Antinuclear

Australian news, and some related international items

  • Home
  • 1.This month
  • Disclaimer
  • Kimba waste dump Submissions

Labor aims to amend the Nuclear Waste Bill, removing Napandee as the stipulated dump site

Penny Wong office reply to Josephite SA Reconciliation Circle letter before the last Senate session  27 October 2020 
From: “Wong, Penelope (Senator)” <Senator.Wong@aph.gov.au>

Subject: RE: We plead with Labor Senators to vote NO to the undemocratic, unfair National Radioactive Waste Management Amendment Bill 2020
Date: 26 October 2020

Dear Michele,

 RE:      NATIONAL RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY PROPOSAL
 
Thank you for your correspondence on the proposal for a national radioactive waste management facility in South Australia and the National Radioactive Waste Management Amendment (Site Specification, Community Fund and Other Measures) Bill 2020.
 
Senator Wong is aware of different views in the community about this proposed facility.
 
It is clear the Government’s proposal gives rise to issues surrounding Indigenous heritage, environmental concerns, public safety, as well as differing opinions on necessity of such a facility, all of which must be adequately resolved.
 
Australians depend on nuclear technology for medicines used in the diagnosis of heart disease, skeletal injuries, as well as a range of cancers. Radioactive substances and wastes must be handled safely and with care.
 
One effect of the Bill would be to amend the National Radioactive Waste Management Act 2012 to set aside the existing site selection and approval process, and instead specify the site selected and enable the acquisition of additional land for the facility.
 
On 11 June 2020, the Bill passed the House of Representatives. As you noted, Labor opposed the Bill in the House. As you are aware, the Senate Economics Legislation Committee completed an inquiry into the Bill, and now it is up to the Government to decide when this bill will be debated in the Senate. Senator Wong followed the progress of the committee inquiry, in which Labor senators actively participated. We are pleased to see that you quoted from Labor senator Jenny McAllister’s dissenting report in your correspondence.
 
Senator Wong encouraged members of the South Australian community to engage with the Senate Economics Legislation Committee inquiry in order to ensure committee members and parliamentarians more broadly are aware of community attitudes. Along with consultation that has taken place with stakeholders, as well as community views expressed to Labor parliamentarians in community meetings and through organised petitions and campaign emails, this informed Shadow Cabinet and Caucus as they finalised Labor’s position on the legislation.
 
Labor has decided move an amendment to the legislation in the Senate that will remove the section of the Bill that nominates the site at Napandee, near Kimba, as the location of the national radioactive waste management facility, whilst maintaining the Community Fund established in the Bill for whatever community eventually hosts the site. Should our amendment be unsuccessful, we will oppose the Bill in the Senate.
 
Labor’s proposed course of action does not prevent the Government from nominating the site under the existing legal process, something it could do today. However, retaining the existing process ensures this significant decision will be subject to judicial review so that the community can be assured the decision about where to locate the facility was reached as a result of a fair and properly conducted process. This is something we are aware that the representatives of the Barngarla People have expressed is particularly important to them.
 
Ten years ago, Federal Labor deliberately amended the current legislation to include judicial review so that an affected party could challenge a decision made by the relevant minister. This is a contentious issue and should have the highest levels of scrutiny to ensure that the principles of procedural fairness and natural justice have been applied given the national significance of this matter.
 
Thank you again for your correspondence.
 
Yours sincerely,
 
OFFICE OF SENATOR THE HONOURABLE PENNY WONG
LETTER FROM JOSEPHITE SOUTH AUSTRALIA RECONCILIATION CIRCLE
Dear Senator Penny Wong,
 
We plead with Labor Senators, especially with yourself as Opposition Leader in the Senate, to vote NO, as Labor did in the House, to the undemocratic, unfair National Radioactive Waste Management Amendment Bill 2020 coming before the Senate this Tuesday, October 6th.
 
In the years of this federal Coalition campaign there have been many unfair practices and processes in the government’s determination to achieve the SA siting above ground of long lived intermediate level radioactive waste –  toxic for an unimaginable 10,000 years – alongside low level radioactive waste.    
 
