Antinuclear

Australian news, and some related international items

Why Rudd will put a radioactive waste dump in the Northern Territory

a few prominent white suits (living well away from the NT) could indeed see this as the beginning of a bonanza of taking in the rest of the world’sradioactive wastes.

Once again – it’s all simple politics. The Australian government is obligated to take back , within a year or so, radioactive wastes from UK – wastes that originated in Australia’s terrorist target – the Lucas Heights nuclear reactor.

There is no simple solution. Perhaps this relatively small nuclear waste dump could be situated at Lucas Heights, where it started, or perhaps it could join the existing radioactive waste at Woomera in South Australia.  Then Lucas Heights could be closed, and that would be the end of it.

No such simple story, however, and in fact, no story at all, as it’s all decided very quietly – let the Australian public sleep on!

But – it must be the Northern Territory  – they’re the only ones who cannot defy the federal government, – all the other States have the power to veto taking in nuclear wastes.

Anyway,a few aborigines could indeed see it as a good deal, getting a living standard equal to the rest of Australia perhaps –  though the rest of us didn’t need to have our land turned into a radioactive waste in order to get that standard.

More to the point, a few prominent white suits (living well away from the NT) could indeed see this as the beginning of a bonanza of taking in the rest of the world’s radioactive wastes.

February 19, 2010 Posted by | Christina reviews, Northern Territory, politics | , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Nuclear power rebirth in USA? Not likely

Obama’s Nuclear Option – Amy Goodman Truthdig 16 Feb 2010
“……….Obama’s publicly financed resuscitation of the nuclear power industry in the U.S. is bound to fail, another taxpayer bailout waiting to happen.Opponents of the plan, which includes a tripling of existing nuclear plant construction-loan guarantees to $54.5 billion, span the ideological spectrum. Continue reading

February 19, 2010 Posted by | 1 | , , | Leave a comment

Price-Anderson Act makes taxpayer liable for nuclear power risks

The Price-Anderson bill is the one that caps the nuclear industry’s liability and makes us (that’d be you) liable for the rest

(USA) Excuse Me, But That Nuclear Plant Has Its Hand On Your Wallet, San Francisco Chronicle : Gerald Sindell 18 Feb 2010 “……..if you dig out your handy guide to the laws of the United States you’ll find something called the Price-Anderson Act, a temporary measure passed in 1957 to help the nuclear industry get going. Atoms for Peace and all that. Continue reading

February 18, 2010 Posted by | 1 | , | Leave a comment

Areva getting out of an Australian uranium project

WA stock values fall in January  WA Business News Finance: 17-February-

Berkeley Resources announced it had terminated its head of agreements signed in March 2006 with French nuclear power group Areva NC. In doing so, any rights previously granted to Areva for off-take or marketing of uranium production from Berkeley’s projects have been terminated with immediate effect,….

WA stock values fall in January – WA Business News

February 18, 2010 Posted by | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, business, uranium | , , , | Leave a comment

Obama’s big financial risk with nuclear power

The government backing of the Georgia project is a major financial gamble, but the White House seems to see it as worth the risk politically…….The case the administration has made is that they will give Republicans more nuclear power, offshore oil and gas drilling, and incentives for coal, if they will accept a cap on carbon emissions and investments in renewable energy.

Obama’s risky nuclear renaissance The Guardian, Kate Sheppard 17 February 2010 Barack Obama’s promise to fund new nuclear power plants is a major financial gamble – and US taxpayers will foot the bill Continue reading

February 17, 2010 Posted by | 1 | , | 1 Comment

Uranium price outlook not too good

Spot Uranium Remains Under Pressure

FNArena News – By Rudi Filapek-VandyckFebruary 16 2010Investors and uranium market enthusiasts may want to pay attention as two stockbrokers in Australia used last week’s somewhat disappointing results release by Paladin Energy (PDN) to reiterate their negative view both for uranium companies and for the short term outlook for spot U3O8 prices. Continue reading

February 17, 2010 Posted by | 1, uranium | , , , , | Leave a comment

Germany’s Environment Minister will shut down nuclear reactors

Environment minister stands firm on nuclear power plant closure  Deutsche Welle | 15.02.2010

Germany’s   environment minister has thrown his weight behind shutting down the country’s nuclear reactors. Continue reading

February 16, 2010 Posted by | 1 | , , , , | Leave a comment

Business Charter calls for Financially Risky Nuclear Business

David Noonan said high set-up costs made nuclear an unviable energy source for SA.

