Antinuclear

Australian news, and some related international items

Lynas Rare Earths plant to be highlighted in documentary on ionising radiation

Japanese filmmaker to highlight Lynas controversy, Free Malaysia Today, G Vinod, September 6, 2011“….A foreign documentary on the nuclear meltdown in Japan will also highlight the controversy over the Lynas rare earth refinery in Malaysia.

PETALING JAYA: A Japanese filmmaker plans to include the Lynas rare earth controversy in his upcoming documentary on nuclear radiation which is scheduled to be released in October 2011.The filmmaker, Shunji Iwai, decided to highlight the plight of the people in Gebeng, Pahang after hearing about the matter from his Malaysian counterpart, Tan Chui Mui.

Lynas Corporation Ltd plans to build a RM700 million rare earth refinery in Gebeng, to facilitate transportation of its mining products from Western Australia’s Mount Weld to the plant in Gebeng. The plant is expected to be operational by end of this year.

However, the community in Gebeng are up in arms against the project fearing radioactive contamination in the area surrounding the plant. Although the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) had said the mine would be safe, Kuantan MP Fuziah Salleh dismissed its report, saying that most of the findings were made based on data given by Lynas itself…….

Tan herself would be directing a few parody educational video called “Survival Guide in Radioactive Village” to create awareness among the public on the Lynas scare. The documentary is scheduled for release in October for the Japanese market. It will subsequently be released to the global audience via the Internet…http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/2011/09/06/japanese-filmmaker-to-highlight-lynas-controversy/.

September 7, 2011 Posted by | environment, Western Australia | Leave a comment

Call to stop transport of radioactive rare earths through Fremantle

Carles moves to ban rare earth ores in Freo – The West Australian, 5 Sept 11,Fremantle MP Adele Carles has called for the transportation of rare earth ores through Fremantle to be halted immediately because she is concerned about potential radioactivity.In a position that puts her at odds with her partner, Transport Minister Troy Buswell, and the State Government, the independent MP has claimed the rare earths, which are mined by Lynas Corporation at Mt Weld near Laverton, could be a hazard to public health and safety…..

The term “rare earths” refers to a range of metallic elements that are used in a range of modern products including high-powered magnets for wind turbines, electric hybrid vehicles, computer hard discs, smartphones and flat panel displays.

The ore contains thorium and uranium oxides, albeit at levels regulators say do not pose a radiation risk…..

Ms Carles said she was concerned Lynas’ proposal “looks like the Magellan experiment all over again”, referring to the problems Magellan Metals has had in complying with its environmental management plan to export lead carbonate through Fremantle……

Ms Carles yesterday hosted protestors from Malaysia, who are opposed to Lynas building a processing plant in Kuantan, the capital of Malaysia’s Pahang state. The protestors are concerned that the strategically important plant – the only rare earths processing facility outside China – could leave the area a toxic site…..Carles moves to ban rare earth ores in Freo – The West Australian

September 6, 2011 Posted by | environment, Western Australia | Leave a comment

Australian federal government abdicating its role in environmental protection?

States get a bigger say on the environment, The Age, Tom Arup, August 25, 2011THE Gillard government has rolled out a business-friendly overhaul of national environment laws, boosting the states’ role in approving or rejecting controversial new projects like pulp mills and mines…….

Under the reforms the Commonwealth will seek deals with the states that would mean most projects would need either state or federal environmental approval, not both….

Australian National University environmental legal expert Andrew Macintosh said yesterday the proposal had to ensure adequate protection of national environmental assets and ”leave an opening for the Commonwealth to intervene where the national interest is threatened by parochial state interests”.

The Australian Conservation Foundation’s Dr Paul Sinclair said delegating power to the states to approve projects would be a backwards step, adding “if business wants a one-stop shop, it must be a federal shop”..….

opposition environment spokesman Greg Hunt. Mr Hunt yesterday welcomed the proposed reforms and said the Coalition was broadly supportive.

Greens environment spokeswoman Larissa Waters said she was disappointed the reforms did not include measures to consider a project’s carbon emissions and impact of water resources…http://www.theage.com.au/national/states-get-a-bigger-say-on-the-environment-20110824-1ja8n.html

August 26, 2011 Posted by | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, environment, politics | Leave a comment

South Australia to ban uranium mining in Arkaroola Wilderness Sanctuary

Premier Mike Rann announces permanent protection for Arkaroola Wilderness Sanctuary, Herald Sun, By Greg Kelton and Sarah Martin ,  July 22, 2011 ARKAROOLA will be protected for all time from mining, South Australia Premier Mike Rann has announced during a visit to the wilderness sanctuary. Continue reading

July 22, 2011 Posted by | environment, politics, South Australia | | Leave a comment

Time that Australian govts stepped in to protect Kakadu from ERA’s dangerous uranium mining plans

 little wonder that Ranger has been hammered by the market and described as Rio Tinto’s ”major shame in this country”…. the cold hard fact remains that no modern uranium mine has ever undertaken large-scale acid heap leaching let alone in the monsoonal tropics surrounded by a renowned World-Heritage site…

The time has come for the Northern Territory regulator the Department of Resources and the Commonwealth adviser, the Office of the Supervising Scientist, to ensure that ERA and the Ranger site addresses the systemic failures in tailings and water management and ends the habit of unnecessary risk taking. .