It was clear in recent Senate Inquiry that the federal government are taking this site decision to Parliament to deny judicial process to anyone. In particular, the Traditional Owners, the Barngarla people who fought for 21 years to obtain their native title rights have been excluded from having any say over on their traditional lands. The federal government plan is now to ensure they as well as anyone else will excluded from judicial process. Labor Senator Jenny MacAllister’s dissenting report is clear:“In evidence to the committee, the Department confirmed that the effect of the change proposed in the legislation is to remove the requirements for procedural fairness in the selection of the site.”
This dangerous precedent of no judicial review will be set if the Senate passed this Bill. This is not the Australia that we want – and we would expect not what federal Labor wants. 
SA State Labor have spoken up strongly against this legislation. Senator Jenny McAllister’s dissenting report recommends “That the elements of the National Radioactive Waste Management Amendment (Site Specification, Community Fund and Other Measures) Bill 2020 which alter the existing process for site selection not proceed at this time.”
We plead with federal Labor Senators to avoid this extremely concerning circumvention of judicial process by voting against this Bill.
 
Yours sincerely,
Michele Madigan
 Josephite SA Reconciliation Circle

October 27, 2020 Posted by Christina Macpherson | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, Federal nuclear waste dump, politics | Leave a comment

Australia should stop selling uranium to nuclear weapon states and not sell uranium into unstable regions.

David Noonan  Fight to stop a nuclear waste dump in South Australia, 27 Oct 20, 

 

Nuclear Weapons Treaty Ban to come into Force on 22 Jan 2021
https://www.theage.com.au/…/nuclear-weapons-ban-treaty…
Australia should stop selling uranium to nuclear weapon states and not sell uranium into unstable regions.
BHP Olympic Dam will soon bear near sole responsibility for Aust’s uranium sales supply chain issues.
Aust has signed uranium sales deals into India – in a regional nuclear stand off with Pakistan; to Ukraine – in cross border conflict with Russia & separatists & cyber hackers; and to the UAE – into the unstable Middle East.
Dept Foreign Affairs and Trade says this is good business.
Nuclear reactors are targets.
Attacks on oil facilities in Saudi Arabia shows US military gear can not stop attacks on energy facilities in the region.
Aust and BHP Olympic Dam can stop selling uranium.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/344452605899556

—

October 27, 2020 Posted by Christina Macpherson | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, uranium, weapons and war | Leave a comment

South Australian Upper House reaffirms the State’s law opposing nuclear waste dump

Mark Parnell MLC , It was a great day back in 2016 when we won the campaign to stop the ill-conceived proposal to turn South Australia into the World’s dumping ground for deadly high-level radioactive waste.  However, domestic nuclear waste and other radioactive subjects are still on the agenda of State Parliament.

Proposed Kimba Nuclear Waste Dump

Whilst the Federal Liberal Government seeks to push this unnecessary and divisive project through the Senate, the South Australian Upper House has reaffirmed its commitment to State law by opposing a domestic nuclear waste dump at Kimba or anywhere else in South Australia.  Dangerous long-lived radioactive waste currently stored under guard at Lucas Heights should stay there until a permanent solution is found, not shipped 1700kms to another temporary storage site in SA.  If this project proceeds, the Greens will ensure that a South Australian Parliamentary inquiry is held that properly consults all stakeholders, including the Barngarla Traditional Owners who were shamefully excluded from the original community ballot.

Banning Nuclear weapons

State Parliament has recognised the 75th anniversary of the dropping of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.  This horror has inspired 47 countries to ratify a 2017 UN Treaty that would ban nuclear weapons forever.  Only 3 more nations are needed for the Treaty to become International Law. So far, Australia is refusing to sign, for fear for offending our US allies.  You can add your voice here: https://icanw.org.au/

STOP PRESS: We’ve just learnt that the 50th nation has ratified the Treaty, which will now come into effect in 90 days.