Business SA calls for “bold and brave” reforms in its Charter For A Prosperous South Australia | Adelaide Now Daniel Wills February 16, 2010

“……The charter challenges political leaders to adopt reforms including:…….PURSUING development of a nuclear energy industry to “take advantage” of the state’s enormous uranium stores….. Continue reading

February 16, 2010 Posted by | politics, South Australia | , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Nuclear power too financially risky

Nuclear power, strike 2 MNN – Mother Nature Network  Karl Burkart  16 Feb 2010 Even Wall Street won’t touch nuclear because it is too financially risky. At least 1 out of 2 nuclear plants will fail, leaving taxpayers with the burden of debt. Continue reading

February 16, 2010 Posted by | 1 | , , | Leave a comment

800 Peaceful Protestors block UK nuclear site

(UK) 800 peaceful protestors block gates to Aldermaston nuclear site | Ekklesia 15 Feb 2010
Around 800 nonviolent protesters have succeeded in blocking access to the majority of gates at the Atomic Weapons Establishment at Aldermaston in Berkshire. Faith groups are playing a major role in the protests, which began at 7.00am this morning. Continue reading

February 16, 2010 Posted by | 1 | , , , | Leave a comment

Maralinga nuclear tests and the environment

areas of fused or ‘glazed’ sand are still contaminated with levels of plutonium which are of a high and dangerous level

The impact of nuclear testing on the Australian environment | Blog About All 16 Feb 2010 “………..As well as the tests at Monte Belle islands, between 1952 and 1963 the British government, with the agreement and support of Australia, carried out ‘major’ tests at two other sites on the Australian mainland at Emu Field and Maralinga in South Australia. Continue reading

February 16, 2010 Posted by | 1 | , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Bill Gates believes Nuclear Power problems will be solved

Gates outlined his belief that if you can deal with the radiation and safety issues – ““We need energy miracles,” Gates said

Bill Gates Goes Nuclear    BusinessWeek by: Helen Walters February 15….. Continue reading

February 16, 2010 Posted by | 1 | , , , | Leave a comment

Australia’s Maralinga Nuclear Veterans dying out, while they wait for justice

Nuclear veterans want better compo deal Sydney Morning Herald MAX BLENKIN 11 Feb 2010

“Australian veterans are dying. The longer the government waits, the less of us they will end up having to compensate.”

Britain exploded seven atomic bombs in the South Australian outback in 1956-57 but continued the nuclear test program through to May 1963 with a large number of minor trials of items such as nuclear initiators. Continue reading

February 12, 2010 Posted by | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, legal, uranium | , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

What a Damn Yankee Nuclear Nuisance!

(USA) Just as the nuclear idustry pushes for massive public money, for  extending the life of its aging reactors and setting up new ones, along comes a pesky little bit of democracy!

Alone in the nuclear power world, the Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant actually has to rely on the State Legislature to say yea or nay to extended its miserable radioactively leaking life. (Other U.S. States don’t have this “luxury” of controlling their ancient or new nuclear reactors.)

Oh dear, this leaky old ship could bring about the sinking of the whole nuclear power fleet in America. (Meanwhile government-run nuclear industries – France, China – etc – they don’t have this pesky problem of being financially or in any other way, accountable to the people.)

February 12, 2010 Posted by | Christina reviews | , , , , | Leave a comment

Vermont Yankee – just one of many aging, leaking nuclear power plants

Indeed, a desperate national industry now pushing for massive federal subsidies to build new reactors may not survive a flood of elderly clunkers being forced to close by the weight of their own contamination….

Vermont’s radioactive nightmare FDL The Seminal Harvey Wasserman
February 10, 2010

Like a decayed flotilla of rickety steamers, at least 27 of America’s 104 aging atomic reactors are known to be leaking radioactive tritium, which is linked to cancer if inhaled or ingested through the throat or skin. Continue reading

February 12, 2010 Posted by | 1, water | , , , , , | Leave a comment