Need for greater mining rules to protect Kakadu, Canberra Times, BY GAVIN MUDD, 15 Jul, 2011 Plans to expand the Ranger uranium operations pose big dangers. Inside Australia’s largest national park lies one of the country’s most controversial mines. Earlier this year it came close to a serious failure that would have contaminated Kakadu, effectively forever. Now, instead of heeding the warning signs, it wants to expand. Continue reading

July 15, 2011 Posted by | environment, Northern Territory, uranium | Leave a comment

Koongarra now a World Heritage National Park – and not an Areva uranium mine

Koongarra makes world heritage listing  ABC News Jun 28, 2011     After more than 30 years, a uranium-rich piece of Aboriginal land near Kakadu National Park has been added to the World Heritage List. The 1,228-hectare site, known as Koongarra, was added to the register during a meeting of the UNESCO World Heritage Committee in Paris. The French nuclear energy company Areva, which owns mining licences in the area, had unsuccessfully asked the committee to remove Koongarra from its agenda.

Koongarra is important Aboriginal land but was originally excluded from the park in 1979 because of its potential uranium resources.

Australian Conservation Foundation chief executive Don Henry says it is the end of a long fight to protect it from uranium mining. “Kakadu is beloved by many Australians,” he said. “This is right beside the famous Nourlangie Rock area and it’s a great tribute to Jeffrey Lee, the traditional owner who’s called for its protection to look after his own country, but it’s a great gift for all Australians.” Environment Minister Tony Burke welcomed the decision, saying it will help protect Koongarra for generations to come. There are some legal steps the Government will need to finalise before Koongarra is officially included as part of Kakadu National Park. It means the area will be fully protected under law and mining prohibited……http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2011/06/28/3255045.htm?site=news

June 28, 2011 Posted by | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, environment | Leave a comment

Uranium mine expansion to damage marine life, leave huge radioactive wastes

plans for the desalination plant would pose a major risk to local marine life……..”Under no circumstances should the governments involved in the assessment of the supplementary EIS approve of this desalination plant,”

it will dump more than two cubic kilometres of radioactive tailings over an area measuring up to 44 square kilometres,” Senator Ludlum said.

“The new open pit proposed will leak over eight million litres of radioactive liquids every day.”

OLympic Dam Mine Expansion ‘Staggering’  ninemsn news, 31 May 11 BHP Billiton’s proposed expansion at its Olympic Dam mine in South Australia would make it the biggest mine in the world. The figures involved are simply staggering……….the whole site, with its production and support facilities, will cover an area of about 30 square kilometres, a fair chunk of Adelaide’s metropolitan area…… Continue reading

June 2, 2011 Posted by | environment, Olympic Dam, South Australia, uranium | , | Leave a comment

BHP’s desalination plant a threat to Upper Spencer Gulf ecology

at left – the unique and beautiful Giant Cuttlefish faces extinction by the desalination plant

Green fears aired over Olympic Dam mine plans  ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation) May 20, 2011 Concerns have been raised about BHP Billiton’s plan to expand the Olympic Dam mine.A fishing group in Upper Spencer Gulf says BHP Billiton’s revised plans do not go far enough to protect the environment.In its revised environmental impact statement, BHP confirmed it will go ahead with a desalination plant at Point Lowly. BHP also plan to build an unloading facility to barge machinery further up the gulf.

Robin Sharp from the Coastal Homes Association says he is worried the region’s ecosystem will be in danger.”We’ve already got an invasive oyster up here that we believe has been introduced by shipping over the last 20 or 30 years, pretty much overrun the whole razorfish intertidal zone, so it will pretty much wipe out all the razorfish in this area,” Mr Sharp said.Green fears aired over Olympic Dam mine plans – ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

May 21, 2011 Posted by | environment, South Australia | | 1 Comment

Olympic Dam uranium mine waste pile – 6720 hectares,150 metres high

BHP’s Olympic Dam uranium mining expansion “……In all it will remove a 350-metre thick layer of overburden and the rock taken out will be transported to a rock storage facility that covers 6720 hectares and will eventually be 150 metres high. By 2050, when the mine has not even completed half its life, the pit will be 4.1 kilometres long, 3.5 kilometres wide and one kilometre deep……” – Robert Gottliebson, Climate Spectator

May 16, 2011 Posted by | environment, South Australia, uranium | | Leave a comment

BHP’s uranium mine project will create a mountain of radioactive wastes

 “This EIS shows the company has designed Olympic Dam to leak up to eight million litres of liquid radioactive waste per day.  BHP Billiton plans to dump radioactive tailings on the surface and leave them there forever, rather than pay to isolate the toxic waste from the environment

BHP Final EIS & ACF Call to account for Olympic Dam’s international impact -BHP Billiton has released a multi-phonebook-sized environmental impact statement to support its proposal to make Olympic Dam the world’s largest uranium project, but the EIS does not address the risks that go along with Australian uranium when it is used in nuclear reactors overseas.

 The Australian Conservation Foundation has challenged the company to re-do its environmental assessment to take account of disasters like Fukushima. Continue reading

May 16, 2011 Posted by | environment, South Australia, uranium | | Leave a comment

Australian government’s strange delay on environmental laws

”It is curious the government will take longer to respond to the review than it took a team of experts to investigate and write it.”..

Environment laws on hold, The Age Tom Arup, 1April 26, 2011THE government will wait at least two years until it responds to a comprehensive review recommending a shake-up of national environment laws. Continue reading

April 28, 2011 Posted by | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, environment | Leave a comment

End self-regulation of uranium mines: ERA can’t be trusted

The situation at Ranger added weight to his calls for an end to self-regulation of the Northern Territory’s resources sector.

“Mining companies have consistently shown they can’t be trusted to monitor themselves and the government needs to step in and end this ridiculous situation immediately.”

Uranium mine shutdown sparks environmental fears, Sydney Morning Herald, Lindsay Murdoch DarwinApril 19, 2011 THE largest Aboriginal organisation in northern Australia has warned the Rio Tinto-controlled company Energy Resources of Australia against cutting corners on environmental protection during an emergency shutdown of its Ranger uranium mine in Kakadu National Park. Continue reading

April 19, 2011 Posted by | environment, Northern Territory, uranium | Leave a comment

For unspoilt Tasmania, nuclear power is not a good look

Nuclear not for Tassie   The Mercury – The Voice of Tasmania, 26 March 11, “……..If  Tasmania is to become an island famed worldwide for its niche and high-quality food, fish and wine products; creative, scientific and artistic talent; unspoilt heritage and unique wilderness and tourism experiences, it is also worth considering that a nuclear power station may not be such a good look or brand fit. Continue reading

March 26, 2011 Posted by | environment, Tasmania | Leave a comment

Antinuclear cry from the heart of Australia’s heartland

As for the business of the Australian Federal Government paying off an indigenous group to dump radioactive material on their land (Muckaty Station near Tennant Creek  in the Northern Territory)…it’s such an appallingly low act…If nothing else, read your insurance policies.  Do they specifically rule out claims against personal or property damage that is nuclear-accident related?  Why?No insurance company or underwriters will touch it with a mile-long pole, because the potential cost of a nuclear disaster is unimaginably high….


Nuclear power stations and nuclear waste dumps in outback Australia,  Fiona Lake Australian Photographs, 24 march 11, Where should nuclear power stations and nuclear waste dumps be located, in Australia? In the heart of our largest city, Sydney. Oh but what if there is an accident? Well if there is any, any, chance of an accident – then we must not have a nuclear power station or nuclear waste dump in Australia at all. Continue reading

March 24, 2011 Posted by | environment, Northern Territory | Leave a comment

Grim outlook for nuclear radiation disaster, less bad for Australia

Dr Caldicott said any fall-out was unlikely to affect Australia, though the death toll in the northern hemisphere could be severe.

“Australia is probably not going to be affected by fall-out because the northern and southern air masses don’t mix.”

Caldicott: Japan may spell end of nuclear industry worldwide | Independent Australia, 16 March 11, –  ‘The situation is very grim and not just for the Japanese people’ One person who is in no doubt about the seriousness of the incident is prominent anti-nuclear campaigner, Dr Helen Caldicott. Independent Australia spoke exclusively to Dr Caldicott yesterday as she was in transit to Canada to speak at a hearing into a proposal to build four new power plants in Darlington, Ontario. The situation is very grim and not just for the Japanese people,” said Dr Caldicott. Continue reading

March 17, 2011 Posted by | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, environment | Leave a comment