Antinuclear

Australian news, and some related international items

Nuclear news – week to 16 November, Australia and more

As in last week. the media continues to be preoccupied with the American presidential situation, and after all, that IS pretty important.  The really big global stories are the global coronavirus and climate change.

Still, nuclear issues continue – simmering tensions in nuclear weapons states, and the remarkably co-ordinated promotion of Small Nuclear Reactors to governments around the world, in both rich and developing countries.  The nuclear-news.net  site will now have to stick to just NUCLEAR news.

 Some bits of good news –          Vaccine Alliance Raises $2 Billion to Buy COVID Shots for Poor Nations. Renewable Energy Defies COVID-19 Downturn To Hit Record Growth in 2020.

AUSTRALIA

Why the Antinuclear.net site  will now stick to examining NUCLEAR issues.

Federal nuclear waste dump plan for Kimba, South Australia

Senate dumps on the Australian government’s radioactive waste plan. The Australian government can still bully its way to imposing a Kimba nuclear waste dump.   Karina Lester speaks out: ”Traditional owners’ voices not heard and rights stripped over nuclear waste dump”.  Minister Pitt on Kimba nuclear waste dump plan – inept, badly briefed, or just plain lying? Planned nuclear waste dump at Kimba has absolutely nothing to do with the production of nuclear medicine. Doctors call for an open independent review of nuclear waste production and disposal.

Australian govt’s Kimba nuclear waste dump plan will be torpedoed in the Senate. Relief in Kimba, that Labor and crossbench Senators want a fair process on nuclear wastes.  Uncertainty over Kimba nuclear waste dump as farmers go to Canberra to oppose it.

Senator Sam McMahon enthuses about Generation IV nuclear reactors for the Northern Territory.

Australian government ponders nuclear submarines.

Since Penny Sackett, Australia’s Chief Scientists have moved further towards the extractive industries.  Previous Chief Scientist not a fan of Small Nuclear Reactors

CLIMATE.  Australia’s freedom of information system hides climate documents.

INTERNATIONAL

Hibakusha renew their push for the abolition of nuclear weapons.

Julian Assange ‘targeted as a political opponent of Trump administration and threatened with the death penalty’.

Topics in today’s “Nuclear” headlines on Google News.

November 16, 2020 Posted by | Christina reviews | Leave a comment

Doctors call for an open independent review of nuclear waste production and disposal

One of the first principles of toxic waste management is to reduce production.

Non-reactor production of nuclear medicine is increasing, and produces very little radioactive waste. Australia should be partnering with countries like Canada, to research non-reactor production of the commonest nuclear medicine isotope Technetium.

16 Nov 20, The Medical Association for Prevention of War is calling for an open independent review of nuclear waste production and disposal in Australia, to create a careful evidence based long term best practice plan.

The recent deeply flawed proposal for a federal nuclear dump and store at Kimba now looks unlikely to get support in the Senate.

It was a cheap storage plan for highly radioactive waste that stays radioactive for more than 10,000 years- an interim facility with no longer term plan. It effectively dumps the problem on future generations of South Australians.

 The Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency chief executive Dr Carl-Magnus Larsson, at a Senate inquiry in June 2020, said: “Waste can be safely stored at Lucas Heights for decades to come.”

MAPW Vice-President Dr Margaret Beavis said, “We have plenty of time to properly review and plan a disposal facility that meets international best practice standards. The recent proposal did not meet those standards.

Contrary to disgraceful and dishonest government scaremongering, there is no threat to nuclear medicine in Australia.  I and other MAPW members regularly rely on nuclear medicine in our clinical practice.”

We call on the government to commit to an open independent review of both production and disposal of nuclear waste.

One of the first principles of toxic waste management is to reduce production.

Non-reactor production of nuclear medicine is increasing, and produces very little radioactive waste. Australia should be partnering with countries like Canada, to research non-reactor production of the commonest nuclear medicine isotope Technetium.

November 16, 2020 Posted by | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, Federal nuclear waste dump | Leave a comment

Planned nuclear waste dump at Kimba has absolutely nothing to do with the production of nuclear medicine

Peter Remta, 16 Nov 20, Referring to Minister Keith Pitt’s media release of 9 November 2020 regarding the round table conference on nuclear medicine  –  it  still fails to answer and explain how precisely will nuclear medicine be affected by not having a national waste management facility at Kimba.

It is well known that nuclear waste is currently stored in over 100 different locations throughout Australia most of which has been generated through nuclear medical treatment and is classified as low level waste. However as Minister Pitt has himself  acknowledged it would be very doubtful if the national facility managed to get 30% of that waste for storage and
disposal.

How will the production of nuclear medical material by ANSTO at Lucas Heights be affected by the failure to have the waste facility at Kimba?

