

Coal power falling – Victoria’s Premier regrets success of renewables and carbon tax

More Coal Power To Go, Electricity Related Carbon Pollution Plunges http://www energymatters.com.au/index.php?main_page=news_article&article_id=3427 18 Oct 12 After years of battling the filthy fossil fuel status quo, Australia’s renewable energy revolutionaries are now really starting to see the changes they dreamed of.

Due to a reduction in electricity demand, the carbon tax and Australia’s Renewable Energy Target putting downward pressure on wholesale electricity prices; coal fired power generation is increasingly falling by the wayside.

We’ve previously reported on South Australia’s Playford B plants being shut down for good and Stanwell taking two units at its Tarong facility in Queensland offline soon. In New South Wales, the end of coal fired generation at Munmorah power station has been confirmed Yesterday it was announced the majority of Victoria’s Yallourn Power Station’s generation capacity would be mothballed – only three of the four units at Yallourn will generate electricity.

Victorian Premier Ted Baillieu had a curious reaction to the announcement according to a report on the ABC:
   “This is an unfortunate signal to the future if the carbon tax is having an impact in this way,” he said.

Clean Energy Council Chief Executive David Green said shifts in the way electricity was generated were to be expected if Australia was serious about shifting to clean energy.
“Six weeks ago renewable energy was wrongly criticised in some quarters for not reducing emissions, and now Australia’s 20 per cent Renewable Energy Target has been criticised for being too effective,” Mr Green said. “The fact is, the Renewable Energy Target is doing exactly what it is supposed to: aiding Australia’s transition to a cleaner energy system and hunting out the least-cost ways of doing this.”

According to an article on WA Today, based on analysis of figures compiled by the Australian Energy Market Operator, electricity sold into the east coast market since the carbon tax was introduced had 7.6 per cent less carbon dioxide associated with it. To paraphrase Gandhi; thanks in part to over 858,000 households installing solar panels, Australians are being the change they want to see in the world.

October 18, 2012 Posted by | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, energy | Leave a comment

How Australians are paying up big time for others’ air conditioning

The percentage of homes with air-conditioners has jumped from around 25 per cent in 1975 to nearly 70 per cent now, with the percentage nearly doubling in the last decade. Those households which do not have air-conditioning are paying an effective a cross subsidy of $330 for the use of those devices during those 40 hours of critical peak periods.

Why you are paying $10/hr to run your neighbour’s air-con  REneweconomy By  on 18 October 2012 We’re not quite into the scorching summer temperatures peaks, but here’s a thought to help boil your blood the next time you lie on the couch, sweltering in the heat. You’re one of  a minority of households that do not have air conditioning, but you might as well, because it’s costing you pretty close to $10 an hour in those summer peaks to subsidise those that do.

That, at least, is the broad conclusion of the Productivity Commission’s report into electricity prices, which shines a light on a well-known fact that has suddenly become political dynamite – nearly all the electricity price rises in recent years is due to the unbelievably inefficient way we use and supply energy.

Here are a few facts that are probably well known but are worth repeating here. Continue reading

October 18, 2012 Posted by | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, energy | 1 Comment

Australia’s first utility scale solar energy plant – but we lag behind USA

Australia lags US by four years in solar roll-out, First Solar says. SMH, October 16, 2012  First Solar, the biggest maker of thin-film panels, said Australia is four years behind the US in building large solar farms and expects its
project with General Electric to help spur the industry’s expansion.

First Solar is supplying panels to the 10-megawatt Greenough River project in Western Australia, the nation’s first large-scale solar plant. The GE- and Verve Energy-owned solar project, which started this month, may increase capacity to as much as 40 megawatts, the companies said Oct. 10.

“This is less about the size and more about the fact that we now have a utility-scale solar project in Australia,” Jack Curtis, First Solar’s Sydney-based vice president of business development, said . “The local industry can now look to this project and see they can be developed, that they can be executed. It will provide local operational data that can be used to bring the rest of the industry along.” ….. http://www.smh.com.au/environment/climate-change/australia-lags-us-by-four-years-in-solar-rollout-first-solar-says-20121016-27pih.html#ixzz29ZyKNn6y

October 16, 2012 Posted by | solar, Western Australia | Leave a comment

In the long run, for Australia, 100% renewable energy will be cheaper than the present energy system

100% renewables in Australia will be cheaper than Business As Usual  REneweconomy, By  on 11 October 2012 Iain MacGill is the first to admit that there’s a good deal more research and modelling work that could be done before Australia might confidently launch itself on the path to 100 per cent renewable electricity generation.

But the main, and very positive, message from the UNSW Associate Professor, and joint director of its Centre for Energy and Environmental Markets (CEEM), is that on the basis of current research and modelling, the viability of a shift to a 100% renewable energy network looks “very promising” – in fact, when you factor in the costs of business-as-usual, it’s likely to be cheaper than continuing on the current path.

Speaking at the All-Energy Australia conference in Melbourne today, MacGill outlined some of the preliminary findings of the current UNSW project on the technical feasibility, underlying economics and possible commercial implications of 100 per cent renewable energy generation for the Australian National Electricity Market.

It’s a hugely complex task, that has had to factor in such technicalities as the NEM’s 0.002 per cent unserved energy standard, moderate energy spill, moderate total biomass, no extra hydro capacity, the need for new NEM regions, and the perennial question of whether a 100 renewables mix using highly variable and somewhat unpredictable solar and wind can reliably meet demand at all times and locations.

And then, of course, there is the all-important question of whether 100% renewables is  economically worth doing, not to mention commercially feasible: can we establish commercial frameworks that drive appropriate deployment at the speed and scale required?

The final estimates for the UNSW work are not ready for release, but when they are they will form a crucial reference point for the clean energy industry. One of the criticisms of the detailed work that the Australian Energy Market Operator is being asked to undertake into 100 per cent renewable scenarios is that it will not reference its cost estimates to business-as-usual, or to the potential savings….. http://reneweconomy.com.au/2012/100-renewables-in-australia-will-be-cheaper-than-bau-51873

October 11, 2012 Posted by | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, energy | Leave a comment

Solar energy farm up and running in Western Australia

Hip hip array! First solar farm opens in WA SMH, October 10, 2012 Australia switched on its first utility-scale solar farm today, a small step on the way to achieving ambitious renewable energy use targets that traditional coal and gas power producers are now fighting to soften.

The Greenough River Solar project, just outside the small town of Walkaway in Western Australia is a joint-venture between WA state-owned Verve Energy and US conglomerate General Electric. It is expected to generate 10 megawatts, enough to power 3000 homes. Continue reading

October 11, 2012 Posted by | solar, Western Australia | Leave a comment