Antinuclear

Australian news, and some related international items

Maralinga atomic testing :The Anangu Story

Maralinga: The Anangu Story 50 years ago secret atomic tests were carried out on Australian soil at a place called “Maralinga” in north–western South Australia. Continue reading

October 20, 2009 Posted by | 1, aboriginal issues, South Australia | , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Central Australia’s radioactive waste threat discussed internationally

Radioactive sites get overseas pressure ABC News By Kirsty Nancarrow i Oct 16, 2009

Anti-nuclear campaigners from Central Australia are hoping to put international pressure on the Commonwealth to abandon plans for a nuclear waste facility in the Northern Territory.

Natalie Wasley from the Beyond Nuclear Initiative says it is providing a briefing and a DVD to be screened and distributed to delegates at a conference in Sweden this weekend on the management of radioactive waste.

She says the Australian Government’s failure to consult people who are likely to be affected by the four sites being considered is out of step with what other countries are doing.

Radioactive sites get overseas pressure – ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

October 17, 2009 Posted by | 1, Northern Territory, politics international, uranium | , , , , , | Leave a comment

Maralinga atomic test site unsafe, aborigines affected

Coober Pedy Regional Times Maralinga Anniversary October 15, 1953 – 1967 and nuclear veteran’s website is closed down. “…………..October 15 is the anniversary of the first nuclear test at Maralinga, Totem 1.– the beginning of atomic testing in Australia 1953 – 1967, and the contamination of traditional  Kokatha Lands in the Western Desert of South Australia. The Action Australia page on the ANVAR website contained the details. Continue reading

October 16, 2009 Posted by | South Australia, uranium, weapons and war | , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Eastern Australia – radioactive risk from BHP’s Olympic Dam uranium mine

Australia: Red Sky in the Morning, Radioactive Warming Political Affairs By Peter Mac 14 Oct 09 “………..there is a strong possibility that future dust storms sweeping across from South Australia will be radioactive and will carry toxic metal contaminants. Continue reading

October 14, 2009 Posted by | environment, New South Wales, uranium | , , , , , | Leave a comment

Pro nuke hype hotting up inAustralia

a-cat-CAN

Fairfax newspapers come out today with headlines about Australians wanting nuclear power. In fact, Australian were asked if they thought the Federal Government should “consider” nuclear power.  Not quite the same thing as wanting it. Continue reading

October 13, 2009 Posted by | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, Christina reviews, energy, spinbuster, uranium | , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Nuclear power for Australia – impractical and problematic

The Age 13 Oct 09 Is nuclear power the only way to meet Australia’s future energy needs and cut carbon emissions? Geoff Strong and Ian Munro report.

“……………..  La Trobe University professor Joseph Camilleri. ”I don’t think we have anywhere near a fully fledged, widely accepted, long-term system of waste disposal. Until and unless that comes through … to be thinking of a substantial expansion of the industry is foolhardy,” he says. Continue reading

October 13, 2009 Posted by | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, business, uranium | , , , , , , | Leave a comment

AREVA spins nuclear to kids

AREVA-spinSmAREVA-Medusa1AREVA never misses an opportunity to get the uranium/nuclear soft sell out to kids.

And, apparently the South Australia Museum and the S.A. govt are right behind them. Continue reading

October 8, 2009 Posted by | South Australia, spinbuster, uranium | , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Australian uranium part of global toxic waste problem

Mining uranium fuels a massive toxic problem  Scott Ludlam  6th October 2009, The mining and export of Australian uranium only digs us deeper into the unsolvable conundrum of nuclear waste – while also supporting the growth of nuclear weapons, the Australian Greens say. Continue reading

October 7, 2009 Posted by | 1, AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, uranium | , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Australian govt will not allow import of nuclear wastes

Rudd slams door on nuclear waste industry  THE AUSTRALIAN Christian Kerr  October 07, 2009 THE Rudd government has rejected calls from former Labor foreign minister Gareth Evans for Australia to take back the waste from the uranium it sells. Continue reading

October 7, 2009 Posted by | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, politics international, wastes | , , , , | Leave a comment

Rudd govt must reinstate Racial Discrimination Act

Dump racist intervention measures: QC WA Today  Tara Ravens October 7, 2009 – A leading human rights lawyer says the federal government must rework or scrap racist elements of the intervention program in remote indigenous communities and honour Australia’s obligations under international law. Continue reading

October 7, 2009 Posted by | 1, aboriginal issues, AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, uranium | , , , , | Leave a comment

Review – Gareth Evans – weak sop, and so on

a-cat-CANWell, well, Gareth Evans, ? champion of nuclear disarmament has now come out in favour of Australia taking in everybody else’s dirty washing – i.e. nuclear wastes. I always though he was a weak sop, anyway.

Australia’s Paladin uranium company hopes nobody is noticing that it mucks up Malawi’s drinking water, and that it attacks the Malawi Catholic Commission for Peace and Justice  – (bet it wouldn’t dare have a go at Australia’s)

BHP is lying low – hoping we’ll all forget about the predicted dust storms, as we have apparently forgotten about Maralinga.  Russia plans to join forces with Cameco, in Australia uranium mining.

The nuclear industry is quietly worrying about the falling uranium price, and dimming prospects for commercial nuclear power – hence the increased nuclear hype. Marshall islanders fear sea level rise, to add to their radiation-induced problems.

Some really interesting ideas coming on in how energy efficiency, and smart grids, combining with renewables have great potential for Australia’s energy future. That’s some of the week that has been………….

