Antinuclear

Australian news, and some related international items

Paladin calls Catholic Commission a paid ‘puppet’ of Western corporations

men-angry1Australian uranium firm condemns Malawi NGOs

Trading Room BLANTYRE, Oct 2 AFP

October 03 2009,

Australia firm Paladin has dismissed allegations of contamination from a northern Malawi uranium mine, telling MPs that two rights groups have been paid funds to discredit its operations. Continue reading

October 3, 2009 Posted by | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, secrets and lies, uranium | , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Fine depleted uranium travels far in winds

Australia ‘uranium’ dust concerns
muzzylogic  Oct 3, 2009 ‘Environmentalists have raised concerns that another giant dust storm blowing its way across eastern Australia may contain radioactive particles. Continue reading

October 3, 2009 Posted by | 1, AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, climate change - global warming, environment, uranium | , , , , , | Leave a comment

Gas beats nuclear, and it’s a good transition to renewables

a-cat-CAN

I realise that I am out of step with many environmentalists, but I am a fan of gas as an energy source. We cannot just shut down all our big fossil fuel industries. Nuclear power just adds damage and danger, along with its greenhouse gases. Continue reading

October 2, 2009 Posted by | Christina reviews, climate change - global warming, Victoria | , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Maralinga lingers on with radioactivity

Australia, dust storms and the fallout Britain left behind

Idealist.ws 1 Oct 09 “………What is Maralinga?  How did plutonium get there?

In the 1950s and 1960s, Australia was the host of a handful of U.K.-sponsored atmospheric nuclear tests and related nuclear experiments on the Montel Bello Islands (off the northwest coast) and at Emu Field and Maralinga, both located in the Great Victoria Desert in South Australia. At Maralinga2 between 1957 and 1963, the U.K. conducted several plutonium dispersal experiments, dubbed ‘minor trials’ (very similar to the ones conducted at the Nevada Test Site; see: safety experiments), which scattered radioactivity (tens of pounds of Plutonium 239) far and wide into the bush.

Through the 1990s, the Emu and Maralinga sites were physically blocked off by a 100-mile radius security zone, which might have been a good enough barrier for un-remediated (not cleaned up) nuclear sites but in reality is no match for a dust storm the size of several hurricanes. (If the same sized-radius were blocked off around the Nevada Test Site, it would force the evacuation of Las Vegas.)

Although the ‘Maralinga Rehabilitation Project’ – finished in 2000 – cleaned up some of the ‘minor trial’ plutonium, not all of the plutonium is cleaned up and the waste burial practices have been SERIOUSLY3 called into question mostly because the plutonium was buried only 3 to 4 meters deep.  Australia’s Senator Lyn Allison noted in 2003: “No matter how many reports are produced, the fact of the matter is that 22kg of plutonium is buried in simple, unlined earth trenches, some of it just a couple of metres below the surface.”  The Sunday Age article titled “Agenda – Maralinga’s Afterlife” on May 11, 2003, stated that: ‘The vitrification method was abandoned by MARTAC three-quarters of the way through the project, in favour of the much cheaper trench-method. Most of the waste – including broken-up vitrified material – was then buried in unlined pits covered with just three metres of clean soil. The rest was left on the desert surface. As a result, an area the size of metropolitan London – 300 square kilometres – remains infected with lethal plutonium that will stay active for a quarter of a million years.’   That section of land is dubbed the ‘North West Plume,’ located northwest of Taranaki and contaminated largely from the ‘Vixen B’ trials …………. Australian authorities have denied there is any radiological health problem with the red dust………………………………. Although it is commendable that ARPANSA acknowledged that radioactive material was in the red dust that coated most of the populated areas in Australia and New Zealand, ARPANSA’s Burns is saying more to allay fears than educating Australians about the consequences of their actual radiation exposure to the dust…………… Even if the winds significantly diluted and reduced the concentration of the Maralinga soil-laden plutonium in the red-dusty air, it will still be extremely toxic because it takes just one millionth of a gram of plutonium to deliver a lethal dose and even more minute quantities (billionths of a gram) might induce cancer.   Theoretically, even a single atom (particle) of plutonium has the ability, from its extremely strong alpha radiation (like a very strong, mini X-ray machine), to produce free radicals and alter DNA in our body’s cells – both are precursors to cancerous growth.