Radiation Regulation

The State Government has re-written South Australia’s radiation protection laws.  Whilst most changes were administrative, there are still some fundamental problems, not least of which is that BHP’s Olympic Dam mine at Roxby Downs continues to be exempt from most State laws.  Both Liberal and Labor joined forces to ensure that BHP’s special treatment continues with their “Indenture” overriding laws that all other mining companies must comply with.

On a more positive note, a number of Green amendments to increase accountability and transparency were accepted.  We also secured an amendment that allows South Australia to set its own safety standards for radiation exposure and not be limited to outdated and weak standards applied elsewhere.

 

 

October 27, 2020 Posted by Christina Macpherson | Federal nuclear waste dump, politics, South Australia | Leave a comment

The Greens had a remarkable win in Australian Capital Territory elections

The Green wave that swept the 2020 A.C.T. Election, Independent Australia, By Chris Mordd Richards | 26 October 2020,  In a result almost none saw coming, the A.C.T. Greens have tripled their seat count in the A.C.T. Legislative Assembly following the Election on 17 October.

Going from two seats to six, stealing two seats each from A.C.T. Labor and the Canberra Liberals in the process……..

Clearly any party which manages to increase its representation by 300% in a single election has done an excellent job, appealing to the voters not only as a party but as credible individual candidates as well.

Newly elected MLA Johnathan Davis, who was in a very tight race for Brindabella but emerged the victor at the final count, had this to say on behalf of the Greens:

“The A.C.T. Greens are so grateful for the support we’ve received from Conder to Kippax, from Forde to Fraser. Every single Canberran is now represented by the Greens. We commit to working hard and honouring the support offered to us. Together, we’ll work every single day to build a better normal.”….

While Labor did reasonably well in retaining government, it was instead the Greens’ message which most struck a chord with a particular key segment of voters across the entire Territory this time. …….

The Australian Greens will certainly be examining in detail how the local party pulled it off to see how they might replicate this result in other parts of the country. For now, the A.C.T. is once more the greenest jurisdiction in Australia.  https://independentaustralia.net/politics/politics-display/the-green-wave-that-swept-the-2020-act-election,14448

October 27, 2020 Posted by Christina Macpherson | ACT, politics | Leave a comment

ICRC calls ban treaty entry into force “a victory for humanity” — IPPNW peace and health blog

In a statement following the 50th ratification of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW), Peter Maurer, the president of the International Committee of the Red Cross, said the treaty “allows us to turn our gaze towards the future; to imagine a world freed from these inhumane weapons no longer as a distant […]

ICRC calls ban treaty entry into force “a victory for humanity” — IPPNW peace and health blog

October 27, 2020 Posted by Christina Macpherson | Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Ocean acidification and the uncertain future of marine ecosystems

The uncertain future of the oceans, Science Daily October 26, 2020

Source:
Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (GEOMAR)
Summary:
Marine food webs and biogeochemical cycles react very sensitively to the increase in carbon dioxide (CO2) – but the effects are far more complex than previously thought. Data were combined from five large-scale field experiments, which investigated how the carbon cycle within plankton communities reacts to the increase of CO2.
The ocean plays a key role in the current climate change, as it absorbs a considerable part of the atmospheric carbon dioxide emitted by humankind. On the one hand, this slows down the heating of the climate, and on the other hand, the dissolution of CO2 in seawater leads to acidification of the oceans.
This has far-reaching consequences for many marine organisms and thus also for the oceanic carbon cycle. One of the most important mechanisms in this cycle, is called the biological carbon pump. Part of the biomass that phytoplankton forms in the surface ocean through photosynthesis sinks to the depths in the form of small carbonaceous particles. As a result, the carbon is stored for a long time in the deep sea. The ocean thus acts as a carbon sink in the climate system. How strongly this biological pump acts varies greatly from region to region and depends on the composition of species in the ecosystem.

