Paul Howes defies ACTU policy on nuclear
Paul Howes and Bill Shorten are a couple of young gungho, publicity-seeking right-wing Labor politicians. They’re both bent on getting to the top, and know who to make friends with – the big powerful corporations.
Paul Howes doesn’t miss an opportunity to spruik pro-nuke. And, it doesn’t bother him if he has no sensible answers to the critics of the uranium/nuclear industry.
Paul is quite happy to use the time-honoured methods of the nuclear lobby – just denigrate your opponents – so much easier than addressing the issues.
The Age, 7 November 09, on Paul Howes: “He dumps on Labor’s opposition to nuclear power, describing the stance as ‘ancient, hypochondriac…superstitions of another age’ that ignore the evidence of its potential as a clean and viable source of long-term energy.
Howes advocacy of the nuclear option flies in the face of its staunch rejection by the ACTU – of which he is vice-president”
The strange mentality of some nuclear commentators
In a week of dubious comments from fossil-fuel and nuclear industry puppets, it’s been hard to choose the weirdest comment.
But I like the one from Northern Territory Labor MP Damien Hale. Apparently, Hale’s view is that if a state is already contaminated with radioactive pollution, then it’s just fine to go ahead there and add more pollution. Is South Australia stuffed already, as far as radioactive contamination goes – so it can be open slather for nuclear waste in S.A.?
The Labor Member for Solomon, Damien Hale, .. says there is political support for the dump to be built in South Australia.”Now we all know there’s areas of Australia that are already contaminated through radioactivity,”Territory MP wants nuke waste dumped in SA – ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)
Job losses at BHP’s uranium mine
Olympic mine job losses The Age BARRY FITZGERALD November 7, 2009 BHP Billiton has warned of job losses among its contractor workforce at the damaged Olympic Dam copper-gold-uranium mine in South Australia Continue reading
Al Gore’s serious doubts on viability of ‘clean coal’
clean-coal-not-the-answer-gore The Age ANNE DAVIES, WASHINGTON 6 Nov
AUSTRALIA should not bank on being able to reduce its greenhouse emissions by storing carbon dioxide from coal-fired power plants, US climate advocate Al Gore has said.
A day after The Age revealed plans by the Brumby Government to gamble on “clean coal” technology in Victoria, Mr Gore expressed serious doubt about its viability and said Australia’s focus should instead be on renewable energy.
“I think a country like Australia probably has more usable and profitable sources of renewable energy than any other nation,” Mr Gore said in an interview with The Age.
“You have desert areas, abundant sunlight within tens of kilometres of most of your major cities.
“You have the ability to construct an Australian super-grid that will transmit that solar and wind and geothermal power straight to the cities . . . and in the process create lots of good new jobs.”…………”What should be discarded is any illusion that (carbon capture and storage) will be available any time soon at a scale large enough to make a dent in our CO2 emissions,” he said……………..http://www.theage.com.au/world/clean-coal-not-the-answer-gore-20091105-hz4k.html
Paid puppets spout ‘climate scepticism’
I know who I prefer to believe in debate TheAge Lynne Holroyd, 6 Nov 09
AL GORE is right when he points to the phoney war of the climate science ”debate”. On one hand is the scientific consensus and on the other are the loony theories financed by those with the most to lose if we cut carbon emissions.
The mouthpieces and puppets of the big polluters are just as hard at work in Australia as they are in the US, where there are four industry lobbyists working against climate change action for every member of the US Congress. Funny how the handful of ventriloquist dolls of Australia’s big polluters tend to be geologists who study rocks – not climate, atmosphere and oceans. Geologists are typically employed by big mining companies. Think the carbon lobby – coal, oil, gas – those fighting the Government-proposed carbon pollution bill tooth and nail.
On the other hand, warning us about the imminent dangers of climate change are the thousands of independent, disinterested climate experts of high repute who checked one another’s findings and published their report in 2007, a report signed off and agreed to by more than 100 countries. I know who I would prefer to believe.
http://www.theage.com.au/national/letters/guilty-until-proven-innocent-20091105-i04s.html
Powerful influence of big polluting industries
revealed-polluters-fear-tactics-on-climate Brisbane Times MARIAN WILKINSON AND FLINT DUXFIELD
November 6, 2009
BIG greenhouse polluting companies around the world, employing thousands of lobbyists, are exerting heavy pressure on governments to weaken climate change laws at home and slow progress on an international climate agreement in Copenhagen, a global investigation reveals.
In Australia, 20 companies who have already won the most concessions from the Rudd Government’s emissions trading scheme employ 28 lobbying firms with well over 100 staff, many of them former politicians, political advisers or government officials.
In the US there are more than 2800 climate lobbyists, five for every member of Congress, an increase of more than 400 per cent over the past six years. From Washington to Canberra and New Delhi to Brussels, companies and their lobbyists are often raising the same widespread fears about jobs, power blackouts and economic losses unless governments weaken commitments to combat climate change.The report by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists examined the climate lobby in eight countries including the US, Canada, Australia, India, Japan, China, Belgium and Brazil. It relied on more than 200 interviews, lobbying registers and political donation records. ………………In the US, chief executives of coal and power companies have hosted a public campaign against climate legislation which is being blocked in the Senate……….
Industry lobby groups have also carved out a permanent role at the UN talks as representatives of the so-called BINGOS – Business and Industry Non-Government Organisations.
While lobbyists for the renewable energy industry, the carbon traders and environmental groups are also becoming more prominent, the report finds that their voices ”can barely be heard above the clamour of the older, well-capitalised and deeply entrenched industries that have been lobbying on climate change for more than 20 years”.http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/national/revealed-polluters-fear-tactics-on-climate-20091106-i0ju.html
Australia should be leader in renewable energy
Get a supergrid The Geelong Advertiser, Gavin Brown 6 Nov 09 “…………………….The most powerful claim from coal and nuclear supporters is that renewable energy cannot provide baseload power, as it is not available at all times in the day. This is a partial truth. A small number of isolated series of solar and wind stations will not provide baseload power, however, as our renewable energy supply becomes larger and the variety of electricity-generation types increases, the variations in natural factors such as wind, sun, tides and waves cease to become a significant problem.
In fact, such a system would be less susceptible to power outages than our current system. If technologies such as hydro power, geothermal and bioenergy (burning crop waste) are included in the mix, these can allow simple fine-tuning of electricity supply to allow for variations in demand. Another common argument is that we need nuclear power to bridge the gap while renewable energy technologies develop to the point where they can replace coal. This argument is completely misleading. Many of the emerging renewable energy technologies will be able to provide large quantities of baseload power in Australia well before we can develop nuclear reactors or prove the concept of carbon capture and storage.
In spite of all this talk about other technologies, a great majority of the renewable energy available to us is solar. So the solution to the debate depends upon relatively new technologies in solar power, a rapidly developing field. One new technology is called concentrated solar power (CSP). This uses hundreds of mirrors to concentrate the suns rays onto solar panels. A group in Europe has developed a concept called DESERTEC, which involves placing CSP arrays in desert areas in the Middle East and North Africa and transmitting the power generated from these throughout Europe, the Middle East and North Africa via a supergrid comprising super-efficient, high-speed, high-voltage transmission lines.
The DESERTEC foundation estimates it only needs to cover 0.3 per cent of the Sahara Desert with CSP plants to power these areas with electricity, with less than three per cent of the Sahara needed to power the world. Other scientific research has proved wind power could theoretically supply the entire world with 40 times the electricity used in the world today (and five times the total energy used)……………….Why is Australia not developing its own version of DESERTEC? We have a massive solar supply in our desert regions, many windy areas throughout the nation, great waves, plenty of rubbish (biomass) and one of the largest geothermal energy supplies in the world right here in Geelong. We have the scientific talent to make it happen _ if we get moving before our scientists all leave the country.
Manufacturers have left the country and the mining boom will one day be over. Our country will have to start producing sustainable incomes to adjust to this reality. An Australian supergrid is the simplest way for us to take a leadership position in the response to climate change and allow our economy to continue to flourish into the future.http://www.geelongadvertiser.com.au/article/2009/11/06/119155_opinion.html
Australians against nuclear power – latest poll results
An opinion poll by the Australian Nuclear Science and Technnology Organisation (ANSTO) shows the latest results on Australians’ attitude to nuclear power. Poll results as at 5 November 2009
NT politician claims that South Australia wants nuclear waste dump
Territory MP wants nuke waste dumped in SA ABC News By Michael Coggan Nov 4, 2009 Darwin A Northern Territory federal politician is arguing for a national nuclear waste dump to be built in South Australia. Continue reading
Nuclear power for Australia? – a definite NO
Australia’s Future Power Sources Won’t Include Nuclear – PM CANBERRA -By Ray Brindal, Dow Jones Newswires 4 November 09 – The future sources for Australia’s power needs include coal, natural gas and a range of renewables rather than nuclear, Prime Minister Kevin Rudd said Wednesday. Continue reading
Northern Territory targeted as the only place for nuclear waste dump
Nuclear dump sites ‘all in the Territory’ NORTHERN TERRITORY NEWS NICK CALACOURAS November 3rd, 2009 THE Federal Government has been sitting on a report on the decision to build a nuclear waste dump in the Territory for the past nine months. Continue reading
Review: BHP under scrutiny, ANSTO rigs poll
Australia. Lucas Heights nuclear waste has to be returned to Australia; Rudd govt pretty sure to dump it on aboriginal land. China buying up big into Australian uranium mining. S.A. govt very little restriction likely for Marathon’s uranium mining in Arkaroola, and no obligation for Four Mile to clean up after u-mining ends. . Melbourne and Perth protest rallies mark BHP’s AGM. ANSTO caught out crookedly rigging opinion poll.
International. Iran avoids international agreement to prevent it developing nuclear weapons.
US Hanford nuclear workers to be compensated for their cancers. Alternative annual report launched for BHP Billiton’s AGM. Iraq now seeking to have nuclear power. French nuclear plant has critical buildup of plutonium. – the week that has been
Australia’s conflict of interest: nuclear disarmament
Australia and Iran Pickled Politics Sandra Hajda 31st October, 2009
“…………….The meeting was in fact brokered by the International Commission on Nuclear Non- Proliferation and Disarmament, a body founded by Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd. Continue reading
Need to prevent the spread of nuclear technology
The ICNND and Japanese Civil Society Policy Forum Online By Kawasaki Akira
Australia and Japan have two significant commonalities. One is that they are important allies for the United States within the Asia Pacific region, and that their security is based upon the so-called “nuclear umbrella,” dependent upon US nuclear weapons. Continue reading
Rudd govt cowardly about nuclear waste obligations
Australia is contractually obliged to take back from France the reprocessed nuclear waste from ANSTO’s Lucas Heights nuclear reactor.
The Rudd government, like the Howard government is just too cowardly to explain this truth to the Australian people, and then to act sensibly and honorably.
The government could choose Commonwealth land, take back the existing waste, close down Lucas Heights, and finish this problem.
But, no. The Rudd government will con and bribe the citizens least able to resist, – the aborigines, – in the Territory least able to resit, the Northern Territory.
If that were not enough of cowardice and hypocrisy, the Rudd government is then likely to use ANSTO to open the door to the return of radioactive wastes to Australia. A very lucrative industry for a few big players, including the uranium mining companies.
No sensible housewife would even plan a meal in the knowledge that the house would be left with permanent, unfixable, toxic waste. But then what government would ask the opinion of a sensible housewife?
1 This month
of the week – Australians for War Powers Reform (AWPR)
To see nuclear-related stories in greater depth and intensity
Antinuclear 