The proposed facility at Kimba has nothing to do with and will not affect the production of nuclear medicine by ANSTO and to suggest otherwise is totally false and deliberately misleading.

It is no more than clutching at straws in order to convince senators who are opposed to the Bill for the waste facility presently before the Senate to change their minds.  It is an insult to their intelligence.

The only thing that will affect the production of nuclear medicine by ANSTO is its own inherent problems with the nuclear medicine facility plant at Lucas Heights which keeps breaking down and having trouble despite the
huge cost of planning and building it.

Again that has nothing to do whatever with the proposed waste facility at Kimba other than perhaps to demonstrate the inefficiency of ANSTO and confirm the dangerous nature of the reactor waste which is completely unsuitable for storage at Kimba before ultimate disposal.

Despite many repeated requests,  Senator Pitt has not  explained  how nuclear medicine will be affected should the waste facility not to be built at Kimba,
I

November 16, 2020 Posted by | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, Federal nuclear waste dump, secrets and lies | Leave a comment

Relentless lobbying by Small Nuclear Reactor companies still doesn’t make them economic or safe

Telegraph 14th Nov 2020  ”………Rolls-Royce, via a relentless lobbying campaign over the past few years, seems to have convinced the Government that its “mini-nukes” project is a runner. It claims billions are needed from taxpayers to underpin investment in a new production line that will reduce the costs and risks compared with bespoke new reactors such as the £22bn monster at Hinkley Point C.

There are plenty of reasons to be sceptical that even with its nuclear submarine experience, Rolls and its partners can pull it off. The technology is unproven anywhere and – as anti-nuclear campaigners argue – more reactors inevitably mean more potential points of failure. Nuclear power has a poor record of delivering its budgets too…….”

 

November 16, 2020 Posted by | General News | Leave a comment

Julian Assange ‘targeted as a political opponent of Trump administration and threatened with the death penalty’

November 16, 2020 Posted by | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, civil liberties, politics international | Leave a comment

International leading experts opt for 100 per cent renewables and reject nuclear power 

Leading experts opt for 100 per cent renewables and reject nuclear power  https://100percentrenewableuk.org/leading-experts-opt-for-100-per-cent-renewables-and-reject-nuclear-power

The undersigned believe that a future based on 100 per cent renewable energy underpinned by traditional and advanced energy efficiency and storage techniques is not only practicable, affordable, but immensely preferable to one that involves nuclear power. Renewable energy offers us a rapid path to net zero carbon transition that, unlike nuclear power, does not involve the need for decommissioning of radioactive plant, nuclear waste or concerns about safety or security threats. With this in mind we regard the prospect of the Government effectively offering unlimited sources of funding to EDF to build Sizewell C nuclear power plant with dismay and urge people to send in their objections to their MPs at this prospect.

  • Dr David Toke, Director, 100percentrenewableuk,

also Reader in Energy Politics, University of Aberdeen.

  • Jonathon Porritt,

Founder, Director and Trustee, Forum for the Future
Co-Director of the Prince of Wales’s Business & Sustainability Programme

  • Professor Tom Burke
  • Founding Director of E3G
    • Professor Peter Strachan

    The Robert Gordon University
    Aberdeen Business School

    • Dr Paul Dorfman

    Founder and Chair Nuclear Consulting Group
    Honorary Senior Research Associate UCL Energy Institute

    • Professor Bryan Wynne,
    • Professor of Science Studies and Research Director of the Centre for the Study of Environmental Change
      • Professor Andrew Stirling,

      Professor of Science and Technology Policy,

      University of Sussex

      • Professor David Elliott,

      Technology Policy Group

    • The Open University
      • Professor Stephen Thomas,

      Public Services International Research Unit (PSIRU)

      University of Greenwich

      • Professor Mark Jacobson,

      Director of Atmosphere/Energy Program,

    • Stanford University (USA)
      • Professor Christian Breyer,

      Lappeenranta University of Technology (Finland)

      • Shaun Burnie

      Independent Nuclear Consultant

      • Dr Ian Fairlie,
      • Vice President CND
        • Pete Wilkinson

        Chairman, Together Against Sizewell C (TASC)

        • Dr Philip Johnstone

        Research Fellow
        Science Policy Research Unit (SPRU)

November 16, 2020 Posted by | General News | Leave a comment

Disposal plan all at sea? — Fukushima 311 Watchdogs

In late October pressure appeared to be mounting on the Japanese government to decide on a method of disposal for 1.2 million tonnes of radioactive wastewater from the former nuclear plant at Fukushima Daiichi Workers at TEPCO’s Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station work near above-ground storage tanks in 2013 11 November, 2020 As rain and […]