The study, which has now been published in the journal

Nature Climate Change, is one of the most comprehensive studies so far on the effects of ocean acidification on marine ecosystems. Scientists at the GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research in Kiel have now been able to show for the first time that ocean acidification influences the carbon content of sinking organic material, and thus the biological pump. Surprisingly, the observed changes were highly variable. The carbon content of sinking particles increased or decreased significantly with increasing CO2, depending on the composition of species and the structure of the food web. Since the underlying data cover a wide range of ocean regions, this seems to be a global phenomenon. These findings allow a completely new assessment of the effects of ocean acidification……….https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/10/201026114214.htm

October 27, 2020 Posted by Christina Macpherson | Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Businesses and State governments lead the transition to renewable energy

Guardian 26th Oct 2020, Future historians will no doubt remember 2020 as the year of Covid-19. But according to veteran climate campaigner Bill McKibben, they may also view it as a turning point, the year the world moved decisively towards “the transition everyone knew we needed to make”. McKibben told the recent Global Smart Energy Summit 2020 has been a year of “extraordinary convergence”, from the images of Australia’s bushfires, seen around the world on New Year’s Day – “like something out of Hieronymus Bosch” – to unprecedented developments such as China’s commitment to achieve net zero emissions by 2060, the EU’s pledge to make its Green Deal and Є100bn Just Transition Fund the centrepiece of post-Covid recovery, and the US $15tn divested from fossil fuels.

Closer to home, there’s extraordinary convergence between business and state governments on the need to speed up Australia’s energy transition.

Tim Reed, president of the Business Council of Australia, wants a “national, bipartisan commitment to net zero emissions by 2050”. Most states have already made this commitment, and South Australia is leading the pack. The state’s energy and mining minister, Dan van Holst Pellekaan, says SA will aim for 100% net renewable generation by 2030. Rapidly expanding wind, solar and battery storage capacity in SA’s Upper Spencer Gulf region will play a key role in achieving that aim.

But energy transitions are not just about panels, turbines and targets. They’re processes of social as well as technological change. Unless local people see jobs and other benefits for their communities, there’s a danger support will falter, and the legitimacy of Australia’s energy transition will be undermined.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/oct/26/as-south-australia-now-knows-local-jobs-must-be-a-priority-in-the-clean-energy-transition

October 27, 2020 Posted by Christina Macpherson | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, energy | Leave a comment

South Australia’s global milestone -100 per cent of energy demand met by solar panels alone

ABC 25th Oct 2020, South Australia’s renewable energy boom has achieved a global milestone. The state once known for not having enough power has become the first major
jurisdiction in the world to be powered entirely by solar energy. For just over an hour on Sunday, October 11, 100 per cent of energy demand was met by solar panels alone. “This is truly a phenomenon in the global energy landscape,” Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO) chief executive Audrey Zibelman said.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-10-25/all-sa-power-from-solar-for-first-time/12810366 

October 27, 2020 Posted by Christina Macpherson | solar, South Australia | Leave a comment

The pandemic and the prospect of zero interest present a massive opportunity for clean energy development.

The tantalising promise of ultra-cheap power  South Wind, 27 October 2020 by admin

The pandemic and the prospect of zero interest present a massive opportunity for clean energy development.   The story of 2020 has really been two stories, deeply interwoven, in which what happens in one keeps playing on the other and causing general mayhem. One is about the virus; the other the economy……..

Solar panels are getting steadily more efficient and cheaper to make, but Quiggin sees their greatest potential in the fact that they last three or more decades and cost virtually nothing to operate. The cost of a solar project today arises almost entirely from the need of investors to get a return on the capital they put into the project’s construction and grid connection.

Solar’s low capital cost is stretching the “payback period” of projects – the time available for investors to be repaid in full – so far into the future that the power generated is virtually free. Quiggin calculates that over a module’s lifetime the cost could drop as low as 2c per kilowatt-hour.

Yields from current Australian government bonds are lower than likely inflation. European countries are offering bonds maturing after 50 or 100 years, and the US government is selling similar bonds at negative interest rates.