Since any population exposure to radiation increases the risk of cancer in a population, the dispersion of plutonium dust from Maralinga over thousands of miles of populated Australia has increased Aussie’s cancer burden………. In the Southern Hemisphere, wherever this red dust is now lingering, if it is brought down to Earth by rain it will contaminate surface areas (shingles, pavement, cars, crops, etc…) and water supplies as long as the radiation’s half-life, which can be hundreds or thousands of years.  Ingesting radiation from contaminated foodstuffs and water constitutes the greatest danger from radiation exposure. http://idealist.ws/australia.php

October 2, 2009 Posted by | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, secrets and lies, uranium | , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Russian uranium company to join Cameco in Central Australia

Russia‘s ARMZ in talks with Cameco on uranium mining

MOSCOW, Oct 1 (Reuters) – State-controlled Russian uranium miner ARMZ Holding is in talks with Canada’s Cameco Corp (CCO.TO) on possible mining joint ventures in Australia and Africa, the company’s deputy head said on Thursday…… The idea arose, he said, because a joint venture with Cameco in Russia had stalled due to laws limiting foreign access to strategic mineral resources. (Reporting by Polina Devitt, writing by Robin Paxton, editing by Maria Kiselyova) http://www.reuters.com/article/euMergersNews/idUSL112565120091001

October 2, 2009 Posted by | business, Northern Territory, uranium | , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Australian “Pentagon” against nuclear attack

KRudd’s war room to deal with all manner of Strangelove situations

Sydney Morning Herald, by Tony Wright October 1, 2009 “……..a brand-new, super-secret installation called Headquarters Joint Operations Command. It’s in a paddock about 35km outside Canberra, heading towards the village of Bungendore, and it’s been built for $300 million or so to provide, in military-speak, “the Chief of the Defence Force with an effective world class platform for the command and control of the Australian Defence Force on operations around the world and within Australia”.

This Australian Pentagon is supposed to have underground bunkers where the government can shelter and continue to operate in the event of a nuclear attack, major terrorist assault or natural disaster on Canberra.

The 2009 Budget, if you looked very closely indeed, revealed that $7.4 million was being spent on a super-secret plan to protect the nation’s decision makers in such emergencies.

No details were given, but The Goanna recalls early plans that seeped out after the Howard Government’s national security subcommittee approved in 2004 what was called “broad elements of the government post-doomsday blueprint”………… http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/krudds-war-room-to-deal-with-all-manner-of-strangelove-situations-20091001-gdsj.html

October 2, 2009 Posted by | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, safety | , , , , | Leave a comment

Uranium dust, an unmentionable radioactive fact

The dust that dare not speak its name WA Today September 30, 2009 Source: The Sydney Morning Herald, Elizabeth Farrelly “…………………For us, as for most of the world, central Australia might as well not exist. It is almost a paradigm of unthinkability. It’s Timbuktu. That’s why we do things like nuclear testing there. It’s why BHP Billiton’s proposal to turn the Olympic Dam uranium mine into an open-cut operation is even contemplated for approval. Because it’s there, not here. Or was there – until, like Burnham Wood, it came here.

Open-cut uranium mining? It’s a gash a kilometre deep, churning 410 million tonnes of radioactive dirt per annum, “dewatering” the local aquifers, using 253 megalitres of water a day. No wonder the locals call them water thieves.

Of course, BHP’s environmental impact statement devotes a couple of pars to dust management. BHP proposes water trucks – like the ones they spray roads with. And they’ll monitor airborne particulates at nearby Hiltaba Village (so small even Google Maps can’t find it) and the thriving metropolis of Roxby Downs. That’ll do it.

A possibility the EIS doesn’t contemplate, however, is that several thousand tonnes of the stuff might reach the Opera House, or even Mount Egmont, where it lay so thick people thought their cars had rusted overnight. Where even New Zealand rains couldn’t wash it away…………….What goes around, comes around.

The dust that dare not speak its name

September 30, 2009 Posted by | 1, climate change - global warming, environment, South Australia, uranium | , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

70 Million tonnes of radioactive uranium tailings – to blow in the wind?

Radio active dust claims drift in after storms Roxby Downs Sun 30/09/2009 SA Greens MP Mark Parnell has claimed the Olympic Dam mine expansion will create the biggest radioactive waste pile ever seen. Continue reading

September 30, 2009 Posted by | South Australia, uranium, wastes | , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Where to put Australia’s hospital radioactive wastes?