Disposal plan all at sea? — Fukushima 311 Watchdogs

November 16, 2020 Posted by | Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Brutal Truth’: Fukushima’s Radioactive Water Threatens Life Worldwide, Warns Environmental Journo — Fukushima 311 Watchdogs

by Mohamed Elmaazi November 10, 2020 The after effects of the disaster at the Fukushima nuclear power plant continues to be felt as Japanese authorities struggle to appropriately deal with contaminated radioactive water which, some of which is already being released into the Pacific Ocean, an environmental journalist explains. Robert Hunziker is a widely published […]

Brutal Truth’: Fukushima’s Radioactive Water Threatens Life Worldwide, Warns Environmental Journo — Fukushima 311 Watchdogs

November 16, 2020 Posted by | Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Japan faces another Fukushima disaster crisis — Fukushima 311 Watchdogs

Collecting sea water samples near the damaged Fukushima nuclear power station. November 3rd, 2020, by Paul Brown A plan to dump a million tonnes of radioactive water from the Fukushima disaster off Japan is alarming local people. LONDON, 3 November, 2020 − The Japanese government has an unsolvable problem: what to do with more than […]

Japan faces another Fukushima disaster crisis — Fukushima 311 Watchdogs

November 16, 2020 Posted by | Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Fukushima: Detecting Radiation at Japan’s 2021 Olympic Venues — Fukushima 311 Watchdogs

November 2, 2020 Fairewinds ongoing scientific research with Dr. Marco Kaltofen of WPI has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication in the Journal of Environmental Engineering Science. As soon as the Journal of Environmental Engineering Science has an online preprint link available, Fairewinds will release details and a link to the publication. Fairewinds ongoing Japan Project in this peer-reviewed […]

Fukushima: Detecting Radiation at Japan’s 2021 Olympic Venues — Fukushima 311 Watchdogs

November 16, 2020 Posted by | Uncategorized | Leave a comment

NSW renewable energy plan seals death warrant for six gigawatts of coal — RenewEconomy

The NSW government’s renewable plan signals the death knell for many coal generators, and even the Loy Yang generators in Victoria will be struggling by 2030. The post NSW renewable energy plan seals death warrant for six gigawatts of coal appeared first on RenewEconomy.

NSW renewable energy plan seals death warrant for six gigawatts of coal — RenewEconomy

November 16, 2020 Posted by | Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Minister Pitt on Kimba nuclear waste dump plan – inept, badly briefed, or just plain lying?

Peter Remta, 14 Nov 20, THE HON KEITH PITT MP  Minister for Resources, Water and Northern Australia Member for Hinkler   MEDIA RELEASE 12 November 2020

NATIONAL RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
‘‘The National Radioactive Waste Management Facility is a vital piece of  national infrastructure, which will support the ongoing development of our nuclear medicine and research industries.”

He still fails to explain how and why

Minister for Resources, Water and Northern Australia Keith Pitt said this will be a permanent facility, where our low-level radioactive waste will be disposed of and then monitored over several hundred years, and intermediate level waste will be temporarily stored.
“The waste that will be managed at the facility is from the production of nuclear medicine (such as gloves, gowns and flasks) and from research activities,” he said.
“Waste has been accumulating for over 70 years, and for more than 40 years successive governments have been searching for a site.’‘  ”This waste is currently being stored in more than 100 locations around the country, including temporary facilities at ANSTO’s Lucas Heights campus that will start reaching capacity from 2026.”
Only a fraction of all the waste currently held in the numerous locations will actually find its way to the new national facility if it were built.
 
“We need a better solution to safely consolidate this waste. Without it, valuable space at ANSTO will continue to be taken up, and they will have to divert more and more resources away from research and innovation and towards waste management.”
This is completely false as the waste accumulating at Lucas Heights is generated from the both the overseas reprocessing of spent fuel from the HIFAR reactor and the production of molybdenum-99 for nuclear medical procedures

All of this waste is classified as intermediate level waste although when France returned the reprocessed spent fuel to Australia it classified it as high level waste