Given all this, Quiggin believes that governments should issue perpetual bonds yielding inflation-adjusted returns of zero. “In the world of zero real interest rates that now appears to be upon us… governments can, and should, invest in projects whenever the total benefits exceed the costs, regardless of how those benefits are spread over time.”

If there is a powerful case for public investment in renewable energy, the case for doing the same for transmission, says Quiggin, is even stronger. “Electricity transmission lines have the same cost structure as renewables (low operational cost and long lives), if anything more so, meaning that the cost of transmission depends primarily on the need to secure a return to the capital invested.”

This is where Quiggin’s interesting idea really starts to sing. A modern, smart, efficient electricity grid over a wide area like eastern Australia can make intermittent solar and wind power work well for us, rapidly switching demand to where the sun shines and the wind blows and minimising calls on alternative generators or energy stored in batteries or hydro schemes.

Opposition leader Anthony Albanese proposes to spend $20 billion on transmission infrastructure to allow the national grid to fully integrate new renewable sources. The government could go one further by investing in both transmission and renewable generation. But it is still in pre-pandemic mode, offering just low cost finance for private transmission investment.

The pandemic has disrupted everything we knew, killing the old economy and its ideological stereotypes. In these times of upheaval and flux, as John Quiggin says, there are huge opportunities for large-scale public investment in a new, cleaner economy.

Our recovering economy will need a lot of public investment. All we ask of the Morrison government is the vision to see what’s possible and the courage to act. http://southwind.com.au/2020/10/27/the-tantalising-promise-of-ultra-cheap-power/

October 27, 2020 Posted by Christina Macpherson | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, energy | Leave a comment

Community battery storage will help “dumb” networks catch up with energy transition — RenewEconomy

Community battery storage could make Australia’s networks smarter and cheaper, and bring their technology into the same century as the clean energy transition. The post Community battery storage will help “dumb” networks catch up with energy transition appeared first on RenewEconomy.

Community battery storage will help “dumb” networks catch up with energy transition — RenewEconomy

October 27, 2020 Posted by Christina Macpherson | Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Australia’s biggest carbon customers plan their escape from fossil fuels, but Morrison isn’t listening — RenewEconomy

Japan joins China in announcing a net zero emissions target. This is a big deal for Australia, which depends on fossil fuel exports, but its political leaders are not listening. The post Australia’s biggest carbon customers plan their escape from fossil fuels, but Morrison isn’t listening appeared first on RenewEconomy.

Australia’s biggest carbon customers plan their escape from fossil fuels, but Morrison isn’t listening — RenewEconomy

October 27, 2020 Posted by Christina Macpherson | Uncategorized | Leave a comment

October 26 Energy News — geoharvey

Opinion: ¶ “Tesla Bears Prove Easy Q3 Math Is Hard” • Congrats to Elon and the workers at Tesla for a record setting Q3, by almost every measure. I’ll cover some of the financial highlights, but first, a royal roasting of Tesla bears is in order. Many of them say that regulatory credits are the […]

October 26 Energy News — geoharvey

October 27, 2020 Posted by Christina Macpherson | Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Japan puts off decision to release treated Fukushima water into sea — Fukushima 311 Watchdogs

is it actually possible they are actually listening ??? Japan has put off a decision to release treated radioactive water from the crippled Fukushima nuclear plant into the sea, government sources said Friday, after reports of a formal decision later this month triggered strong opposition from fishermen. Oct 23, 2020 Economy, Trade and Industry Minister […]

Japan puts off decision to release treated Fukushima water into sea — Fukushima 311 Watchdogs

October 27, 2020 Posted by Christina Macpherson | Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Half of Japanese against releasing radioactive water from Fukushima plant; Seoul, Beijing also concerned — Fukushima 311 Watchdogs

October 20, 2020 A recent survey conducted by the Japanese daily Yomiuri Shimbun shows about 50 percent of citizens in Japan are against their government’s plan to discharge radioactive water from the tsunami-wrecked Fukushima nuclear plant into the sea.The survey was conducted on over one-thousand eligible voters from across Japan.Media reports say the fishing industry […]

Half of Japanese against releasing radioactive water from Fukushima plant; Seoul, Beijing also concerned — Fukushima 311 Watchdogs

October 27, 2020 Posted by Christina Macpherson | Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Jeju Governor Vows to Take Legal Action against Japan’s Fukushima Water Release — Fukushima 311 Watchdogs

October 20, 2020 Jeju Province Governor Won Hee-ryong says he will launch both domestic and international lawsuits against Japan should it release radioactive water from its disabled Fukushima nuclear plant into the ocean. At a press conference on Tuesday, Won urged Tokyo to halt preparations for the release, be transparent in providing all relevant information […]

Jeju Governor Vows to Take Legal Action against Japan’s Fukushima Water Release — Fukushima 311 Watchdogs

October 27, 2020 Posted by Christina Macpherson | Uncategorized | Leave a comment

« Previous Entries    

1.This month

  • Pages

    • 1.This month
    • Disclaimer
    • Kimba waste dump Submissions
      • NUCLEAR ROYAL COMMISSION
      • Submissions on Radioactive Waste Code 2018
      • SUBMISSIONS TO SENATE INQUIRY 18
    • – Alternative media
    • – marketing nuclear power
    • business and costs
    • – Spinbuster 2011
    • Nuclear and Uranium Spinbuster – theme for June 2013
    • economics
    • health
    • radiation – ionising
    • safety
    • Aborigines
    • Audiovisual
    • Autralia’s Anti Nuclear Movement – Successes
    • climate change – global warming
    • energy
    • environment
    • Fukushima Facts
    • future Australia
    • HEALTH and ENVIRONMENT – post Fukushma
    • media Australia
    • Peace movement
    • politics
    • religion – Australia
    • religion and ethics
    • Religion and Ethics
    • secrets and lies
    • spinbuster
    • Spinbuster
    • wastes
    • ethics and nuclear power – Australia
    • nuclear medicine
    • politics – election 2010
    • secrecy – Australia
    • SUBMISSIONS to 2019 INQUIRIES
    • weapons and war
  • Follow Antinuclear on WordPress.com
  • Follow Antinuclear on WordPress.com
  • Blogroll

    • Anti-Nuclear and Clean Energy Campaign
    • Beyond Nuclear
    • Exposing the truth about thorium nuclear propaganda
    • NUCLEAR INFORMATION
    • nuclear news Australia
    • nuclear-news
  • Categories

    • 1
    • ACTION
    • Audiovisual
    • AUSTRALIA – NATIONAL
      • ACT
      • INTERNATIONAL
      • New South Wales
      • Northern Territory
      • Queensland
      • South Australia
        • NUCLEAR ROYAL COMMISSION 2016
          • Nuclear Citizens Jury
          • Submissions to Royal Commission S.A.
            • significant submissions to 6 May
      • Tasmania
      • Victoria
      • Western Australia
    • Christina reviews
    • Christina themes
    • Fukushima
    • Fukushima 2022
    • General News
    • Japan
    • Olympic Dam
    • Opposition to nuclear
    • reference
    • religion and ethics
    • Resources
    • TOPICS
      • aboriginal issues
      • art and culture
      • business
        • employment
        • marketing for nuclear
      • civil liberties
      • climate change – global warming
      • culture
      • energy
        • efficiency
        • solar
        • storage
        • wind
      • environment
      • health
      • history
      • legal
      • media
      • opposition to nuclear
      • people
      • personal stories
      • politics
        • election 2013
        • election 2016
        • election 2019
        • Submissions Federal 19
      • politics international
      • religion and ethics
      • safety
        • – incidents
      • secrets and lies
      • spinbuster
        • Education
      • technology
        • rare earths
        • thorium
      • uranium
      • wastes
        • Federal nuclear waste dump
      • weapons and war
    • water
    • Wikileaks
    • women

Site info

Antinuclear
Blog at WordPress.com.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Follow Following
    • Antinuclear
    • Join 794 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Antinuclear
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...