October 6, 2009 Posted by | Christina reviews, uranium | , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Maralinga’s radioactive fallout 1963 and ? 2009

dust-storm09

Dr. Dick van Steenis It is very interesting to compare the above map of the recent dust storms with the map of the radioactive fallout from the British bomb tests at Maralinga. (see below)

It is also interesting to note that there is very little media coverage about the origins of the dust and the probability of radioactive particles from the Maralinga region where no real clean up was ever carried out.  The film maker David Bradbury has been on ABC.  His concerns were initially brushed off by a “scientist”, Professor Barry Noller, from Brisbane.  It has been shown that that guy is financed by the likes of BHP. David has since received support from Bill Williams, MBBS President Medical Association for Prevention of War (Australia),  International Councillor, International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War.

It seems that SA Minister Holloway, responsible for all decisions regarding the Olympic Dam expansion, has acknowledged that BHP has to reconsider dust control measures for the planned open pit mine.
marafallout

October 6, 2009 Posted by | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, environment, uranium | , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Maralinga radioactive fallout buried in shallow trenches

Dr. Dick van Steenis MBBS Wales UK Tel -44 1686 670688 I refer to the dust storm from central Australia that covered much of NSW & Queensland

There will have been large deposits
of radioactive plutonium, caesium, iodine&  strontium on the sand and in
shallow trenches from the pathetic handling some 9 years ago of fallout from
the Maralinga tests in northern South Australia/ NT.

Also the areas around
Alice Springs had 50000 times rise in radioactivity fron fallout from the
Montebello tests. These all have long half lives. I guess much of that nasty
dangerous stuff ended up in your dust cloud in the past few days. Has
anyone tested the dust for radioactivity? I contributed to a story in the
Australian BULLETIN of 1 September 2004 and was in medical school in
Adelaide during the Maralinga tests.

October 6, 2009 Posted by | South Australia | , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Radioactive problems remain in Hunters Hill

Radioactive homes need rules Science Alert  05 October 2009

There are serious gaps in how Australia deals with the problem of radiation contamination of suburban homes, a leading lawyer told the CleanUp 09 conference in Adelaide on 30 September. Continue reading

October 6, 2009 Posted by | environment, New South Wales, uranium | , , , , , | Leave a comment

Maralinga lingers on with radioactivity

Australia, dust storms and the fallout Britain left behind

Idealist.ws 1 Oct 09 “………What is Maralinga?  How did plutonium get there?

In the 1950s and 1960s, Australia was the host of a handful of U.K.-sponsored atmospheric nuclear tests and related nuclear experiments on the Montel Bello Islands (off the northwest coast) and at Emu Field and Maralinga, both located in the Great Victoria Desert in South Australia. At Maralinga2 between 1957 and 1963, the U.K. conducted several plutonium dispersal experiments, dubbed ‘minor trials’ (very similar to the ones conducted at the Nevada Test Site; see: safety experiments), which scattered radioactivity (tens of pounds of Plutonium 239) far and wide into the bush.

Through the 1990s, the Emu and Maralinga sites were physically blocked off by a 100-mile radius security zone, which might have been a good enough barrier for un-remediated (not cleaned up) nuclear sites but in reality is no match for a dust storm the size of several hurricanes. (If the same sized-radius were blocked off around the Nevada Test Site, it would force the evacuation of Las Vegas.)

Although the ‘Maralinga Rehabilitation Project’ – finished in 2000 – cleaned up some of the ‘minor trial’ plutonium, not all of the plutonium is cleaned up and the waste burial practices have been SERIOUSLY3 called into question mostly because the plutonium was buried only 3 to 4 meters deep.  Australia’s Senator Lyn Allison noted in 2003: “No matter how many reports are produced, the fact of the matter is that 22kg of plutonium is buried in simple, unlined earth trenches, some of it just a couple of metres below the surface.”  The Sunday Age article titled “Agenda – Maralinga’s Afterlife” on May 11, 2003, stated that: ‘The vitrification method was abandoned by MARTAC three-quarters of the way through the project, in favour of the much cheaper trench-method. Most of the waste – including broken-up vitrified material – was then buried in unlined pits covered with just three metres of clean soil. The rest was left on the desert surface. As a result, an area the size of metropolitan London – 300 square kilometres – remains infected with lethal plutonium that will stay active for a quarter of a million years.’   That section of land is dubbed the ‘North West Plume,’ located northwest of Taranaki and contaminated largely from the ‘Vixen B’ trials …………. Australian authorities have denied there is any radiological health problem with the red dust………………………………. Although it is commendable that ARPANSA acknowledged that radioactive material was in the red dust that coated most of the populated areas in Australia and New Zealand, ARPANSA’s Burns is saying more to allay fears than educating Australians about the consequences of their actual radiation exposure to the dust…………… Even if the winds significantly diluted and reduced the concentration of the Maralinga soil-laden plutonium in the red-dusty air, it will still be extremely toxic because it takes just one millionth of a gram of plutonium to deliver a lethal dose and even more minute quantities (billionths of a gram) might induce cancer.   Theoretically, even a single atom (particle) of plutonium has the ability, from its extremely strong alpha radiation (like a very strong, mini X-ray machine), to produce free radicals and alter DNA in our body’s cells – both are precursors to cancerous growth.

Since any population exposure to radiation increases the risk of cancer in a population, the dispersion of plutonium dust from Maralinga over thousands of miles of populated Australia has increased Aussie’s cancer burden………. In the Southern Hemisphere, wherever this red dust is now lingering, if it is brought down to Earth by rain it will contaminate surface areas (shingles, pavement, cars, crops, etc…) and water supplies as long as the radiation’s half-life, which can be hundreds or thousands of years.  Ingesting radiation from contaminated foodstuffs and water constitutes the greatest danger from radiation exposure. http://idealist.ws/australia.php

October 2, 2009 Posted by | AUSTRALIA - NATIONAL, secrets and lies, uranium | , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments