Antinuclear

Australian news, and some related international items

Government’s aboriginal policy – convenient for nuclear industry?

Two points of view here, on the Australian government’s aboriginal policy.  How I would like to think that our government is completely sincere in its policies towards the aborigines.  And perhaps the government is sincere, in many regards. Continue reading

November 27, 2009 Posted by | aboriginal issues, AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, uranium | , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Alice Springs protest against uranium mining

We will quit if uranium mine opens, say doctors Sydney Morning Herald DEBRA JOPSON November 23, 2009
DOCTORS at the only Aboriginal medical service in Alice Springs have threatened to leave if the Federal Government allows a Canadian company to mine uranium near the town.

Protesters will press Northern Territory MPs to stop their support when Parliament sits in Central Australia tomorrow. Continue reading

November 23, 2009 Posted by | Northern Territory, politics, uranium | , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Nuclear power uneconomic for Australia

Peak Energy:  Crikey’s Bernard Keane has the next installment of his series on why nuclear power is unlikely to be seen in Australia – 20 Nov 09

To those who say “beaudy nuke”: why should taxpayers suffer? What would it cost Australia to go nuclear? Good question. Excellent question, in fact, because no one really knows. Continue reading

November 20, 2009 Posted by | 1, AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, business, climate change - global warming, energy | , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

“Clean” nuclear power now a bribe for weapons non proliferation?

Could it be that the nuclear powers are in so deep that they just don’t know how to get out? Despite the cost, despite the mounting unsolved waste problem, despite the countries seeking nuclear weapons, the Big Powers forge on with the myths of “clean” “cheap”, “climate friendly” nuclear power. From the statement of Gordon Brown, and the US China joint statement (both quoted below) it looks as if the myths will continue to be perpetrated, and that even the failed idea of the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership might get a re-run.

‘We can lead construction of a new global order’ Public service.co.uk November 17, 2009 The UK can shape the world of the future by leading in global co-operation, the Prime Minister said in his annual speech on foreign policy at the Lord Mayor’s banquet. Gordon Brown – “………..Britain must continue to lead the renewal of a grand global bargain between nuclear weapon and non-nuclear weapon states. A fair and balanced deal in which non nuclear weapons states must accept clear responsibilities to end proliferation by renouncing nuclear weapons in return for the right to access civil nuclear power;…..

‘We can lead construction of a new global order’ – Public Service

U.S.-China Joint Statement CBS News Political Hotsheet by Brian Montopoli November 17, 2009 Following President Obama’s meeting with Chinese President Hu Jintao, the White House released a joint statement on the relationship between the two countries,
………The two sides welcomed the establishment of The U.S.-China Energy Cooperation Program (ECP), a partnership between government and industry to enhance energy security and combat climate change. The ECP will leverage private sector resources and expertise to accelerate the deployment of clean energy technology.

The two sides agreed to work together to advance global efforts to promote the peaceful use of nuclear energy. They welcomed the recently-concluded Third Executive Committee Meeting of the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership, and the commitment of the partnership to explore ways to enhance the international framework for civil nuclear energy cooperation. They agreed to consult with one another in order to explore such approaches — including assurance of fuel supply and cradle-to-grave nuclear fuel management so that countries can access peaceful nuclear power while minimizing the risks of proliferation.

In Full: U.S.-China Joint Statement – Political Hotsheet – CBS News

November 19, 2009 Posted by | 1, Christina reviews | , , , , , | Leave a comment

Low uranium prices stopping new projects

Uranium too low to incentivise new mines  Mining Weekly By: Liezel Hill17th November 2009 TORONTO– Uranium prices still will need to firm significantly to justify the development of many of the mining projects being considered around the world, Jean Nortier, the CEO of Vancouver-based Uranium One, reiterated on Monday……… Continue reading

November 19, 2009 Posted by | 1, AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, business, uranium | , , | Leave a comment

Aborigines’ Maralinga land still radioactive

Maralinga land ‘not ready’ for handing back  ABC News  Nov 11, 2009 An ex-serviceman who was exposed to radiation during Maralinga atomic testing in the 1960s says land should not be handed over to traditional owners until a contaminated area is cleaned up or fenced off. Continue reading

November 18, 2009 Posted by | aboriginal issues, South Australia | , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Continued secrecy, denial, about radiological warfare

atom-uran-1Before the Bomb – book review – On Line Opinion, by Noel Wauchope  – 9/11/2009 Where do we go, to find out about the radiological effects of atomic weapons?We usually seek out the rather patchy and incomplete stories of the victims – those at the “receiving end” of bombing, at Hiroshima, or of the atomic tests of Nevada, of Mururoa, Montebello, Maralinga. These have been covered in several books.But, how much was known about these radiological effects before the Bomb?

Here, at last, is the book that answers this question. And Paul Langley’s book The Prediction of the Radiological Effects of Atomic Bombs From Knowledge Published Prior to August 1945 answers it with evidence in forensic detail, a plenitude of exact primary documentary evidence, including digital evidence available on the Internet.

This is also a book that raises questions: questions that matter very much right now. Today, World War II veterans, Pacific Islanders, Navajo people and Australian Aborigines seek acknowledgment and justice for their diseases from exposure to radiation. Iraqi doctors and communities, and US, Canadian and UK Gulf War veterans claim health damage from depleted uranium. Where is the truth?…………..

It is an Australian shame that recognition has not been given to aboriginal victims. The reaction of Australian authorities has been a record of “lies, denial, racial taunts and suppression of evidence.” In Project Sunshine’s calculations of exposure dose to Australians, two population groups were excluded. These were: Aborigines living in remote areas around the bomb test sites, and the soldiers and others involved in the tests. In other words the two most affected groups.

A later health study continued to exclude the Aborigines, ignoring the testimony of survivors, their memory of the “Black Mist”, and even of those with Beta burns. Secrecy surrounded the investigation. Professor Ernest Titterton, Chairman of the Australian Atomic Weapons Test Safety Committee, kept project information from the Committee. As he stated “I was subject to American control on information.”

 

Before the Bomb – book review – On Line Opinion – 9/11/2009

November 10, 2009 Posted by | 1, AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, secrets and lies, uranium | , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Notorious atomic bomb test site returns to aboriginal ownership

Traditional indigenous owners to reclaim Maralinga bomb site THE AUSTRALIAN  David Nason  November 10, 2009 MORE than 50 years after their ancestral lands were devastated by nuclear testing, the Tjarutja people of western South Australia will next month be handed back the infamous expanse of remote desert the British named Maralinga.

Continue reading

November 10, 2009 Posted by | 1, aboriginal issues, South Australia | , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

France hungry to sell nuclear reactors to Australia?

Sarkozy-salesFrance backs Australian nuclear power industry THE AUSTRALIAN  AAP  November 09, 2009 FRANCE, the world’s most nuclearised country, has backed a nuclear power industry in Australia.The French government’s environment ambassador Laurent Stefanini says nuclear power is a good fit for a country that has the world’s largest uranium reserves.

Mr Stefanini said that going nuclear is a reliable and useful way to avoid greenhouse gas emissions……………

France backs Aussie nuclear power industry | The Australian

November 8, 2009 Posted by | 1, AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, spinbuster | , , , | Leave a comment

Media silence on land grab for uranium

Pilger: Breaking the Australian Silence by John Pilger 06 November 2009 Pacific Free PressI would like to talk about this silence: about how it affects our national life, the way we see the world, and the way we are manipulated by great power Continue reading

November 8, 2009 Posted by | 1, AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, secrets and lies, uranium | , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The strange mentality of some nuclear commentators

a-cat-CANIn a week of dubious comments from fossil-fuel and nuclear industry puppets, it’s been hard to choose the weirdest comment.

But I like the one from Northern Territory Labor MP Damien Hale. Apparently, Hale’s view is that if a state is already contaminated with radioactive pollution, then it’s just fine to go ahead there and add more pollution. Is South Australia stuffed already, as far as radioactive contamination goes – so it can be open slather for nuclear waste in S.A.?

The Labor Member for Solomon, Damien Hale, .. says there is political support for the dump to be built in South Australia.”Now we all know there’s areas of Australia that are already contaminated through radioactivity,”Territory MP wants nuke waste dumped in SA – ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

November 7, 2009 Posted by | Christina reviews, uranium | , , , , , | Leave a comment

Australians against nuclear power – latest poll results

An opinion poll by the Australian Nuclear Science and Technnology Organisation (ANSTO) shows the latest results on Australians’ attitude to nuclear power. Poll results as at 5 November 2009

ANSTO-051109

November 5, 2009 Posted by | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, politics, uranium | , , , , , | Leave a comment

NT politician claims that South Australia wants nuclear waste dump

Territory MP wants nuke waste dumped in SA ABC News By Michael Coggan  Nov 4, 2009   Darwin A Northern Territory federal politician is arguing for a national nuclear waste dump to be built in South Australia. Continue reading

November 5, 2009 Posted by | 1, politics, South Australia, uranium | , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Northern Territory targeted as the only place for nuclear waste dump

Nuclear dump sites ‘all in the Territory’ NORTHERN TERRITORY NEWS NICK CALACOURAS November 3rd, 2009 THE Federal Government has been sitting on a report on the decision to build a nuclear waste dump in the Territory for the past nine months. Continue reading

November 4, 2009 Posted by | 1, Northern Territory, politics, uranium | , , , , , | Leave a comment

Review: BHP under scrutiny, ANSTO rigs poll

 

a-cat-CANAustralia. Lucas Heights nuclear waste has to be returned to Australia; Rudd govt pretty sure to dump it on aboriginal land. China buying up big into Australian uranium mining. S.A. govt very little restriction likely for Marathon’s uranium mining in Arkaroola, and no obligation for Four Mile to clean up after u-mining ends. . Melbourne and Perth protest rallies mark BHP’s AGM. ANSTO caught out crookedly rigging opinion poll.

International. Iran avoids international agreement to prevent it developing nuclear weapons.
US Hanford nuclear workers to be compensated for their cancers. Alternative annual report launched for BHP Billiton’s AGM. Iraq now seeking to have nuclear power. French nuclear plant has critical buildup of plutonium. – the week that has been

November 2, 2009 Posted by | Christina reviews, uranium | , , , , , , , | Leave a comment