MP attacks nuclear waste ‘indecision’
ABC News 30 Sept 09

The Member for Grey, Rowan Ramsey, says the constant relocation of 10,000 barrels of radioactive waste highlights state and Federal Government indecision. Continue reading

September 30, 2009 Posted by | 1, AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, health | , , , , , | Leave a comment

A nurse wonders about radioactivity in dust from uranium mine

Reflection on Dust Storm

ABC Contribute, by Pete 30 Sept 09 “……………Out of curiosity I googled radioactive sites Woomera as I was born in South Australia and knew a little of what Woomera was involved with as a testing range area for radioactive experiments post Second World War era. Continue reading

September 30, 2009 Posted by | 1, environment, South Australia, uranium | , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Uranium investing future not all it’s cracked up to be

Uranium hunt could have sour fallout the Age BARRY FITZGERALD AND MATHEW MURPHY September 30, 2009 “………..In contrast with the rest of the metals sector since mid-February, uranium prices have been going backwards. Continue reading

September 30, 2009 Posted by | 1, AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, business, uranium | , , , | Leave a comment

Australia does not need the USA’s “nuclear deterrent”

A nuclear challenge to the world On Line opinion By Sue Wareham –  30 September 2009 “…President Obama’s chairing of the UN Security Council on nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation served to focus the nuclear spotlight where it is most needed, on the Council’s five permanent members. Continue reading

September 30, 2009 Posted by | 1, AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, politics international, uranium, weapons and war | , , , , | Leave a comment

Radioactivity from uranium to go way beyond Roxby Downs?

Lifeinthemixtalk.com  By Lynn Stanfield 30 Sept 09 “……..It would not be out of the question to consider this dusty little equation :If a violent dust-storm were to arise in the Woomera – Roxby Downs – Olympic Dam region, then the prevailing ‘Westerly Winds’ which stream across our country at around the 30 – 32 deg (s) latitudes are bound to contain a heap of Uranium 234 particulate matter!. Continue reading

September 30, 2009 Posted by | 1, South Australia, uranium | , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Nuclear hype, but nuclear future uncertain

a-cat-CANReview, by Christina Macpherson. It’s been an interesting  week. Internationally –  two blatant lies are being taken up by prominent world leaders:

1. that developing nuclear power is an essential part of nuclear disarmament

2. that nuclear power is the solution to global warming.

Meanwhile, the global nuclear energy leader, AREVA, is in debt as “poster boy” new reactors in Finland and France continue to have troubles. Thousands of Russians protest against a new nuclear plant.

In Australia, Liberal party MP’s disagree on nuclear policy.  The nuclear lobbyist Ziggy Spinowsky is frantically busy pushing nuclear, (as uranium prices remain low). In W.A., BHP is gently “advised” to consider the Ngalia people’s views on uranium developments. Dust storms, with more predicted, raise fears of radon gas reaching millions of Australians and New Zealanders.

September 29, 2009 Posted by | Christina reviews, uranium | , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Still much to fear from nuclear

The Age, David Noonan, 29 Sept 09

Nuclear weapons raise serious, unresolved questions about Australia’s uranium exports.  The lesson from Iran is that nuclear technology and materials can be – and are – used for dual purposes. The weapons dangers in uranium enrichment are not unique to Iran.  All facilities in the nuclear fuel chain can be used to make weapons.

uranium-trail.The military remain inextricably linked to the civilian nuclear sector in Iran, in Russia, in China and in India.  All these countries fail the test of strengthened nuclear safeguards and should be disqualified from receiving Australian uranium.  And in an age of terrorism every nuclear reactor is a potential target that can be used as a weapon against the community.  The inherent safety and security risks of nuclear are strong reasons to phase out Australia’s uranium exports.  These risks should be front of mind when governments consider BHP Billiton’s plans to expand Olympic Dam to make Australia the global uranium quarry to fuel the nuclear industry.

September 29, 2009 Posted by | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, uranium, weapons and war | , , , , | 2 Comments