There has not been any suggestion by either ANSTO or ARPANSA that this waste is causing any lack of storage space or other problems at Lucas Heights.
Most importantly and as previously explained this has nothing to do with nuclear medicine treatment or the requirement of establishing the waste facility at Kimba which only makes Pitt seem even sillier than he is.
“After four years of detailed, thorough, and transparent consultation, we have found a suitable site for this facility near Kimba, South Australia. The site is technically suitable and the facility is broadly supported by the community.”
Minister for Resources, Water and Northern Australia, the Hon Keith Pitt  MP, dispelled concerns that the facility could impact on agriculture.
How because he certainly does not do so by his subsequent comments?
It is not suitable according to international safety codes and prescriptions and is not broadly supported by the community as constantly claimed This was apparently made abundantly clear to the minister on his visit to Kimba last week.
“Firstly, the land where this facility to be sited is of marginal agricultural value, we are talking about 160 hectares out of 8.14 million hectares of agricultural land in South Australia,” Minister Pitt said.
Surely he is not that ignorant or badly briefed to not understand the large land areas that are needed as safety and buffer zones as shown by overseas experience
A minor escape of radioactive material can easily affect thousands of hectares of surrounding land with the consequent destruction of agriculture and the general environment.
“Secondly, we know that internationally, radioactive waste management facilities have existed side-by-side in agricultural communities for decades with no negative impact.”
He should specify the results of these so-called instances of coexistence of nuclear installations and agricultural industry ranging from open riots by local communities to substantial changes to the methods of storage and disposal due to community demands.
Please remember the ANSTO people who at an international nuclear safety conference were justifying Australia’s position of using Kimba and Hawker by its similarity to and modelling on El Cabril in Spain only to be told that the Spanish facility is located in a disused uranium mine in a very remote and heavily wooded part of Spain compared to the  recognised prime agricultural areas chosen in South Australia.
 
“The countries we sell grain to have nuclear programs, as do the other grain producers in the international market”.

What difference does that make?
“And further, we have specifically dedicated part of the site for agricultural research and development and will continue to work with the local agricultural industry.”
International prescriptions and best practices are strongly against any form of research or scientific activity near or within the region of particularly above the ground nuclear facilities making this another idiotic claim by Pitt.

Continue reading →

November 14, 2020 Posted by | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, Federal nuclear waste dump, politics | Leave a comment

Australian government completely inept in selecting Kimba nuclear waste dump

The method of selecting the Kimba location of Napandee and its inherent unsuitability cannot be altered by anything that Minister Pitt says or does, including  convening roundtable conferences of experts in nuclear medicine.
The choice of the location is wrong from the start, and has nothing whatever to do with nuclear medicine.
In any case those medical experts would have little or no knowledge of nuclear waste engineering or management.   For Pitt to claim otherwise is false, and only exposes the disingenuous nature of attempting to gain acceptance of the government’s proposals.
The whole selection process of Napandee for an above the ground nuclear waste facility has been a most badly arranged and pursued exercise which regrettably showed up the complete lack of expertise and knowledge on the part of the government and its entities.

November 14, 2020 Posted by | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, Federal nuclear waste dump | Leave a comment

Relief in Kimba, that Labor and crossbench Senators want a fair process on nuclear wastes

No Radioactive Waste Facility for Kimba District– 14 Nov 20  · We are reassured by this week’s events that there are still many in Australian politics who believe in a fair process. The lack of support from Labor and crossbench Senators for the Government’s proposed Bill to legislate Kimba as the chosen site for the national radioactive waste dump is certainly a relief to us.
It is obvious that this was an attempt to sneak through a law that would remove accountability by the Government for their unfair and manipulative process, which they clearly do not believe would hold up to scrutiny. Whilst it’s likely our fight is far from over, what this means for us is that, if the Minister uses his power under the current Act to declare the site in Kimba, our rights to judicial review remain intact.
We are grateful, as always, for the strong show of support we have received over the last few weeks.
We have spent two very productive days at Parliament House speaking about our concerns regarding the proposed Kimba dump site and the Government’s attempts to pass legislation that intentionally takes away our rights to judicial review. Thank you to all of our supporters who helped get us there, this has been a long and expensive fight, but our voices are being heard. https://www.facebook.com/noradwastekimba/

November 13, 2020 Posted by | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, Federal nuclear waste dump, politics | Leave a comment

Biden and Harris include fantasy of ”small nuclear reactors” in an otherwise progressive climate policy

the Biden-Harris agenda lists small modular reactors under its “game-changing technologies.” In a way, that’s correct. Diverting money into small modular reactors will be game-changing. It will put us firmly on the road to climate failure.

The good news is that nuclear power does not play much of a role in the Biden-Harris plan. But the bad news is that, when it comes to nuclear power, the Biden camp has indeed chosen fiction over science.

In Promoting New Nuclear Power, Biden-Harris Back Fiction Over Science,  https://www.counterpunch.org/2020/11/13/in-promoting-new-nuclear-power-biden-harris-back-fiction-over-science/   BY LINDA PENTZ GUNTER  Although possibly a sad comment on his predecessors, incoming U.S. president, Joe Biden, is offering the most progressive climate policy so far of any who have previously held his position.

As Paul Gipe points out in his recent blog, the Biden-Harris climate plan uses the word “revolution” right in the headline — a bit of a departure from the usual cautious rhetoric of the centrist-controlled Democratic Party.

But ‘revolution’ is proceeded by two words which let us know we are still lingering in conservative ‘safe’ territory. They call it a “clean energy revolution”, which Gipe rightly refers to as “focus-group shopped terminology.” He goes on Continue reading →

November 13, 2020 Posted by | General News | Leave a comment